Chapter 8 - Trust, Justice and Ethics Flashcards
Reputation
the prominence of an organizations brand and perceived quality
- depends on trust and vulnerability
Justice
the perceived fairness of an authority’s decision making
ethics
when employees percieve high levels of ethics, they believe that things are being done the way they “should be” ir “ought to be” done
disposition-based trust
trust rooted in one’s own personality, as opposed to careful assessment of the trustee’s trustworthiness
- has more to do with the trustor (high vs low trust prospensity)
cognition-based trust
trust rooted in a rational assessment of the authority’s trustworthiness
affect-based trust
trust dependent on feelings toward the authoruty that go beyond any rational assessment of trust worthiness
trustworthiness
characeristics or attributes of a trustee that inspire trust
1st dimension of trustworthiness: ability
relatively stable capabilities of people for performing a range of related activities
2nd dimension of trustworthiness: benevolence
the belieft that an authority wants to do good from a trustor, apart from any selfish or profit-centered motives
benevolent authorities
care for employees, concern for well being and sense of loyalty
3rd dimension of trustworthiness: integrity
the perception an authority adheres to a set of values and principles that the trustor finds acceptable
1. sound character
2. keeps promises
3. questions about integrity extend beyond senior management
types of trust explained
affect:more emotional than rational
disposition: genes and early life experiences
cognition: rationally evaulate the plus and minuses of an authority
Justice
observable, behavioural evidence that an authority might be trustworthy
distributive justice
equity vs equlaity vs need
- rewards should be allocated to proper norm
- equity norm is typically judged to be the fairest chpice to maximize the productivity of individal employees
procedural justice
- the perceived fairness of the decision-making process
- voice: employees get to express opinions
- correctability: chance to request an appeal when procedure seems ineffective
- consistency, bias suppression, representativeness and accuracy = neutral and objective
procedural vs distributive
procedural justice tends to be a stronger driver of reactions to authorities than distributive justice