Chapters 8,9,10 Flashcards

1
Q

what if we want to study a subject variable?

A

this would be a correlational study, when randomization between groups is not possible but we still want to focus on the effect of a manipulated IV we use: preexperimental designs, quasi-experimental designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

one shot study

A

one group is tested only once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why would we use a one shot study?

A

initial explanation of a new phenomenon or intervention, gives researcher a basic understanding of the potential effects before conducting more complex experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

nonequivalent group design

A

static group design, no random assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why use static group design?

A

main reason is to evaluate the effect of a treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

pretest-posttest design

A

one group of people is tested twice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

quasi experiment

A

adding more observations and/or more comparison groups, lets us make more conclusions with greater confidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design

A

using an experimental group with a comparable but not equivalent control group, both groups are tested before and after the introduction of the IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

time-series design

A

used when there is no appropriate nonequivalent group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

multiple time-series design

A

combination of the time-series design and the pretest-posttest design with nonequivalent groups, multiple observations of the experimental group and nonequivalent group, makes the best out of a less than ideal situation, groups are not equivalent but they are made as comparable as can reasonably be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

factorial designs

A

a design that assess the effect of two or more independent variables (also called factors) on a dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

asking questions

A

will the type of feedback impact the participants self-confidence regarding their ability to do something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

hypotheses

A

with this in mind, you really have 2 alternative hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

IV and levels

A

can be multiple independent variables and they can have different levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

main effects

A

the effect that each factor has on the dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

think of it this way:

A

it’s almost like conducting two separate studies at once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what about the prediction?

A

the researcher predicts a significant main effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

why is that okay?

A

researchers need to make predictions about every possible effect in a study, but it is important to be aware of potential effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

interaction effect

A

the effect that two or more factors have in combination of the DV, is each level of the IV affected the same way by the other IV or are they affected differently?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

marginal means and main effects

A

the mean score for each level of an IV collapsed across the other IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

some things to consider

A

demand characteristics, will the participant be able to guess the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

interpreting main effects

A

most common to examine factorial design using: ANOVA, analysis of variance, statistical procedure that compares means between groups, tells us if main effect and/or interactions are significant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

watch out for interactions

A

with main effects they ignore all other factors, if there is no significant effect you can generalize the main effect to each level of that IV, if there is a significant interaction effect you must be careful with how you interpret the main effects

24
Q

mixed designs

A

factorial design that also has within group factors

25
Q

observational studies

A

like people watching, main difference: observational studies require forethought and planning, when conducted properly observational studies can provide lots of information that we simply wouldn’t get from casual people watching

26
Q

why use them?

A

starting point for research on a new topic, can help to save time and money to make some observations before jumping into a full-fledged experiment

27
Q

research in natural settings

A

two types of research in natural settings

28
Q

field experiments

A

controlled experiments involving random assignment and manipulation of an IV conducted in a natural setting

29
Q

observational studies investigations

A

involving no manipulation of the IV

30
Q

naturalistic observation studies

A

unobtrusively observing behaviors in the natural setting, the investigator does nothing to interfere with the participants behavior, participants often do not know they are being observed

31
Q

habituation

A

researcher appears in the same setting numerous times until their presence no longer appears to affect the participants behavior

32
Q

desensitization

A

when the researcher uses some efforts to reduce the effect of their presence

33
Q

reactivity

A

participant might change their behavior if they know their being watched

34
Q

participant observation studies

A

the researcher is an active participant in the situation

35
Q

undisguised participant study

A

participants are aware that the researcher is observing their behavior

36
Q

disguised participant study

A

other participants do not know the researcher is observing their behavior

37
Q

considerations for participant observation studies

A

observations by the researcher can be subject to enhanced bias

38
Q

field experiments

A

controlled studies that occur in a natural setting, researcher manipulates an IV and measures its effect on the DV

39
Q

bystander effect field experiments

A

watching how other people act

40
Q

pros of field experiments

A

higher ecological validity, specific aspect of external validity, demand characteristics are less of an issue

41
Q

ecological validity

A

the extent to which the conditions, settings, and tasks within an experiment accurately represent the real-world that the research is meant to investigate

42
Q

cons of field experiments

A

extraneous variables are harder to control for, ethical issues, lack of informed consent, sometimes have poorer reliability than lab studies due to lack of precise replication in a natural environment

43
Q

observer influence

A

reactivity of participants if they know they are being studied

44
Q

observer bias

A

a persons conscious or unconscious preferences can affect their perception of a situation

45
Q

data collection

A

first decide what variable you are measuring and how to measure it

46
Q

interobserver reliability

A

teh degree to which a measurement procedure yields consistent results when used by different observers

47
Q

narrative records

A

running records of behavior in a given situation, can be handwritten notes, audio recordings, video recordings, can code and organize the findings of these records

48
Q

more subjective narrative records

A

can be good for gathering preliminary data, best suited for generating hypotheses

49
Q

more objective narrative records

A

good for obtaining more faithful descriptions of behaviors, best suited for testing hypotheses

50
Q

static checklists

A

used to record characteristics that will not change during the course of the observations

51
Q

action checklist

A

used to record the presence of absence of behaviors over a period of time

52
Q

behavior sampling

A

a researcher observes subsets of a participants behavior at different times and/or in different situations

53
Q

time sampling

A

the times at which observations will be made are chosen in effort to obtain a representative sample of behaviors

54
Q

random time sampling

A

each interval of time has equal chance to be chosen

55
Q

systematic time sampling

A

specific time intervals are chosen purposefully

56
Q

event sampling

A

best used when behaviors don’t occur on a continuous basis

57
Q

situation sampling

A

observations are made in different settings and curcumstances