Chapter 7 Semantic Memory Flashcards

1
Q

Tulving

A

Brain damage affects semantic memory less than episodic
Retrograde amnesia leaves semantic memories intact except knowledge acquired shortly before onset of amnesia
Semantic dementia associated with damage to anterior frontal temporal lobes
Amnesia usually medial temporal lobe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Burianova

A

Same neural network active during episodic, semantic, autobio retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Kan

A

Task involving only episodic memory also involved semantic memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Organization of concepts

A

Giving category first and initial letter after faster than reverse
Easier to activate category in preparation
Novice psychology students had no diff between category of psychologist or guessing name first - older fast when category first

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hierarchical network model

Collins

A

Waste of space to have info about being able to fly stored w every bird name
Canary, yellow stored at same level of hierarchy
“A canary can fly” should take longer because the concept and property are separated by one level in hierarchy
Depends on familiarity - when familiarity controlled, distance between subject and property had little effect on time
Verification times faster for more typical members of category - typicality effect
Categories loosely determined - Collins wrong - and fuzzy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Verheyen

2 reasons why individual differences decide which items belong to category

A

Ambiguity - different criteria for categorization

Vagueness - individuals may use different cut-offs to separate members from non - how strenuous must sport be?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Spreading activation model
Collins again
To deal with inflexibility of hierarchical model

A

Length of links between 2 concepts indicates degree of semantic relatedness between them
Red closer to orange than sunsets
Red links faster with roses than flowers
More specificity = faster
When doctor connected with nurse, hospital then not presented on recog test, doctor should be highly activated because of closeness
Brain activation similar when subjects falsely recognized missing word and when correctly recognized it on list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dell’s speech production theory

A

Uses spreading activation

Speech errors occur when incorrect word is more activated than correct one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Problems with spreading activation

A

No concept is represented by single node
Model implies each concept has single, fixed representation:
Fred greatly enjoyed playing the piano
Fred found it difficult to lift the piano

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rosch

3 levels

A

Superordinate categories (furniture)
Basic (chair)
Subordinate (easy chair)
We usually use basic because it balances informativeness and distinctiveness (lacking at either level)
Experts use sub
Faces use sub
Superordinate levels are faster - less info processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Concepts

A

Abstract in nature, detached from sensory and motor processes
Stable
Similar between people
Barsalou argued for bicycle aspects activated by goals
Can involve perception - lawn focuses on external properties, sod focuses on internal (dirt, soil)
Half watermelon: pips, red
Influenced by context
Barsalou exaggerates extent concept processing varies across situations, and there are several possible interpretations of the finding that concept processing typically involves perceptual and/or motor features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hub and spoke model

Patterson

A

Spokes are modality-specific brain areas in which sensory and motor processing occur
Spokes: visual features, verbal descriptors, olfaction, sounds, motor, soma
Each concept has a hub
Each hub in anterior temporal lobes
Dementia lose hubs
Activated temp lobe areas in semantic tasks far away from perceptual and motor processing areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mayberry
Frontal lobes and semantic dementia
Hub and spokes

A

Category task to dementia patients
Dementia causes blurring of boundary separating members of category from nonmembers
Would cause prediction probs for atypical members and noncategory members resembling members (butterfly/bird)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Spokes of hub and spokes

A

Common type of deficit involves greater difficulty id pictures of living than nonliving things
Living things have greater overlap
Cree: 7 patterns of deficits follow brain damage: most impaired colour, taste, smell, visual motion, function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hub and spoke

TMS

A

Pobric
With TMS, ant temp lobe or inferior parietal lobe inhibited naming living things, manipulable objects, nonmanipulable man-made things
On ant temp lobe, increased time for all three categories
On inferior parietal, should increase time only for manipulable objects and not nonmanipulable or living things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Schemas

A

Script - knowledge about events and consequences
Frames - knowledge structures (building)
semantic dementia have more trouble with concepts (functions) than schemas/scripts
Damage to PfC/temporal lobes have script problems - ordering actions within script, deciding which actions of most importance, worse performance on judging between and even order within clusters than dementia

17
Q

Schemas

A

Allow us to form expectations and take action when they are disconfirmed - menu/waitress
Prevent cognitive overload - stereotypes

18
Q

Bartlett
War of the ghosts
Schemas

A

Rationalization - recall errors based on schematic knowledge and cultural expectations - flawed - corrected by Gauld
Objects not in grad office but recognized were schema-consistent. Participants recall more schema-consistent than non
False recall rate lower for objects having high schema-relevance than low. Guesses more likely to be correct
Recall better for very inconsistent objects (octopus on farm) than somewhat inconsistent - info distinctive in given context attracts attn and is remembered
Schemas can be guessed in life based on present objects
Memory reps are often richer and more complex than implied by schema theories
Theories de-emphasize importance of individual diffs - readers draw inferences automatically
Vague