Charles Mills Flashcards
What does Mils argue about in the racial contract ?
He argues that society isn’t built upon a universal agreement of fairness among all people, but rather on an unspoken agreement among white individuals to prioritize their own interests and maintain systems of privilege.
What does Mills think racism is a byproduct of ?
He posits that racism isn’t just a byproduct of societal flaws—it’s a foundational element that shapes laws, norms, and institutions.
Explain legel systems, economci structures , and societal norms in relation to the racial contract
- Legal Systems: Laws that have historically disenfranchised people of color, such as segregation and voter suppression tactics.
- Economic Structures: Disparities in wealth accumulation due to practices like redlining and employment discrimination.
- Social Norms: Stereotypes and biases that influence how different groups are perceived and treated.
Charles mills thoughts on hobbes, locke, and rousseau
Mills also critically examines how classic philosophers—like Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau—ignored or even justified racial hierarchies in their social contract theories. By doing so, they contributed to a worldview that accepts racial inequality as normal or inevitable. Mills challenges readers to recognize that these omissions aren’t accidental but are part of maintaining the racial contract.
So what is the racial contract ?
The racial contract defines who is considered fully human and who isn’t, effectively determining who gets access to rights, resources, and recognition.
Is the racial contract global ?
The Racial Contract is Global: It’s not confined to any one country but is a worldwide system that affects international relations and global inequality.
Racial contract as a foundational agreement
-
The Racial Contract as a Foundational Agreement:
- Mills posits that the racial contract is an implicit agreement among white individuals to uphold white supremacy.
- This contract categorizes people of color as subpersons, thereby justifying their exploitation and marginalization.
Critique of Traditional Social Contract Theorists
Charles mills
-
Critique of Traditional Social Contract Theorists:
- He examines how classic philosophers often ignored or rationalized racial inequalities.
- Mills highlights that the supposed equality in social contract theories doesn’t extend to everyone, revealing a glaring omission in their universality.
Manifestations of the racial contract
-
Manifestations of the Racial Contract:
- Legal Systems: Enact laws that enforce segregation, limit voting rights, or disproportionately target communities of color.
- Economic Disparities: Discusses how slavery, colonization, and discriminatory practices have long-term effects on wealth accumulation and economic opportunities.
- Cultural and Epistemological Dominance: Explores how history, knowledge, and cultural narratives are shaped to center white experiences and perspectives.
Ongoing impact racial contracts
-
Ongoing Impact:
- Mills emphasizes that the racial contract isn’t just a historical artifact but continues to influence contemporary society.
- He urges a re-evaluation of social structures to recognize and dismantle these ingrained inequalities.
Key dimensions of the racial contract
-
Moral Terms:
- The racial contract delineates a moral code that privileges whites. It implies that whites are inherently more moral or worthy of moral consideration. This justification has historically supported acts of colonization, slavery, and segregation by dehumanizing nonwhites and deeming them less deserving of rights and humane treatment.
-
Political Terms:
- Politically, the racial contract legitimizes the exclusion of nonwhites from the political sphere, either through outright disenfranchisement or through subtler forms of political marginalization. This manifests in policies that ensure whites maintain control over political institutions and decision-making processes, effectively silencing nonwhite voices.
-
Epistemological Terms:
- Epistemologically, the racial contract shapes what is considered knowledge and who is deemed capable of producing it. It prioritizes white perspectives and experiences as the standard, often dismissing or devaluing the lived experiences and knowledge of nonwhites. This control over knowledge production reinforces stereotypes and biases, perpetuating racial inequities.
Difference between ideal social contract and racial contract
In the ideal social contract the change is from natural to civil/political man
But in the racial contract the corresponding transformation is non-white and white