Characterisation of Agonist-Receptor Interaction: Occupancy, Affinity, Dose-Response Curve, Potency, Efficacy Flashcards

1
Q

Types of Receptor Ligands

A

Agonist
Full Agonist: can evoke maximal effect
Partial Agonist: evokes submaximal effect

Antagonist

Allosteric Modulator

Inverse Agonist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

‘Equation’ of Agonist Action

A

Agonist + Free Receptor Agonist Receptor Complex

Agonist Receptor Complex –> Activated Agonist-R Comp.

Activated Agonist-R Complex–> Effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Concentration- Occupancy Relationship

A

Agonist + Free Receptor Agonist Receptor Complex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Definition of Occupancy

A

Fraction or percentage of receptors occupied by agonist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hill Langmuir Equation

A

p= Nl/Nt = c/ (c+(k2/k1)) = c/ (c+Kd)

p= Receptor occupancy
Nl= # Ligand Bound Rs
Nt= total # receptors
c= ligand conc
k2= Rate constant for dissociation
k1= Rate constant for association 

Kd= equilibrium dissociation constant of agonist-R compl.
Ligand conc. causing 50% occupancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conclusions based on the Hill Langmuir Equation

A

Occupancy depends on
Ligand concentration and Kd

With high ligand concentrations occupancy approaches 1
Ergo: Ligand binding is saturable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Graphical form of Hill Langmuir Equation

A

Sigmoid shaped using log scale
(hyperbola in normal conc scale)
Y Axis: Occupancy (%)
X Axis: log Conc

Turning point of sigmoid shape: Kd: 50% occupancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Kd

A

Characterises binding tendency of ligand–> affinity
Inversely proportional: Increase Kd, decrease affinity

High affinity-> high selectivity
Ligand binds to target R at low conc
Fewer SEs

EC50: Agonist conc. evoking 50%
Characterises potency of drug

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Concentration- Response Curves

Full Agonists
Partial Agonist with IA=0.5
Antagonist

A

Full Agonists reach 100% Effect; full height sigmoid
Middle part near linear

Partial Agonist with IA=0.5 (can be between 0 and 1)
Only reaches 50% Effect; half sized sigmoid
Less steep–> larger margin of safety

Antagonist
Line at bottom; doesn’t reach any effect

Potency Rank:
A, B> C

C will require higher dose for still lower effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Parameters of Concentration- Response Curve

A

Maximum of curve= efficacy
Expressed by IA
Clinical sig: determines how severe symp/ diseases
can be treated.
More severe–> need more efficacious drug

Position of curve along conc/dose axis: Potency
   Conc/dose req to induce given effect
   Drug needing lower conc is more potent
   EC 50 (conc) or ED50 (dose)
   Determines dosing: less potent-> higher conc needed

Slope of near-linear middle part of curve
Indicated how large increase of effect prod. by
increasing conc.
Related to margin of safety: steeper- smaller margin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Affinity
Potency
Efficacy
Intrinsic Activity

A

Affinity
Binding tendency of a ligand
Inversely proportional to Kd
Can only be compared when drugs bind same R

Potency
Conc. of dose req to induce given effect
Lower dose-> higher potency; characterised by ED50
Dep on affinity, signal amplification, R density, intrinsic
efficacy

Efficacy
Max of curve, max effect provoked by drug
Expressed by IA
Dep on intrinsic efficacy, signal amplification, R density

Intrinsic Activity
(Max Effect Inducible by drug) / (max effect possible in
given tissue)
Range 0-1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Receptor Reserve

A

Max effect that can be elicited with submaximal R occupancy: R reserve is fraction of Rs that are apparently not req for maximal effect

May be due to
High signal amplification during signal transduction
High R density
(High intrinsic efficacy of agonist)

Receptor downreg doesn’t decrease max. effect of full agonist (until certain limit)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Effect of R down-regulation on full agonist

A

Decrease in potency and efficacy

Sigmoid curve decreases in size and shifts to right (need higher concentration)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Intrinsic Efficacy

A

Describes receptor activating ability/ power of agonist

Describes how efficiently R occupancy translates into effect

Higher intrinsic efficacy-> increase efficacy until max possible effect of tissue reached
After: appearance and increase in receptor reserve

On curve:
Increased intrinsic efficacy-> shift to the left

Unlike IA: doesn’t have upper value: suitable to distinguish between R activating abilities of full agonists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Factors determining effect of an agonist

A

Number of activated Rs

Intrinsic efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Agonist specific parameters

A

Agonist conc
Affinity (Kd)
Intrinsic efficacy

17
Q

Tissue specific parameters

A

Receptor density

Signaling amplification