Chapter19: Drifting Toward Disunion Flashcards
Why did Stowe write Uncle Tom’s Cabin?
Dismayed by the passage of the Fugitive Slave Law, she was determined to awaken the North to the wickedness of slavery by laying bare its terrible inhumanity, especially the cruel splitting of families.
The deeper sources of Stowe’s antislavery sentiments lay what?
in the evangelical religious crusades of the Second Great Awakening
What was the fame of Stowe’s novel?
~The success of the novel at home and abroad was sensational.
~Several hundred thousand copies were published in the first year
~was translated into more than a score of languages.
It was also put on the stage in “Tom shows” for lengthy runs.
~To millions of people, it made slavery appear almost as evil as it really was
What was the effect of Stowe’s novel?
~The truth is that Uncle Tom’s Cabin did help start the Civil War—and win it.
~ Uncounted thousands of readers swore that they would have nothing to do with the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law
~Boys in Blue who volunteered to fight the Civil War
~governments in London and Paris seriously considered intervening in behalf of the South, but they were sobered by the realization that many of their own people, aroused by the “Tom-mania,” might not support them
Was Stowe’s writing an unfair indictment?
Stowe had never witnessed slavery at first hand in the Deep South, but she had seen it briefly during a visit to Kentucky, and she had lived for many years in Ohio, a center of Underground Railroad activity
What was The Impending Crisis of the South by Hinton Helper about?
Hating both slavery and blacks, he attempted to prove by an array of statistics that indirectly the nonslaveholding whites were the ones who suffered most from the millstone of slavery. Unable to secure a publisher in the South, he finally managed to find one in the North.
What was effect of The Impending Crisis of the South by Hinton Helper?
Helper’s influence was negligible among the
poorer whites to whom he addressed his message. His book, with its “dirty allusions,” was banned in the South, where book-burning parties were held. But in the North, untold thousands of copies, many in condensed form, were distributed as campaign literature by the Republicans.
Where was the worst possible workings of popular sovereignty?
Kansas
Who were the newcomers who ventured into Kansas?
Most of the northerners were just ordinary westward-moving pioneers in search of richer lands beyond the sunset. But a small part of the inflow was financed by groups of northern abolitionists or free-soilers
What was the New England Emigrant Aid Co?
And what did they carry with them?
The most famous of these antislavery ~organizations was the New England Emigrant Aid Company, which sent about two thousand people to the troubled area to forestall the South—and also to make a profit.
~many of them carried the deadly new breech-loading Sharps rifles, nicknamed “Beecher’s Bibles” after the Reverend Henry Ward Beecher (Harriet Beecher Stowe’s brother), who had helped raise money for their purchase.
How did Southerns feel about Kansas?
They had supported the Kansas-Nebraska scheme of Douglas with the unspoken understanding that Kansas would become slave and Nebraska free.
Why was it a losing game to plant blacks in Kansas?
slaves were valuable and volatile property,
and foolish indeed were owners who would take them where bullets were flying and where the soil might be voted free under popular sovereignty
When the day came in 1855 to elect members of the first territorial legislature, what happened?
proslavery “border ruffians” poured in from Missouri to vote early and often.
How was there two governments in Kansas?
The South “won” the election for Kansas to become a slave state and set up a government at Shawnee Mission.
Free-soilers cried foul and set up their own government in Topeka.
Thus, after the election, there were two governments: one slave and based on a bogus election, and one free and illegitimate.
What was the prelude to a bloodier tragedy?
The breaking point came in 1856 when a gang of pro-slavery raiders, alleging provocation, shot up and burned a part of the free-soil town of Lawrence
What did John Brown do at Pottawatomie Creek?
In May 1856, The violence continued when John Brown and men set out for revenge for Lawrence. At Pottawatomie Creek he killed and chopped up 5 slavery supporters.
Altogether ,what did the Kansas conflict do?
destroyed millions of dollars’ worth of property, paralyzed agriculture in certain areas, and cost scores of lives.
What was the Lecompton Constitution?
The proslavery forces, then in the saddle, devised a tricky document known as the Lecompton Constitution. The people were not allowed to vote for or against the constitution as a whole, but for the constitution either “with slavery” or “with no slavery.” If they voted against slavery, one of the remaining provisions of the constitution would protect the owners of slaves already in Kansas. So whatever the outcome, there would still be black bondage in Kansas.
What was Pres. James Buchanan stance on the Lecompton Constitution?
Blind to sharp divisions within his own Democratic party, Buchanan threw the
weight of his administration behind the notorious Lecompton Constitution
Pres. James Buchanan gave his approval, but the Senate had to approve the Constitution.
What was Douglass stance on the Lecompton Constitution?
But Senator Douglas, who had championed true popular sovereignty, would have none of this semipopular fraudulency. Deliberately tossing away his strong support in the South for the presidency, he fought courageously for fair play and democratic principles.
Overall results of Lecompton Constitution?
The end results were (a) the Democratic party was terribly divided, (b) Kansas was now left in limbo—somewhere in between a territory and a state, and (c) the slavery question was still not answered.
What happened to Demo party?
President Buchanan, by antagonizing the numerous Douglas Democrats in the North, hopelessly divided the once-powerful Democratic party. Until then, it had been the only remaining national party for the Whigs were dead and the Republicans were
sectional.
Senator Charles Sumner of MA on the floor of Senate in 1856?
was a leading abolitionist—one of the few prominent in political life. Highly educated but cold, humorless, intolerant, and egotistical, he had made himself one
of the most disliked men in the Senate. Brooding over the turbulent miscarriage of popular sovereignty, he delivered a blistering speech titled “The Crime Against Kansas.”
He also referred insultingly to South Carolina and to its white-haired Senator Andrew Butler, one of the best-liked members of the Senate
How did Congressman Preston S. Brooks of South Carolina took vengeance?
he resented the insults to his state and to its senator, a distant cousin. His code of honor called for a duel, but in the South one fought only with one’s social equal. On May 22, 1856, he approached Sumner, then
sitting at his Senate desk, and pounded the orator with an eleven-ounce cane until it broke. The victim fell bleeding and unconscious to the floor, while several nearby senators refrained from interfering.
Effect of Sumner-Brooks Affair?
House of Representatives could not muster enough votes to expel the South Carolinian, but he resigned and was triumphantly reelected. Southern admirers deluged Brooks with canes, some of them gold-headed, to replace the one that had been broken. The injuries to Sumner’s head and nervous system
were serious. He was forced to leave his seat for three and a half years and go to Europe for treatment that was both painful and costly.
What did The Sumner-Brooks clash and the ensuing reactions reveal?
how dangerously inflamed passions
were becoming, North and South.
Election of 1856 nominees ?
Democrats met in Cincinnati to nominate James Buchanan.
Delegates of the fast-growing Republican party met in Philadelphia to nominate Fremont, so-called Pathfinder of the West.
The Republican platform came out
vigorously against the extension of slavery into the territories, while the Democrats declared no less emphatically for popular sovereignty.