Chapter 8 - Board Effectiveness Flashcards

1
Q

What are the main topics covered by FRC Guidance on Board Effectiveness?

A

Follows the layout/setout of UKCGC

  • Board leadership and company purpose
  • Division of responsibilities
  • Composition, succession and evaluation
  • Audit, risk, internal control
  • Remuneration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

According to FRC Guidance on Board Effectiveness, what are the characteristics of an effective board?

A
  • Provides direction for management;
  • Demonstrates ethical leadership, displaying (and promoting throughout the company) behaviour that is consistent with the culture and values it has defined for the organisation;
  • Creates a performance culture that drives value creation without exposing the company to excessive risk of value destruction;
  • Makes well-informed and high-quality decisions based on a clear line of sight into the business;
  • Creates the right framework for helping directors meet their statutory duties under the CA2006, and other relevant statutory and regulatory regimes;
  • Is accountable, particularly to the providers of the company’s capital (shareholders); and
  • Thinks carefully about its governance arrangements and embraces evaluation of their effectiveness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does Pearse Trust identify as key qualities that make a successful chair?

A
  • Ability to chair meetings
  • Understanding the business
  • Ability to influence others, without dominating
  • Strong and resilient personality
  • Good comms skills and able to comm overall strategy to external stakeholders.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Provide actions that the Chair can undertake to improve boardroom dynamics

A
  • Create a positive environment
  • Facilitate decision-making
  • Steer to consensus
  • Stimulate debate- encourage all to contribute
  • Promote airing/resolution of disagreements
  • Set an example with respect to conflicts of interest
  • Maintains control but does not dominate
  • Encourage discussion and contribution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How can NEDs contribute to board effectiveness?

A
  • Attend regularly, prepares to be an effective decision-maker
  • Objective - open to other perspectives
  • Does not dominate
  • Recognises collective decisions
  • Fosters constructive challenge
  • Shares information
  • Provides checks and balance
  • Gives access to networks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What should all information be per Code/FRC Guidance?

A

Accurate, timeley, high quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the CoSec’s role in the supply of information?

A
  • Responsible, under direction of chair, for good information flows.
  • Implement processes required to achieve the objective of accurate, timely and high quality information that flows all levels.
  • CoSec is the facilitator, promoter and guardian of high standards.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 4 main stages in the developing a board pack?

A

1) Identify information the board needs

2) Commission board papers

3) Writing board papers

4) Collate and distributing the board pack

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Company Secretary’s role regarding ‘board effectiveness’?

A

Facilitate discussion on future priorities, type and format of info required and coordinating planning

Responsible, under direction of chair, for good information flows - implement processes required to achieve flow of high quality, accurate and timley information at all levels..

Plan schedule - maintain provisional agenda

Coordinate prep of board pack (commission papers, ensure authors/sponsors ok regarding requirements on them, timetable and tracking)

Support those writing/presenting papers - ex. check understandable to a non-specialist

Act as guardian of house-style/format for papers

Ensure submitted on time

Coordinate collation, storage and distribution of board pack

With Chair/other board members - review whether the board papers meet their needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the typica beneficial features of bespoke software packages (electronic board portals)?

A
  • Secure tools to facilitate distribution and use of electronic agenda papers and board packs
  • Archive facilities enabling directors to refer back to papers/minutes for previous meetings (especially beneficial for NEDs)
  • Secure tools enabling directors to annotate & make notes on the agenda papers
  • Tools to enable secure access to additional papers of interest to board members;
  • Voting tools;
  • Tools to facilitate the circulation and approval of minutes
  • Quicker to draft, collate and distribute board packs
  • Easier access/portability of documents
  • Easier navigation of papers during meetings
  • Secure messaging facilities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is corporate culture?

A

A company’s behaviours and the ways in which it conducts its business and espouses its values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why is it important to set a company’s corporate culture?

A

A healthy corporate culture is a valuable asset which can be a source of competitive advantage and vital to the creation and protection of long-term value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are some ways in which a company can monitor culture?

A
  • Site visits by NEDs
  • Hosting town-halls - open meetings
  • Becoming a customer/mystery shopper
  • Talking to external stakeholders
  • Meetings with jr managers without bosses
  • Review/follow up customer complaints
  • Review/follow up on reports/breaches from whistleblowing-process
  • Others as listed in FRC G.B.E para 23
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What Watest Principle is applicable, and what does it recommend, re corporate culture?

A

PRINCIPLE 1

Company’s purpose and values should inform expected behaviours/practices throughout organisation

  • Values should be explained/integrated into the diff functions and operations of the business
  • Board, SHs & mgmt must make & maintain committment to embedding the desired culture throughout organisation
  • Boards should consider how culture can be monitored effectively.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How is corporate culture related to a company’s strategy, values and purpose?

A

FRC G.B.E : ‘An effective board defines the company’s purpose and then sets a strategy to deliver it, underpinned by the values and behaviours that shape its culture and the way it conducts its business.
<br></br>
A company’s values and behaviours (its culture) should therefore be aligned with its purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why, in particular, might pay and performance structures lead to a bad corporate culture?

A

Pay incentives may reward employees for behaviour that is not in the best interests of the company’s clients and customers leading to a breakdown of trust, e.g. the payment protection insurance mis-selling scandal in the UK (ex. PPI)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is business ethics?

A

‘… application of ethical values to business behaviour
<br></br>

Business ethics is relevant both to the conduct of individuals and conduct of the org as a whole. It applies to any aspect of business conduct…beyond the legal requirements…therefore, about discretionary decisions and behaviour guided by values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the stages for developing a Code of Ethics?

A

1) CoSec asked to develop
2) When drafted, consults with employees and share feedback with the board
3) Board approve
4) Pilot for around 6 months (CoSec with HR and IT)
5) CoSec and HR collect input and feedback during pilot and feed back to board - with suggested amendments to ensure employee buy-in
6) CoSec/HR to roll out the code- posters, workshops and information on company intranet
7) Once operational - CoSec and IA monitor compliance (breaches raised under whistleblowing procedure - via Audit Committee)
8) CoSec recommend any ammendments based on result of stage.7 and due to changes in societal norms
9) When revised code approved - HR/CoSec to communicate to employees
<br></br>

Changes should only be made where absolutely necessary - too many/too frequent may confuse employees

19
Q

How can a company go about setting its ethical values/corporate culture?

A
  • Agree and develop ethical values - consider how purpose and strategy aligned
  • Develop/adopt a company Code of Conduct/Ethics - setting out values and behavioural expectations
  • Ensure values and a code are communicated to the board, management and employees and taken into account when developing operational policies and procedures - ensure message is clear to senior management
  • Publicise / implement training to ensure values & code embedded within org values & behaviours
  • Ensure values integrated into all functions/operations of the company
  • Ensure organisation performance management/rewards incentivise behaviour in line with the values and the code
  • Ensure culture of openness and accountability (open environment) where employees feel they can raise unethical practices
  • Ensure code of ethics reviewed from time to time taking into account changes in societal norms.
    -Set tone from the top - transparency and integrity of the board and senior management
20
Q

What does a standard / general Code of Ethics typically contain?

A
  • Company values
  • Company ethical principles
  • Company ethical values (stakeholder groups)
  • Implementation (statement of responsibility re compliance, means to obtain advice and any applicable training required/available)
21
Q

What can the company do to measure that its Code of Ethics is effective?

A
  • Staff surveys
  • Report of customer complaints
  • Reports/feedback re whistle-blowing procedure/pollicy and how effectively issues addressed via whilstleblowing helpine.
  • Have this as a topic when engaging other stakeholders such as customers
  • Having the Code of Ethics as a standing item for Board meetings
22
Q

Provide ways in which the company secretary can assist the board in maintaining an ethical culture

A

BOARD
- Suggesting that discussions about corporate culture are (standing items) on the board’s agenda
- Organising site visits so that members of the board can get out and about and meet employees to assess for themselves the culture embedded within the organisation
<br></br>

STAKEHOLDERS
- Suggesting culture indicators selected based on the expectations of the org’s stakeholders;
- Assisting in developing the reporting to stakeholders on the organisation’s culture
<br></br>

INDICATORS & INFORMATION
- Developing a dashboard for the culture indicators that should be reviewed from time to time by the board
- Ensure information drawn from wide range of sources (to support/monitor perception of performance for selected indicators)

Assist establishing an ethics management management programme aligning with organisation’s mission, vision and values.

23
Q

What is the difference between ethical principles & ethical values?

A
  • Ethical principlesguidance and direction for behaviour, relate to issues such as fairness, equality and justice etc, are universal and set boundaries to be respected

<br></br>
- Ethical values – shape context in which ethical principles are implemented, guide the board and management’s choices, frame the organisation’s behaviour norms and incorporate into the organisational culture.

24
Q

How might the company secretary be involved in the procedures to enable the directors to obtain independent professional advice?

A
  • CoSec should propose board adopts a procedure
  • This could be done by way of a board resolution or as part of a board procedures manual.
  • If procedure sets certain conditions or imposes any financial limits, some sort of pre-approval mechanism will be required.
  • The secretary could be the person whose approval is required.
  • However, this could compromise the secretary’s impartiality, particularly if the conditions require difficult judgement calls to be made.
  • In these circumstances, it makes more sense for the chair or the senior independent director to be the person who makes the decision.
  • Even if the secretary is not personally involved in the approval process, it may be sensible for the initial application by a director to be made through the secretary, who then forwards it on to the appropriate person for approval.
  • Someone will need to record the fact that an application has been made and whether the necessary approval has been given (or refused).
  • This information will also need to be reported to the board, particularly where approval has been given and advice has been obtained.
  • Somebody also needs to authorise the payment of any invoices to the independent advisers. These task will typically fall to the CoSec.
25
Q

What does ICSA’s Model Board resolution on independent professional advice set out?

A
  • Directors given right to consult prof advisers of company and, if necessary, seek indepedent advice at company’s expense
  • Only where furthering exercise of their duties as directors of the company
  • Must give prior notice of intent to seek - who / brief summary of subject matter
  • CoSec to provide written acknowledgement of receipt - whether fees payable by company or not
  • Director must obtain prior approval - where fees expected to exceed stated amount
  • Any advice obtained must be made available to the board if it so requests
26
Q

Generally, under the Code - what should the annual performance evaluation cover?

A

Princ L:
* Board composition, diversity,how effectively members work together to achieve objectives
* Indiv: whether each individual director (still) contributes effectively.<br></br>

Prov.21
* Should extend not only to performance of boards and directors but also board committess and the chair.

27
Q

What does the FRC Guidance on Board effectiveness suggest regarding the selection of an external evaluator?

A
  • Different providers apply different methods - costs vary greatly depending on this
  • Nature/extent of external evaluator’s contact usually be defining factors in quality
  • ex. questionnaire-based evaluations unlikely to ‘reach dynamic’ of the boardroom)
  • Should be mindful of existing commercial relationships/potential conflicts of interest - select one that can provide independent judgement
  • Agree objectives/scope, expected quality, value/longevity of service & communicate to board
  • Ensure full cooperation with evaluator - full access to papers/info- observation of meetings/meet with directors individually
  • Ensure evaluation not approached as merely a compliance exercise
28
Q

What are some further aspects that can be included in an evaluation as per FRC Guidance on Board Effectiveness?

A
  • Mix of skills, experience and knowledge in context of company’s challenges
  • Clarity of/leadership given to - purpose, direction and values of the company
  • Succession and development plans
  • How board works as unit - tone set by chair and CEO
  • Key board relationships
  • Effectiveness of individual directors
  • Clarity of SID role
  • Effectiveness of board committees & how they are connected with the main board
  • Quality of information, papers and presentations, discussions around individual proposals
  • Process chair uses to ensure sufficient debate re major/contentious issues
  • Effectiveness of CoSec/secretariat
  • Clarity of decision-making process
  • Process(es) for identifying and reviewing risks
  • How board communicates with / listens & responds to shareholders and other stakeholders
29
Q

When are evaluations most valuable, as per FRC Guidance on Board Effectiveness?

A
  • Recommendations are constructive, meaningful, forward-looking
  • Clear set of recommendations and actions - time period for review of progress against agreed outcomes
  • Includes views beyond boardroom
  • Includes peer reviews of directors/chair and feedback on each director
  • Good practice in other companies shared
  • Interaction between directors and between CEO and chair observed by evaluation
  • Robust analysis of information provided to board
  • Feedback to each individual board member provided
  • Board challenged on: composition, diversity, skills gaps, refreshment & succession
30
Q

How can the Company Secretary (CoSec) assist in the annual evaluation process?

A
  • Help chair select external facilitator
  • Where internal - possibly will be involved in designing and performing the evaluation
  • Either way, will usually involved in analysis of evaluation results and framing any recommendations presented
  • Once any recommendations have been proposed to the board, Company Sec will produce a matrix of recommendations/actions taken to ensure monitoring is undertaken
31
Q

What information should be disclosed in AR & accounts regarding the annual performance evaluation?

A

PROV.23 - Annual Report should describe the work of the nomination committee including:

  • How board evaluation conducted
  • Nature and extent of external facilitators’ contact with board/individual directors
  • Outcomes/actions taken
  • How evaluation has or will influence board composition <br></br>

A company that does not comply will need to include an explanation in CG report.

32
Q

Under UKCGC - how often should a company have an externally facilitated board evaluation?

A

PROV.21
* Since 2021- FTSE 350 companies must have an externally-facilitated board evaluation at least every three years.
* Code requires that chairs of other companies to annually consider having a externally facilitated board evaluation now or at some point in the future.

33
Q

As per FRC Guidance, what four characteristics should any board evaluation have (internal or external)?

A
  • Objective and rigorous process
  • Bespoke in formulation and delivery
  • Chair has overall responsibility and should select appropriate approach, involving the SID if required
  • NEDs, led by SID, should be responsible for performance evaluation of the chairman, taking into account the views of executive directors. <br></br>
    In certain circumstances the SID may lead the whole evaluation process, for example where the CEO is acting as the company Chair.
34
Q

What might the induction of a new director consist of?

A

FRC G.B.E
* Chair should ensure all new directors recieve a full, formal and tailored induction on joining the board.
* CoSec under direction of chair should facilitate induction, arrange training and assist with professional development as required.<br></br>

para 107 - induction should be bespoke in its formluation and delivery
para. 110 - information gained from board evaluation can be fed back into induction (and other processes)
<br></br>
May include:
- Site visits
- Product presentations
- Meetings with senior management and staff
- Meetings withe external advisers
- Meetings with major shareholders, if they , UKCGC states as part of the induction process, directors should be offered the opportunity to meet with the company’s major shareholders.

35
Q

What should the aims of an induction process be?

A

Induction programmes should ultimately seek to enhance the effectiveness of new directors.

According to the ICSA Guidance on Induction of Directors, they should aim to:

  • Build an understanding of the nature of the company, its business and the markets in which it operates
  • Build a link with the company’s people
  • Build an understanding of the company’s main relationships
  • Ensure an understanding of the role of a director and the framework within which the board operates.
36
Q

How might a company benefit from having its executive directors serve as NEDs on other boards?

A

Some see serving as an NED as an essential part of executive director professional development<br></br>
- By becoming NED at a non-competitor - 1st hand experience of the exec/non-exec divide
- Should aid understanding of NED concerns/make executive directors more likely to cater for NEDs
- Gain experience of how other boards operate
- Be able to compare different practices and recommend the adoption of those that appear to be better
- Experience first-hand what it is like to be a NED and what NEDs expect and require in order to perform effectively.
- Danger that executives will simply moderate their behaviour to what they expect of an NED - thus will not offer suitably robust challenge

37
Q

Name some factors that can limit effective decision-making?

A
  • Poor quality papers
  • Dominant personality(ies) - ineffective challenge
  • Lack of time for debate
  • Undue focus on short-time horizons
  • Lack of openness by management, including reluctance to involve NEDs (board ‘rubber stamps’ rather than discuss)
  • Insufficient diversity- GROUPTHINK
  • Conflicts of interest
  • Emotional attachments
  • Compliance mindset: failure to treat risk as part of the decision-making process
  • Failure to listen to/act on concerns raise (anywhere)
  • Inappropriate reliance on previous experience & decisions (insufficient knowledge/unable to test underlying assumptions)
38
Q

Give 5 characteristics of ‘‘painful meetings’’ and 5 characteristics of ‘‘successful meetings”

A

PAINFUL
- Chair is insensitive
- No agenda
- Lack of focus, forays into side issues
- Rigid adherance to agenda and/or timetable
- Long monologues

SUCCESSFUL
- Connections are made
- Issues and tasks are clearly defined
- Productive problem-solving climate
- Flexible agenda
- Energy is generated

39
Q

CoSec role in board meeting

A
  • attendance
  • quorum
  • record
  • advise on governance matters (all)
  • advise on procedural matters (chair)
40
Q

What does the Code/FRC Guidance state regarding director professional development ?

A
  • Frequent update of skills etc
  • CoSec to facilitate/organise under direction of the Chair
  • Training needs are likely to show/good to look at when analysing results of the board evaluation process<br></br>
  • Prov.22 - chair should act on results of evaluation/directors should engage with the process and take appropriate action to any ideas highlighted for development
    FRC G.B.E - NEDs should devote timecontinue to make positive contribution and generate respect of the other directors
  • NEDs need to understand main area’s of the company’s business as well as its organisational culture
41
Q

What common actions will the company secretary take regarding induction, training and professional development?

A
  • Organise adhoc sessions - where important issues for update/training prior to board meetings
  • Use of away-days - adhoc and opportunity for shorter training sessions
  • Make presentations / invite external advisers/experts to deliver sessions
  • More intense in-house/external courses where required
  • Consider online/webinars/podcasts as potential training opportunities
42
Q

What should the company secretary do during the induction of a new appointee?

A
  • Consult with them prior to beginning the induction programme
  • Prioritise/schedule matters over reasonable period so as not to overwhelm the new director
  • Vary delivery
  • Organising site visits/meetings
  • Plan induction with reference to training/development programme - one should transition smoothly into the other
  • Review with the director mid-way and at end of the process
43
Q

What are the differences between business ethics, corporate reponsibility and sustainability?

A
  • Business ethics - integrating company’s ethical values into business behaviours and functions. Essentially, the organisation doing ‘the right thing’.
  • CR = doing good deeds, having a positive effect on communities and environment and lessening negative impacts
  • Sustainability = the long term.