Chapter 10 - Understanding Institutions: Politics and the Economy Flashcards
State
Max Weber believed that because states come in so many different forms and pursue so many different tasks, it was impossible to define a state by what it does.
States must, therefore, according to Weber, be sociologically defined by the specific and unique means by which they attempt to achieve these ends.
Weber defined the state as “a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory”
This should not be interpreted to mean that the state is the only entity in a given geographical area that uses physical violence, but rather that it is the only entity that may do so legitimately.
Legitimate power
Also called authority, is power exercised in a manner that is supported by the community.
Illegitimate power
Or coercion, is power exercised without the support of the community.
Hobbes’s State of Nature
Before the development of the state or any other form of civil society. Because laws come from society and our concept of private property is defined by law, neither exists in the state of nature. Might makes right, and property belongs to whoever can hold and keep it.
Because so much of the misery inherent to the state of nature Hobbes describes can be blamed on fear of violence, life would improve dramatically if it were eliminated.
This could be accomplished, Hobbes argued, if all people living within a given territory were willing to give up just a few of their rights—specifically, their right to engage in violence.
Hobbes’s Social Contract
Agreement by the people to give up certain individual rights in exchange for protection and other benefits.
Traditional Domination
Based on “the authority of the ‘eternal yesterday”
Means that the legitimacy of an individual’s claim to wield power is based on custom or tradition; the leader’s authority is accepted because that is the way that things have always been done in the past. Ex. Kings and queens
Rational-legal domination
To legitimate their authority draw their power from occupying a legally defined position. Ex. Presidents or prime ministers.
Charismatic domination
Leaders draw their legitimacy from the devotion of their followers and their belief that the leaders possess some sort of extraordinary personal qualities.
Under traditional domination, leaders need no outstanding personal characteristics, or even any basic competence, in order to assume power; the fact that tradition dictates that they are next in line is all that they require. Charismatic leaders, however, must actively do something to earn the devotion of their followers by inspiring them to join some sort of movement, group, or campaign.
The routinization of charisma
Transfer power from a charismatic leader to a system based on either traditional domination or rational-legal domination.
Ex. Fidel Castro in Cuba.
Castro was a charismatic leader who was able to lead a revolution that overthrew the government of Cuba in 1959. However, upon taking power, Castro was able to establish a permanent basis for his power in a new system of rules and laws so that, when he was ready to step down after ruling Cuba in one capacity or another for almost 50 years, the system of rational-legal domination he had established was able to provide stability and continuity in his absence.
Monarchy
States governed through traditional domination. Headed by some sort of individual sovereign such as a king, queen, sultan or empower.
Many associate their reign with the will of the gods.
Divine right of kings
Argued that the king was given his power by God, and thus no mortal man could stand in judgment against him.
Medieval Europe
Democracy
Modern rational-legal societies are generally governed through
Government by the people, but democratic societies vary in exactly how much control the people have over the workings of their government.
Direct Democracy
Whereby citizens directly controlled the entire political process and were actively responsible for making all the decisions of the state, was able to work effectively because of the relatively small number of citizens
Representative democracy
Citizens do not actively vote on every single issue the government must address but instead vote to elect a group of representatives who then make decisions on behalf of the voters who elected them.
These representatives must periodically stand for reelection in order to maintain their positions.
These regular elections are intended to ensure that they faithfully represent the interests of their constituents;
Oligarchy
A type of government in which power is held by a small group of elites.
Any number of factors might serve to distinguish the ruling elites from other members of society.
Plutocracy
Power is held by the economic elites