chapter 8 short answer Flashcards
Four types of non-reactive research:
Physical evidence analysis:
Content analysis
Existing statistics analysis
Secondary data analysis
What are the steps of Unobtrusive Measures?
Identify physical evidence Systematically count/record Identify and measure other variables Consider alternative explanations for evidence and rule them out Compare variables
Limitations of Physical Evidence
physical evidence measures are indirect
possible privacy violation
Content analysis is useful for
Large volumes of text
Topics studied “at a distance”
Content difficult to see with casual observation
What do you measure for content analysis
page 209
Direction Frequency Intensity Space Prominence
Content Analysis with Visual Material
visual material communicates indirectly
visual images often contain mixed messages and operate at multiple levels of meaning
Visual material is more indirect
- we are looking at, what the character looks like, behaves, sounds
- much more interpretation
We have to give MEANING to this.
How to Conduct Content Analysis Research
Step 1. Formulate a Research Question Step 2. Identify the Text to Analyze Step 3. Decide on Units of Analysis Step 4. Draw a Sample Step 5. Create a Coding System Step 6. Construct and Refine Categories Step 7. Code the Data onto Recording Sheets. Step 8. Data Analysis
Limitations of Content Analysis
content analysis cannot:
determine the truthfulness of an assertion
evaluate aesthetic qualities
interpret content significance
reveal the intentions of the text’s creators
determine the influence of a message on its receivers
Locating Data
many diverse sources
Statistical Abstract of the United States
What are the limitations of Secondary Data Sources
May lack data for your research question
Validity
Topic knowledge
Conducting Ethical Non-Reactive Research INCLUDES:
Protecting people’s privacy
Protecting confidentiality of data
Shouldn’t dig through garbage
Existing statistics can be LIMITED by
missing > collected and lost, ethnicity not fully defined
Reliability > thinking about how its measured
Validity > how do we know what the researchers defined is what we define?