Chapter_4_Professional and Social Responsibility of Social Scientists Flashcards

Week 3

1
Q

Consequences of Error

A
  • Harm to Research Participants
  • Harm to Science
  • Harm to the Public
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Incompetence

A

a lack of ability to design internally valid research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Subject Matter Competence

A

Without this -> unable to formulate research questions of theoretical or applied value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Questionable Research Practices During Data Collection and Analysis

A
  1. Data dredging
  2. Data snooping
  3. Data trimming
  4. Data torturing
  5. Methodological Tuning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Data Dredging

A

Collecting data on a large number of variables but focusing only on the statistically significant relations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Data Snooping

A

checking results for statistical significance during data collection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Data trimming

A

discarding data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Data torturing

A

including or excluding potential moderator variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Methodological Tuning

A

Tweaking the study methodology -> significance is found

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Questionable Research Practices During Data Interpretation and Reporting

A
  1. Accentuating the positive
  2. HARKing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Accentuating the Positive

A
  • Being more critical of results that are inconsistent with one’s hypotheses than of results that are consistent with the hypotheses
  • Focusing one’s attention on statistically significant findings while ignoring nonsignificant findings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

HARKing

A

Hypothesizing After Results are Known

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Correcting Mistakes and Errors

A
  • publication of the new result effectively corrects the previous error
  • print a correction or retraction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Data Forgery

A

Report the results of experiments that were never conducted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dealing With Research Misconduct

A
  1. informal interventions
  2. formal interventions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Authorship Credit

A

The person made a significant scientific contribution to the research

17
Q

Duplicated Publication

A

Publish the same work in different journals

18
Q

Acceptable Practices of Duplicated Publication

A
  1. Convention - Journal
  2. Technical article - Nontechnical outlet
  3. Journal - Report or edited book
19
Q

Piecemeal Publication

A

Taking the data from a single study and breaking it into pieces to increase the number of resulting publications

20
Q

Plagiarism

A

The act of taking someone else’s work or ideas and passing them off as one’s own

21
Q

2 Forms of Plagiarism

A
  1. Violation of copyright law
  2. Text recycling
22
Q

Avoiding Plagiarism

A
  • Keep careful RECORDS of sources of information
  • CITE sources correctly
  • PARAPHRASING and summarizing
  • DIFFERENTIATE between others’ ideas and your own ideas
  • PERMISSION for long quotations, table, or figure
23
Q

Misapplied Knowledge

A
  • Exploitation: manipulation
  • Wasting Resources
  • Overgeneralization
  • Failure to Apply the Results of Research
24
Q

Societal Mentor

A

to be a neutral advice giver, reviewing all the scientific evidence on both sides of an issue and pointing out the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence on each side

25
Social Activist
advocates one side of an issue and uses science as a tool for gaining implementation of social policies in line with his or her personal values
26
The Limits of Behavioral Science Knowledge
1. outcomes of a policy decision, people can disagree over the CRITERIA 2. researchers’ personal VALUES can influence their interpretations of research findings
27
The Expert Witness
- COMPETENCE through education, training, and experience - No personal VALUE - All and only RELEVEANT information to questions - Solid EMPIRICAL basis - IMPARTIAL, unbiased manner.
28
Researchers’ Responsibilities
1. Conducting Research - should not conduct for exploitation 2. Reporting the Results of Research - don't report if it'll be misused - minimize misinterpretation 3. Monitoring the Use of Scientific Knowledge - speak out misapplied research