Chapter 8: Trial Procedures Flashcards

1
Q

adversarial system

A

an approach based on two opposing sides, in which each side presents its case in court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

testimony

A

a declaration (ex. by a witness) under oath; a sworn statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

court clerk

A

person who keeps records, files, and processes docs for court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

court recorder

A

person whose job it is to document/record all spoken evidence, comments, questions in the court proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

stay of proceedings

A

court order to stop the trial proceedings until a certain condition is met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

immune

A

exempt, completely protected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

empanelling

A

the selection of a jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

challenge for cause

A

formal objection to a prospective juror for reasons such as the juror’s knowledge of the case or lack of impartiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

peremptory challenge

A

formal objection to a potential juror for which no specific reason is given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

sequester

A

keep jury together and away from non-jurors until it reaches a verdict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

verdict

A

final, formal decision of a trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

arraignment

A

1st stage in criminal trial, court clerk reads charge to the accused and a plea is entered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

direct evidence

A

information (evidence) given by person who witnessed the event in question (ex. testimony by bystander who say assault take place)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

circumstantial evidence

A

information (evidence) that relates only indirectly to the alleged offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

examination-in-chief

A

the first questioning of a witness during court proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

leading question

A

questions prompt witness to give answers wanted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

directed verdict

A

judge’s direction to the jury, after Crown presents its evidence, to find the accused person not guilty b/c the Crown has not proven its case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

surrebuttal

A

evidence presented in court to counteract or disprove evidence in the other party’s rebuttal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

subpoena

A

court doc ordering a person to appear in court for a specific purpose (ex. as a witness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

contempt of court

A

act that is calculated to embarrass, hinder, or obstruct court in its administration of justice, or lessen its dignity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

affirmation

A

witness’s solemn agreement to tell the truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

oath

A

solemn promise or statement that something is true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

perjury

A

act of knowingly giving false evidence in a judicial proceeding with intent to mislead

24
Q

adverse witness

A

person who is contrary or hostile giving testimony under oath in a court

25
voir dire
trial within a trial to decide if certain evidence is admissible
26
self-incrimination
act of implicating oneself in a crime; behaviour indicating one's guilt
27
privileged communications
confidential communications that one can't be required to present in court as evidence (ex. doctor, patient; priest, confessor)
28
minors
people under age of majority (ex. 18)
29
dominant party
party in a position of power over another (ex. doctor and patient)
30
similar fact evidence
info (evidence) that shows that the accused has previously committed a similar offence
31
hearsay evidence
info (evidence) not coming from direct, personal experience or knowledge of witness
32
opinion evidence
based on thoughts of the witness, usually an expert in his or her field (ex. coroner commenting on cause of death)
33
inculpatory
admitting to sth, incriminating; as in inculpatory statement
34
exculpatory
denying sth, clearing of guilt
35
confession
statement by the accused in which he or she admits to the crime or acknowledges that some or all of the charge laid is true
36
summation
for each side in a trial, the formal conclusion, which recapitulates (sums up) key arguments and evidence
37
charge to the jury
after the summations in a trial, a judge's instructions to the jury (ex. review of the facts, points of law)
38
hung jury
jury that cannot come to a unanimous decision in a criminal case
39
credibility
the fact or quality of being believable or reliable
40
legal duty
allow certain people to commit acts that would otherwise be offences (ex. police officer drives over speed limit while chasing suspect)
41
necessity
person commits criminal acts to prevent a greater harm | ex. break into house to stop fire from killing infant
42
automatism
State of a person who is unconscious of what they are doing while capable of action, involuntary behaviour. May be caused by psychological stress. (ex. sleepwalking, convulsions)
43
NCRMD
not criminally responsible due to mental disorder
44
alibi
places the accused somewhere else at the time the offence occurred
45
self-defence
protect yourself, property, people under your protection using force that is reasonable and necessary
46
consent
Defence only permitted if accused could and did consent to the action before injury inflicted. Never used in cases involving firearms, murder, sexual crimes, against people under 14.
47
entrapment
police action/abuse that encourages/aids a person to commit an offence *not recognized as offence, but as abuse by police
48
provocation
Words/actions that are insulting enough to cause an ordinary person lose self-control. Must prove: - wrongful actions/words were used - words/actions enough to make other person lose control - person responded suddenly - person reacted before there was time to cool down
49
duress
threat or use of violence to force a person to do something against their will, illegal coercion *used as a defence if it was an urgent situation of clear/imminent peril when following the law is demonstrably impossible
50
double jeopardy
being tried twice for the same offence after being acquitted or to get a higher sentence (it is prohibited) *new + compelling evidence needed to be retried
51
mental fitness to stand trial
review board determines if accused is fit to stand trial, may be remanded up to 60 days to re-evaluate fitness to stand trial, can get treatment, inquiry held every 2 yrs until accused is tried *may or may not be mentally fit at time of the offence too which could result in lack of mental fitness to stand trial
52
mental fitness at time of the offence
- "disease of mind" when the offence occurred - there is presumption of sanity so insanity must be proven by Crown (incl actus reus and mens rea) before introducing evidence of mental disorder - if not guilty, court holds hearing regarding what to do or review board decides
53
intoxication
cannot form intent b/c under influence of alcohol/drugs needs actus reus and mens rea to be proven (ex. kills someone while drunk so manslaughter instead of first degree murder b/c general intent instead of specific intent)
54
honest mistake
- offender truthfully didn't know they were committing a crime - onus on Crown to prove crime proven intentionally - accused's credibility largely determines if defence succeeds (ex. found in possession of unpaid items while planning to leave establishment)
55
mistake of fact
- committing criminal act w/o knowing all facts that would make the act criminal - 2 conditions: genuine mistake not result of accused neglecting to find out facts, law accepts ignorance of the facts as a defence (ex. buy sth and get counterfeit money w/o knowing, use the bill again and get arrested)