Chapter 9: Relationships Flashcards
What are the 7 ways that an exiting relationship changes negotiation dynamics?
- negotiating within relationships takes place over time (i.e. alternate holidays w the in-laws)
- negotiation is a way to learn more about the other party and increase interdependence (finding commonality)
- Resolution of simple distributive issues has implications for the future (creating unintended precedents for the future)
- Distributive issues within relationship negotiations can be emotionally hot (anger, emotional baggage)
- Negotiating within relationships may never end, which can result in different consequences
- the other is the focal problem (one party’s existence, preference, lifestyle, or behavior can irritate the other)
- relationship preservation can be the overarching negotiation goal; parties make concessions on substantive issues to preserve the relationship
What are the consequences of negotiating within relationships that may never end?
- parties may defer negotiations over tough issues in order to start on the right foot
- attempting to anticipate the future and negotiate everything up front is often impossible
- issues on which parties truly disagree may never go away (i.e. messy/clean person)
Define relational identity theory.
groups often function like a “tribe”, drawn together by a strong common identity that creates such rigid boundaries around it that most efforts at using traditional techniques to resolve the dispute are almost predestined to fail
What are the key elements in managing negotiations within relationships?
trust, reputation, and fair treatment are the most salient
What are some important things about reputations?
- highly subjective in nature
- can have a number of different, even conflicting, reputations
- shaped by past behavior
- influenced by an individual’s personal characteristics and accomplishments
- develop over time but hard to change once developed
- others’ reputations can shape emotional states and expectations
- negative reputations are difficult to “repair”
What are some individual antecedents of trust in negotiation?
- people generally start with high levels of trust
- individual motives shape expectations of trust
- some individuals have greater disposition to trust; others don’t
- emotions contribute to trust or distrust- anger contributes to distrust and competitive behavior
What are some situational antecedents of trust in negotiation?
- nature of negotiation process shapes trust expectations. People who expect distributives negotiations are less trusting than parties who expect integrative negotiations.
- face-to-face negotiations encourage greater trust development
- negotiators representing other interest are less trustworthy
What are some outcomes of trust?
- cooperative behavior
- enhances sharing of information
- better outcomes
- more communication and understanding
- parties who trust less tend to argue and justify their own preferences and listen less
What makes an apology effective?
- verbal statement recognizing trust breach is better than not making any comment
- time dependent; sooner is better
- sincerity
- taking personal responsibility instead of blaming external circumstances
- if the situation was an isolated event
- if it wasn’t caused by deceptive behavior (i.e. lies, bluffs, misinformation)
What are the four types of justice?
distributive, procedural, interactional, and systemic
What is distributive justice?
distribution of outcomes; outcomes should be fair and distributed equally (i.e. split the difference)
What is procedural justice?
process of determining outcomes (i.e. parties may be concerned they were not treated fairly during the negotiation)
What is interactional justice?
how parties treat each other in one-to-one relationships
What is systemic justice?
about how organizations appear to treat groups of individuals and the norms that develop for how they should be treated (i.e. discrimination, disfranchised groups)
What is the procedural justice effect?
parties involved in shaping a negotiation are more committed to that decision