Chapter 8: Torts Flashcards
tort
a breach of a duty owed to another that causes harm
action involved in tort
- a person is harmed by the actions of a business or its employees
- a person is harmed by a product manufactured or distributed by the business
- a business is harmed by the wrongful act of another business or person
negligence-based torts
- wrongdoer owed a duty to the injured party. The legal standard created is often called due care or ordinary care
- the duty of care owed to the injured party wa breached thru some act or omission on the part of the wrongdoer
- There is a causal connection b/t the wrongdoer’s negligent conduct and the resulting harm to the injured party
- injured party suffered actual harm or damage recognized as actionable by law as a result of the negligent conduct
reasonable person
hypothetical person who acts in a reasonable manner under circumstances
causation
the act must have been the cause in fact and the proximate cause of the other’s injury
res ipsa loquitur - the thing speaks for itself
the showing is strong enough to prevent dismissal of the claim w/o further examination.
cause in fact
evidence showing that a defendant’s action or inaction is the actual cause of an injury that would not have occurred but for the defendant’s behavior
sine qua non rule
the injury would not have occurred but for the conduct of the party accused of committing tort
proximate cause
consequence that are too remote or too far removed from negligent conduct will not result in liability
substantial factor test
a legal cause of injury is a cause which is a substantial factor in bringing about the injury
superseding cause
even if negligence occurred, if the causal connection to the resulting harm is broken by an intervening act or event
danger-invites-rescue doctrine
the common law holds the negligent party responsible for the loses suffered by those who attempts to save people who are in danger as the result of the torts of others
Assumption of risk
an injured party who voluntarily assumed the risk of harm arising from the negligent or reckless of conduct of another may not be allowed to recover compensation from such harm
exculpatory clause
.
comparative negligence
damages are reduced by the % of the injuries caused by the plaintiff’s own negligence