Chapter 8 Mammography Flashcards
cancer detection rates with mammo
-4/1000
mammo views of the breast
craniocaudal
medio-lateral oblique
size and glandularity for average compressed breast
60 mm thick
15 % glandularity
what are microcalcifications
specks of calcium hydroxyapatite that have high attenuation coefficients
why is detection and characterization of microcalcification hard?
small dimension (0.1 mm diameter)
spatial resolution in mammo compared to human eye
superior to human eye at 25 cm viewing distance
how is mammo contrast increased?
using low-energy photons
how is noise reduced?
high radiation intensities at image receptor
digital mammo contrast, noise, and resolution vs other x-ray medical x-ray imaging modality?
mammo is superior
density of calcification vs adipose
fibroglandular vs carcinoma
2.2 g/cm3 vs 0.93 g/cm3 adipose tissue
1.04 g/cm3 fibroglandular vs 1.05 g/cm3 carcinoma
most common target material
molybdenum (Z= 42)
tungsten (Z= 74) is becoming more common, with no characteristic x-ray and more bremstrahlung
focal spot size
0.3 mm
small focal spot 0.1 mm for magnification mammo
why is a berrylium x-ray tube window used?
Z=4
minimizes x-ray beam attenuation
how is heel effect used?
used to increase radiation intensity at chest wall by pointing anode towards nipple
how is spectral shape obtained?
using K-edge filters (Mo, Rh, Ag)
tube voltages in mammo
25-35 kV
-avg x-ray beam energy is governed with the K edge filters
tube currents
100 mA in contact mammography
25 mA in magnification mammo
exposure times
1 s
power loading in mammo
3 kW in contact mammo
<1 kW in magnification mammo
vs CT 100 kW
what do the filters do?
remove low energy x-rays that only contribute to dose
Mo/Mo target/filter
Mo K edge is 20 keV
-filter attenuates photons above K edge
Mo/Rh target/filter
Rh K edge is 23 keV
-allows x-rays up to 23 keV (higher average energy than Mo/Mo)
characteristic Mo x-ray energies
19.6 keV and 17.5 keV
filters used with tungsten targets
Rh or Ag
Ag K-edge is 25 keV
what photons do the filters remove?
low energy photons and those above their k-edge
average energy and HVL of a W/Ag combination vs W/Rh combination
W/Ag is higher
With W targets, the average energy of transmitted photons is always “slightly less than” the K-edge energy of the K-edge filter
beam qualities of W targets vs Mo targets
W is higher
for what breast thickness do we use the different target/filter combinations and what is respective HVL?
Mo/Mo, < 65 MM, hvl 0.35 MM aL
Mo/Rh, > 65 mm, HVL 0.45 mm Al
W/Rh, < 65 mm, HVL 0.5 mm Al
W/Ag, > 65 mm, HVL 0.6 mm Al
scatter to primary ratio
1:1
does PE or compton dominate?
PE, opposite of other radiography
source to image distance
65 cm (shorter than 100 cm in other radiography)
longer SIDs would be unacceptable exposure times; shorter SIDs would increase focal spot blur and distortion
why use breast compression?
-immobilizes breast, minimizing motion blur
-spreads out breast tissue to decrease tissue overlap
-compression brings breast closer to imaging plane, minimizing image magnification and reducing focal spot blur
-compression results in increased penetration, which reduces exposure times and radiation doses
compression force
25-45 lb
grids in mammo
grid ratio 5:1
grid line densities of 50 lines/cm
other radiographic imaging often uses 10:1 grid