Chapter 8- Gov Policy and Int Trade Flashcards
why gov intervene in int trade
- political arguments
- economic arguments
political arguments
- concerned with protecting the interests of certain groups within a nation (normally producers), often at the expense of other groups (normally consumers)
- ex: protecting jobs or producers
economic arguments
- concerned with boosting the overall wealth of a nation (promoting GDP)
- benefits both producers and consumers
Political- arguments why gov intervene in markets
1.) protecting jobs (the most common reason for trade restrictions- threatened by more efficient foreign producers)
2.) protecting industries deemed important for nation security
3.) retaliation for unfair foreign competition
4.) protecting consumers from dangerous products
5.) further the goals of foreign policy- build strong relations or punishment
6.) protecting the human rights of individuals
economic (strategic)- arguments why gov intervene in markets
- The infant industry argument: an industry should be protected until it can develop and be viable and competitive internationally
- snowflakes: when countries govs protect industries within a country and don’t allow to compete, snowflakes are creates which is industries that are not able to compete on the global stage
- assumption around economies of scale - strategic trade policy- first mover advantages- think the new trade theory- the world market will profitably support only a few firms
- govs can help domestic firms overcome barriers to entry into industries where foreign firms have an initial advantage advantage- boeing have limited marketplace (only a few people buying jets)
how do govs intervene
- tariffs
- subsidies
- import quotas and voluntary export restraints
- export tariffs and bans
- local content requirements
- administrative policies
- antidumping policies
tariffs (most popular taxes)
- taxes that govs apply to imports
- these help to protect domestic producers
- not good for consumers bc we absorb the cost
- level playing field for domestic producers by raising price of a good
specific tariffs
levied as a fixed charge- for each unit of a good imported example $3 per barrel of oil
ad valorem tariffs
levied as a proportion of the value of the imported good
subsidies
gov payments to domestic producers
- can help domestic producers compete against low-cost foreign imports
- consumers typically absorb the costs of subsidies
- typically used in agriculture
- subsidies give. farmers extra money for their crops and guarantee a “price floor”
- challenges: could hurt poor countries since they cannot pay farmers subsidies or support agriculture
import quotas
restriction on the quantity of goods that may be imported into the country
- more restrictive than tariffs bc it limits products- may drive demand and prices up
voluntary export restraints (VER)
quotas on trade imposed by the exporting country (typically at the request of the importing country’s gov)
- ex: in 1979 in US, gas lines so long, US went to Japan asking to voluntarily agree to ship cars annually to US
import quotas and voluntary export restraint:
- benefit domestic producers
- raise the price of imported goods
local content requirements.
demand that some specific fraction of a good to be produced domestically
- benefit domestic produces
- consumers face higher prices
- generally benefits domestic producers
- if good is imported, some of the production done in that country to protect workers etc
administrative policies: bureaucratic rules designed to make it difficult for imports to enter a country
antidumping policies
punish foreign firms that engage in dumping protect domestic producers from unfair foreign competition- predator practice
- selling goods below cost of production
- dumping in another country for cheaper