Chapters 5&6 Flashcards
Role of the board
Take major policy and strategic decisions (mergers, acquisitions, financing)
- monitoring and even dismissing the chief executive
- overseeing strategy
- monitoring risks and control systems
- monitoring human capital
- ensuring effective communications with stakeholders
- developing corporate social responsibilities and ensuring they’re met
The board of any company are expected to be
directors should have relevant expertise and there should be a mix of experience on the board
- independent (pursuing company interests above own)
- objective (capable of rationale and bias free decision making)
- sceptical (question info given to them)
- resourceful (capable of innovative leadership)
Shareholders and boards
- shareholders of a listed company = most important so directors run company on their behalf . They only become involved at a very high level. If they’re dissatisfied with the performance of the board, they can exercise their power by voting on the re election of the current exec team.
UK model of corporate governance and board structure (single board)
Single/Unitary board
- mix of exec and non exec directors; mix is down to company but best practice = 50% should be subject to annual re-election
Advantages
- NED’s = bring considerable expertise to the board and are empowered and more active
- compromise is sought as no extreme decisions are presented
- better collective decision making
- wider involvement -> reduced instances of fraud and malpractice
- higher investor confidence
European countries = Dual board structure
Supervisory Board (reviews company direction/strategy and responsible for safeguarding stakeholders' interests and appoints the management board) Management Board (composed entirely of managers)
Advantages
+ power separation between managers and those that control for shareholders
+ implicit shareholder involvement
+ more independent thinking as separate meetings are hold
+ managers are empowered
Disadvantages
- Dilution of power and confusion
- extra bureaucracy
- supervisory board are remote
- the agency problem occurs when they act on behalf of each other
- lack of transparency over appointments to the supervisory board
Development of corporate governance?
cadbury - stock exchange and split roles of board directors
Greenbury - director remuneration
turnbull - directors and internal control systems
Higgs - role of the NED’s
Tyson - NED’s recruitment and development
smith - auditors/ committees
sir David walker and the FRC - complete review and renamed to UK Corporate governance code
Stock market listing rules
Companies must COMPLY OR EXPLAIN in their annual report. The statement of how the company complied with the main principles of the UK corporate governance code and the instances of non compliance with explanations. Its then up to the shareholders to decide if they’re satisfied THEREFORE UK CORP GOVERNANCE is voluntary.
Principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code
LEARR Leadership Effectiveness Accountability Remuneration Relations with stakeholders
Leadership
- board should be effective and accept collective responsibility
- a division of responsibility is required; no person to have unfettered powers
- chairman to be leading the board
- NED’s to constructively challenge and help develop strategy
Effectiveness
- Board to have a balance of skill, experience, knowledge, independence
- a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure for appointing directors
- directors should commit sufficient time to the role
- directors should refresh and develop their skills and knowledge
- boards should be supplied with quality info on a timely basis
- the board should rigorously appraise its own performance annually
- all directors to be subject to annual re-elections
Accountability
- boards should present a balanced and understandable assessment of the company’s position
- board should maintain sound risk management and internal control systems
- audit committee should maintain an appropriate relationship with the company’s auditors
Remuneration
- Exec Directors Remuneration should be designed to promote the long term success of the company. Performance related elements should be transparent, stretching and rigorously applied
- no director should be involved in setting their own pay
- should be enough to attract, retain and motivate directors but not excessive
as linked to performance
Relations with shareholders
- boards should maintain a dialogue with shareholders based on a mutual understanding of objectives
- the AGM should be used to communicate with investors (ensuring a satisfactory dialogue takes place with investors)
how countries decide between comply/explain principles based vs rules based
- what the dominant ownership structure of companies is
- the nature of its legal system and its power and ability to interfere with how companies run
- how the gov is structured
- state of the economy
- culture and history
- capital/investment
- general global political/economical environment
Advantages disadvantages of rules based to corporate governance (opposite for corporate gov to rules based)
+ clarity of what to do
+ binding and penalties
+ deterrent for poor governance
+ confidence in compliance
- legal loopholes
- less flexibility
- increased regulation
- box ticking approach
Codes for public sector / not for profit organisations
The Good Governance Standard for Public Services
- organisational purpose
- clearly functions/roles
- promoting values
- informed, transparent decisions and managing risk
- capacity/capability
- engaging stakeholders
The Code of Governance for the Voluntary and Community Sector 7 Principles;
- board leadership
- board In control
- high performance board
- board review/renewal
- board delegation
- board/trustee intregrity
- board openness
Advantages and disadvantages of governance codes
+ improved performance
+ access to investment (global investors may pay premium)
+ reduced fraud
+ risk reduction
- reduced competitiveness
- can limit but not prevent fraud
- restriction on director power
- increased bureaucracy
- reactionary to corporate failures and not proactive about potential issues
NED’s exert their power through sitting on 3 committees…
Audit
Appointments/Nominations
Remuneration
\+ reduces board workload \+ improved decision making \+ directors take big decisions seriously \+ improved shareholder confidence \+ risk/remuneration are important \+ compliance with codes etc
Audit Committee
- NEDS entirely atleast 2 for smaller businesses and 3 for larger with at least 1 with recent/relevant financial experience
- chaired by an independent NED who cannot also be the chairperson of the board
- meet x3 a year and at least one meeting with the the auditors without the executive directors
- responsible for the organisations controls/overseeing internal and external audits.
- first required by cadbury code
- appointing/compensating/overseeing external auditors
- monitoring the accounts
- reviewing internal controls
- risk management systems
- considering the external auditors independence and objectivity
- approving non audit work awarded to external auditors
- reviewing internal auditors work
- reviewing whistleblowing procedures
Appointments/Nominations Committee
Majority should be independent NED’s
Help determine the structure of the board and appoint new executive directors.
- reviewing the size structure composition of the board
- considering the balance between exec and independent NEDs
- ensuring diversity
- providing appropriate balance of power between CEO and Chair
-evaluating the skills, knowledge, experience of board
-succession planning
-preparing job descriptions
- identifying new appointees to the board
- recommending whether directors should be reappointed
- act independent by shareholders
Remuneration Committee
Primary role in determining the general remuneration policy and the specific remuneration packages for each director.
- seen to be independent all NEDs
- clear policy accepted by shareholders
- performance packages are aligned long term
- clear/concise reporting
- determining and reviewing policies
- monitoring senior manager levels
- detailed remuneration for executives
- exec/key management fairly rewarded
- agreeing compensation for loss of office
- establishing a pension policy for board members
recommendations are put to a non-binding shareholder vote at least every 3 years
USA Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX)
- rules based approach
- complied with by all US companies, directors of subsidiaries of US listed companies and auditors working with US listed companies
- all companies must provide a signed certificate from the CEO confirming accuracy of their financial statements
- CEO and CFO must repay any bonuses received in the last 12 months of statements are restated
- senior audit partner must be rotated at least every 5 years
- 5 member board Public Company Oversight Board was established
- regulations on off balance sheet reporting have been tightened
- directors are prohibited
from dealing in their own company shares during sensitive times - must have an audit committee to trade