Chapter 9 - Recognizing the Importance of Race Flashcards
Ethnic group
Share the same cultural heritage Ex. African American, Jamaican American, Cucan American, Irish American, etc.
Race
Wisely recognized as a social construction that varies over time and from one society to another.
Today, sociologists define race as a group of people perceived to be distinct because of physical appearance (not genetic makeup). Typically based on skin tone and facial features.
Human Genome Project
“There us only one race - the human race”
Made it clear that there are more genetic differences within racial groups than between them.
All humans share common ancestors and 99.9% of the same genetic makeup.
Differences in “racial” appearance result from adaptations to different environmental conditions.
The “One-Drop Rule.”
In the early twentieth century, as states began to codify practices of segregating the races, many states began to distinguish Whites and Blacks using the “one-drop rule,” meaning that if you had any trace of Black racial heritage, you were Black. Starting with the 1930 U.S. census, census workers were instructed to categorize anyone with any “Negro” blood as Negro, and they continued to do so until individuals began to categorize themselves in 1970.
The Act to Preserve Racial Integrity in 1924
All residents of Virginia were required to complete this form. Acts like these worked to uphold the “one-drop rule.”
The 2000 U.S. census was the first to allow respondents to identify with more than one race.
The state of Louisiana officially modified its one-drop rule, albeit just slightly, in 1970, when it passed a law that declared that anyone 1/32 or more Black (meaning that they had one Black great-great-great-grandparent) was Black.
Susie Guillory Phipps
In 1977, Phipps, a seemingly White homemaker married to a wealthy White man, applied for a passport for an upcoming trip her husband had planned for them. To her horror, she was told that she would not be granted the passport because she had indicated that her race was different from that listed on her birth certificate. Phipps learned that she had been classified as “colored” on her birth certificate.
Frightened at the thought of what his reaction might be if he found out her birth certificate identified her as colored, Phipps told her husband she couldn’t travel because she was ill. She then proceeded (secretly at first, using her “wife allowance” and writing cashier’s checks) to sue the state, asking it to change her race on her birth certificate. When she finally did tell her husband—after five years—he supported her efforts, arguing that she was White and that her birth certificate should indicate it.
Ultimately, Phipps lost. The state traced her lineage back 222 years and discovered that one of her great-great-great-great-grandmothers was a Black slave and that some more recent ancestors had some Black ancestry. The court determined that she was 3/32 Black and ruled against her request.
Prejudice
Irrational feelings toward members of a particular group
Discrimination
Unfair treatment of groups of people
Racism
Not to be confused with racial prejudice.
Encompasses historical, cultural, institutional, and interpersonal dynamics that create and maintain a racial hierarchy that advances whites and hurts people of color.
People of all races can hold racial stereotypes and be prejudiced against individual members of racial groups.
Only members of dominant racial groups can be racist. Racism requires prejudice and institutional power.
Institutional discrimination
Happens as a result of how institutions operate.
Can exist even if the people who run them do not feel negatively toward the group(s) hurt. For example, school funding that relies on local taxes may be based on the desire for community control of schools. The result, however, is that schools in poor communities, which are disproportionately attended by students of color, receive less funding than wealthier schools with more White students. The intent to discriminate many not be present; nonetheless, the discrimination (more money for wealthier and Whiter schools) and its negative repercussions exist.
Three-fifth compromise
Treated slaves as three-fifths of a person for purposes of representation in the House of Representatives and taxation.
Thirteenth amendment
Abolished slavery after the Civil War
Hayes-Tilden Compromise of 1877
1876 presidential election between Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican (northern) presidential candidate, and Samuel J. Tilden, the Democratic (southern) presidential candidate, was deadlocked, with Tilden receiving more of the popular vote but neither receiving enough electoral votes to win the presidency.
A committee in Congress assigned to break the impasse voted narrowly—the day before the new president was to take office—to give the election to Hayes. The Democrats agreed to go along with the decision if Hayes promised to withdraw federal troops from the former Confederacy and allow Whites to once again dominate political power in the South. Hayes agreed, and Southern states began to establish Jim Crow laws that legally established a racially segregated society.
The Supreme Court upheld these measures with the Plessy v. Ferguson decision in 1896, which ruled that “separate but equal” facilities were constitutional.
Brown v. Board of Education
1954 that the Supreme Court overruled Plessy v. Ferguson
2012). Even after that decision, interracial couples were not allowed to marry. It took another Supreme Court ruling, the Loving v. Virginia decision in 1967, to abolish state laws banning interracial marriage.
Immigration Legislation
Racism also influenced.
Chinese and Japanese immigration were halted, respectively, through the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the Gentlemen’s Agreement of 1907.
Then, a series of laws curtailed immigration of Southern and Eastern Europeans (at the time, they were considered “less than White”), culminating in the Immigration Act of 1924, which established 2 percent immigration quotas per nation, on the basis of the 1890 U.S. census (when relatively few Southern and Eastern Europeans were in the United States).
So, for example, if there were 100,000 Italians residing in the United States in 1890, each year only 2,000 new migrants from Italy would be granted entry.