Chapter 8: Foraging behaviour Flashcards
sensory modality
mechanism in which information gets to the animal
what do fish use mechanoreceptors for?
detecting body position and information about water pressure/movement
lateral line system
used by fish for “hearing”, detecting their body position and for information about water pressure/movement. made of neuromasts, which are mechanoreceptors that provide hydrodynamic information
catfish prey tracking research questions
how to nocturnal catfish find food in the dark?
do catfish use chemical or hydrodynamic cues to track prey in the dark?
catfish prey tracking hypothesis
catfish use their lateral line system to detect cues provided by the wake of their prey
catfish prey tracking prediction
catfish will follow the wake of their prey while hunting
catfish prey tracking methods
use infrared video to track movement of both predator and prey
classify movement as path following, head on, or attack on stationary guppy
manipulate lateral line or external gestation, classify hunting success and movement sequences of fish
catfish prey tracking results
intact catfish relied mostly on wake following
lateral line inhibited (ablated) fish used a head on attack mode. hunting success SEVERELY reduced
taste ablated used more head on and wake following. hunting success mildly reduced
what’s interesting about research into snakes’ heat sensing abilities
help inform tech for military, search and rescue, police
bees foraging senses research question
is foraging more efficient when multiple senses are used?
(bees tend to use colour + shape along with odour to find flowers)
bee foraging senses methods
trained individual bees to feed on artificial flowers
treatments:
- visual cue
- olfactory cue
- shape and olfactory cue
bee foraging senses results
bees trained to use both visual and odour cues (multimodal) had highest feeding performance
bee foraging senses conclusion
use of multimodal cues facilitates efficient feeding
evolutionary arms race and visual predation:
natural selection favours more cryptic prey, behaviour or morphology that avoids detection.
natural selection favours predators that can better detect hidden/cryptic prey
trout foraging research question
how does cryptic prey colouration affect trout foraging efficiency
trout foraging hypothesis
prey that match their background will be harder for predators to detect, and predator hunting efficiency will increase with experience
trout foraging predictions
- trout will find non cryptic prey faster
- trout will find cryptic prey faster with experience
trout foraging methods
2 aquaria, identical except for bottom: one was brown plastic + grains, other was green plastic + grains.
placed prey in aquarium. it was cryptic on brown, conspicuous on green.
record time until fish found food item
tested half with cryptic half with conspicuous prey
trout foraging results
found non cryptic prey faster
search time decreased with experience
trout foraging conclusion
background colour matching can benefit prey by reducing predator hunting efficiency
predator search
predator search efficiency for cryptic prey increases over time
optimal foraging theory, and 2 common examples
assumes that fitness increases with energy intake rate
behaviour that maximizes fitness is optimal behaviour
diet model
patch use model