Childhood Apraxia of Speech (exam 2) Flashcards

1
Q

What is apraxia of speech (AOS)?

A

A disorder of volitional speech motor planning and programming resulting in inefficient translation and sequencing of phonological codes into motor plans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Typical target for articulation disorder vs a typical target for AOS:

A

Typical target for articulation disorder:
Correct production of /t/ in initial, medial, and/or final position of word.
Ex: tall, kitten, bat

Typical target for AOS:
Correct production of entire sequence of target string.
Ex: /t/ -> /a/ -> /l/

  • You’re not just cueing placement of a sound, you’re cueing place, manner, voicing, and coarticulation
  • Artic: sometimes a single target sound; AOS: a single target word with re-train ongoing coordination throughout words
  • AOS kids have difficulty with motor coordination on and BETWEEN sounds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

AOS Assessment Tasks:

A
  1. Oral motor exam
    With “puh.tuh.kuh” at comfortable and fast rates
    – estimate their “comfortable rate”; examine breakdown at faster rates – also looking for muscle weakness – dysarthria can co-occur
  2. Articulation testing
    – Consonant/vowel distortions (and distorted substitutions), consistency of errors (at least vowels), stress assignment (to some degree)
  3. Repeated multisyllabic words (Dabul, 2000)
    - Consistency of errors!
  4. Connected speech sample
    - intelligibility testing (% words understood by unfamiliar listener), C or V distortions and distorted substitutions, consistency of errors
  5. Intelligibility testing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Primary Diagnostic Criteria for AOS:

A

Slowed speech rate due to prolongation of or between sounds or syllables
“happy” -> “awwpi”

Consonant and/or vowel distortions
“Zachary” -> ”sokawee”
“Matthew” -> “tawtup”
“move back” -> “mu bawk”

Distorted sounds perceived as substitutions
“Sammy” -> sounds like “shammy” with a distorted “sh” sound

Abnormal stress or generally equal stress
“Teresa” -> “Tesa”

Inconsistent error types
“round and round” -> “wa wa WAN” “wa wa WUTH”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Secondary Diagnostic Criteria

A

May be present (in conjunction with primary features) but not discriminative.

  1. Articulation groping
    - Noticeable struggle to form sounds
  2. Preservative errors
    - “black boxes” -> “black bloxes”
  3. Increasing errors with word length
    - Multisyllabic words less intelligible
  4. Difficulty initiating speech
    - Long pause before starting to speak
  5. Awareness of errors
    - Self-correction / frustration
  6. Automatic speech better than propositional speech
    - yes/no, counting, singing
  7. “Islands” of error free speech
    - Not ALL speech is unintelligible; well-learned or “safe” strings of words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Exclusionary Diagnostic Criteria

A
  1. Fast speech rate + intelligible
  2. Normal speech rate + intelligible
  3. Typical stress assignment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

All-in-one Perceptual Assessment: 7-point rating system

A
  1. Imprecise consonants
  2. Distorted vowels
  3. Prolonged intervals
  4. Excess and equal stress
  5. Slow rate
  6. Fast or normal rate (exclusionary)
  7. Pitch
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Treatment for AOS is typically:

A

Systematic
Incremental
Drill-based

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Suggested dosage of treatment for AOS is typically:

A

3-5x/week, typically 3+ years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Factors of Treatment

A

Selection of target
- High frequency errors
- At level of breakdown (sound, word, or phrase)
- Functional words
- Complexity of targets
Some suggest more complex targets generalize to simpler targets, but not vice versa (Williams, 2010; Jacks & Robin, 2012)

Nature of feedback
-Modality
May begin with all sensory modalities (auditory, visual, tactile, kinematic) then fade with progress

-Verbal feedback
Knowledge of performance - specific verbal descriptions of the patient’s attempt
Knowledge of results - correct or incorrect

-Timing of feedback
Infrequent better than frequent
Delayed better than immediate

Organization of practice
- Sequence of feedback
Model -> Mime -> Simultaneous -> Immediate Repetition -> Delayed Production -> Spontaneous Production

-Sequence of targets
Blocked practice
Practice the same sounds repeatedly in different contexts
-Random practice
Practice the certain sounds with different sounds intermixed in practice

Knock et al. (2000): initial progress facilitated by blocked practice, retention facilitated by random practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Articulatory kinematics

A

MAIN GOAL: correcting misplacement and sequencing of sounds

Most evidence-based positive outcomes

Directly address motor aspects of speech production

Began with Rosenbek’s “8-step continuum”…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Rosenbek’s 8-step Continuum? What is the key to this system that makes it successful?

A

1) Simultaneous production: Child and SLP produce target; maintain auditory or visual stimuli
2) Immediate repetition: SLP provides aud model, client repeats watching therapist mouth gesture
3) Immediate repetition: Same as above, but no SLP mime
4) Delayed repetition: SLP produces target, inserts 1-5 sec delay before imitation, child repeats target several times without aud or visual stimuli
5) Target elicited by question: Child responds

Basically, all other therapy techniques are a variation of this. Key – SLP is varying the temporal relationship between stim and response, intitially providing max cues, then gradually fading cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What alternative treatment is used for severe cases of AOS?

A

AAC devices. The goal is to replace or supplement oral speech production with electronic or physical device

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly