Chapter 9 Flashcards

1
Q

Correspondence theory of truth

A

A statement is true when it corresponds with reality. Assumes that there is a physical reality which has priority and which the human mind tries to understand. First formulated by Aristotle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Skepticism

A

Philosophical view that does not deny the existence of a physical reality, but denies that humans can have reliable knowledge of it; first formulated by Pyrrho of Ellis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Demarcation

A

Setting and marking the boundaries of a concept; used, for instance, in the philosophy of science to denote attempts to define the specificity of science.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Philosophy of science

A

Branch of philosophy that studies the foundations of scientific research, to better understand the position of scientific research relative to other forms of information acquisition and generation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Logical positivism

A

Philosophical movement in the first half of the 20th century, claiming that philosophy should stop thinking about metaphysics, and instead try to understand the essence of the scientific approach; central tenet was the verification principle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Verificationism

A

Adherence to the principle that a proposition is meaningful only if it can be verified as true or false; with respect to science states that a proposition is scientific only if it can be verified through objective, value-free observation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Falsificationism

A

View within the philosophy of science that statements are scientific only if they can be falsified empirically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Falsification

A

Trying to refute your research hypothesis. To make a statement falsifiable, you need a concrete and testable formulation, one that is specific.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hypothetico-deductive method

A

Model introduced by Popper to understand the scientific method.
1. Start with theory.
2. Deduce predictions from theory.
3. Test these predictions.
4. If these predictions don’t come true: falsify the theory; if they do come true: corroboration (is not verification).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Confirmation bias

A

Tendency people have to search for evidence that confirms their opinions, goes against falsificationism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ad hoc modifications

A

Modifications to a theory that according to Popper make the theory less falsifiable; decrease the scientific value of the theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Paradigm

A

Notion introduced by Kuhn to refer to the fact that scientists share a set of common views of what the discipline is about and how problems must be investigated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Degenerative research program

A

Notion introduced by Lakatos to indicate a paradigm that does not allow researchers to make new predictions that requires an increasing number of ad hoc modifications to account for the empirical findings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Progressive research program

A

Notion introduced by Lakatos to indicate a paradigm that allows researchers to make new, hitherto unexpected predictions that can be tested empirically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Realism

A

View within philosophy that human knowledge tries to reveal real things in the world; the truth of knowledge is determined by the correspondence of the knowledge with the real world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Idealism

A

View within philosophy that human knowledge is a construction of the mind and does not necessarily correspond to an outside world; the truth of knowledge depends on coherence with the rest of the knowledge in the social group.

17
Q

Postmodernist

A

In the philosophy of science, someone who questions the special status of science and sees scientific explanation as stories told by a particular group of scientists.

18
Q

Social construction

A

Notion used by postmodernists to indicate that scientific knowledge is not objective knowledge discovering the workings of an external reality, but a story told by a particular scientific community on the basis of its language and culture.

19
Q

Science wars

A

Notion used by the postmodernists to refer to their attacks against special status of science and their unmasking of scientific knowledge as a social construction

20
Q

Pragmatism

A

View within philosophy that human knowledge is information about how to cope with the world; the truth of knowledge depends on the success one has in engaging with the world, on what works.

21
Q

Science’s claim of superiority was based on four principles

A
  1. Realism: There is a physical world with independent objects, which can be understood by human intellect.
  2. Objectivity: Knowledge of the physical reality does not depend on the observer. Consequently, ‘objective’ agreement among people is possible, irrespective of their worldviews. Science aims to uncover this knowledge so that it becomes public, verifiable and useable.
  3. Truth: Scientific statements are true when they correspond to the physical reality.
  4. Rationality: Truth is guaranteed because scientific statements are based on sound method. Scientific statements are not arbitrary guesses, but justified conclusions grounded on convincing evidence and good reasoning, and expressed with the right level of confidence.
22
Q

Why did a group of philosophers and scientists decide to revisit the specificity of scientific method in the early 20th century? And what they did decide to do after this?

A
  1. Science’s power had been demonstrated
  2. Euclidian geometry was not the only possible geometry
  3. The major advances in knowledge about logical reasoning.
    Because of this scientists has decided to find its demarcation criteria, the lines that would define science and its borders. Philosophy of science, the new branch of science, is the one dealing with questions related to the status and the uniqueness of science.
23
Q

What was concluded in the 1929 manifesto?

A
  • Truth divides into empirical truths and logical truths
  • Empirical truths make claims about the world and are established through empirical verification (observation and experiment)
  • Logical truths are based on deductive logic and are influenced by linguistic conventions
  • Statements not belonging to either are meaningless.
24
Q

What cycle did the logical positivist propose?

A
  1. Observation
  2. Translation into general conclusion by induction to form a mathematical law
  3. Verification of the general conclusion (demarcation)
25
Sense data
According to the logical positivists, these neutral experiences gained through sensory perception. These are assumed to be neutral, so they can serve as a foundation for science. Verification is the comparison of descriptions of observation (observation sentences) with these sense data. Theoretical statements are verified through observation sentences.
26
Problems with verifiability (5)
1. Theoretical concepts are richer. 2. Theory-ladenness of observation. 3. Underdetermination of theory by data. 4. Induction. 5. Unobservable entities.
27
Corroborated theory
A corroborated theory is one that is strong because it survive risky tests (but it is not accepted).
28
What is Popper's context of discovery and justification?
- Context of discovery: There is no logic for theory development. - Context of justification: Strict rules for the logic testing: modus tollens).
29
Why does falsification come from rationalism?
We start with theories that spring from the imagination. This means that part of the content of our theories does not come from observation, but from the ratio.
30
What is critical rationalism?
Popper, unlike Plato or Descartes, considers the ratio as fallible.
31
What makes a theory falsifiable?
A precise and and general theory. Precision of what it predicts and generality of what it pertains to.
32
Problems for falsificationism
- There is no clear distinction between better supported and less supported theories. At best, theories are 'not yet refuted'. Hard falsification is impossible. - The Duhem-Quine thesis
33
Kuhn's stages
- Pre-science: No agreement about research questions and methods. Creation of paradigm: A paradigm develops, pointing toward what is interesting to study using certain methods - Normal science: If a finding does not fit the dominant paradigm, an attempt will be made to change the theory. - Anomalies and crisis: Too many results does not fit in the paradigm. - Revolution - Normal science - ...
34
Epistemological anarchism
The philosophical perspective on knowledge that rejects the notion that there are rules to gain knowledge. "Anything goes".
35
Sophisticated falsificationism
Theories should be judged within the context of a research program and should only be abandoned when a better alternative exists.
36
Standpoint theory
A standpoint is a place from which human being views the world.
37
Hidden methodological principles in psychological science (5)
- Epistemic freezing: Choose a way to operationalize your concept and then stick to that. - Testing myopia: Choose a hypothesis and test the hypothesis. But how do we get good theories that provide us hypotheses to test? Data fixation: To progress we need new and surprising data. However, theories explains patterns in data (phenomena). Smallism: To explain we need to dive a level deeper )mind -> brain -> neurons)! Recent philosophy of science: we need explanatory pluralism, according to which explanations at multiple levels are necessary to fully understand the behavior of humans and other animals. - Mirrorism: Our goal should be develop theories that are 'true'.