Chapter 7 Sac Study Flashcards

1
Q

Why should criminal and civil cases be timely in their resolution? (timely resolution of disputes TEE) 3

A
  • civil cases so compensation can be paid and stress caused by taking matter to court/tribunal can be short.
  • Criminal cases to reduce costs & distress of not knowing outcomes
  • should be sufficient time spent preparing cases and all evidence considered so should be resolved in REASONABLE time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is entitlement to a fair and unbiased hearing? (best to talk about for adversary system)

A
  • Legal system provides procedures that facilitate a fair hearing or trial, free from bias
  • The court processes (including rules of e&p and jury system) should operate to not disadvantage either party, ensuring equality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is effective access to the legal system? (2)

A
  • all people have right to, and should have equal access to take matter to court, tribunal or dispute resolution body
  • gov also can provide assistance to people who can’t afford access to legal system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the major features of the adversary system of trial? (4)

A

2 roles - role of the judge, role of the parties
2 needs - strict rules of e&p need for legal representation
1 - standard and burden of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the role of the parties in the adversary system? (2)

A
  • each party is responsible for preparing and presenting their own cases
  • They determine how/what evidence is presented
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the role of the judge in the adversary system? (3)

A
  • to act as an independent, impartial adjudicator and not favour either side
  • ensure each party is treated equally and fairly
  • responsible for the rules of e&p being adhered to
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are 4 types of evidence?

A
  • oral evidence (main emphasis)
  • expert evidence
  • audio or audiovisual
  • circumstantial evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are 3 types of inadmissible evidence?

A
  • hearsay evidence: unreliable bc witness didn’t actually see or hear what occurred
  • irrelevant evidence: does not help establish important facts of case
  • evidence obtained illegally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the strict rules of evidence and procedure in the Adversary system? (3)

A
  • strong emphasis on oral testimony
  • All evidence must be relevant and admissible
  • Rules of evidence aimed at encouraging fair and unbiased hearing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the difference between evidence and procedure?

A

evidence concerned with proving the facts whereas rules of procedure establish the steps for bringing out the evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the need for legal representation in the adversary system? (2)

A
  • for adversary system to work effectively there should be equal rep
  • both parties should have equal opportunity to present cases, usually via legal representation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is 1 strength of the role of the parties in the adversary system?

A

parties responsible for preparation and presentation of their case - each party can present best possible evidence and argument to support it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are 3 weaknesses of the role of the parties in the adversary system?

A
  • high cost of legal rep
  • vital evidence being missed and truth not disclosed
  • actions of either party may result in delays in preparation in case, leading to higher cost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are 2 strengths of the role of the judge in the adversary system?

A
  • judge remains impartial - ensuring no bias

- judge is independent of the prosecuting authority - guaranteeing fair treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are 2 weaknesses of the role of the judge in the adversary system?

A
  • expertise of the judge may not be fully utilised

- the judge cannot offer assistance to unrepresented party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is 1 strength and 1 weakness of the burden and standard of proof in the adversary system?

A

S - party brining the case has to prove the facts to the standard of proof required, every individual treated equal until an allegation is proven

W - the adversary system is more concerned with winning rather than finding out the truth (each party brining out the facts to benefit their side)

17
Q

what is one strength and one weakness of legal rep in the adversary system?

A

S - each party has right to be legally represented which helps maintain fairness

W - any unrepresented party will be engaged in a less-than-equal contest or a less skilled legal rep can be a disadvantage

18
Q

What are 3 strengths of rules of e&p in the adversary system?

A
  • oral evidence helps reveal if the witness is sincere which will help provide a fair outcome
  • examination in chief & cross examination enables evidence to be tested for truth
  • rules of procedure mean that each party is treated in a consistent and fair manner
19
Q

what are 3 weaknesses of rules of e&p in the adversary system?

A
  • witnesses may be intimidated and say something misleading
  • witnesses can only respond to questions, can’t tell story in own words (can’t tell whole story)
  • expert evidence could be unduly relied on
20
Q

What are 4 possible reforms to the adversary system of trial?

A
  • greater investigating role for the judge or magistrate
  • greater use of written statements, rather than oral evid.
  • relaxation of rules of evidence (such as allowing hearsay evidence)
  • greater availability of legal aid
21
Q

What are 2 processes that contribute to the achieving of a timely resolution of disputes?

A

The legal system helps to:

  • Provide systems such as mediation in civil cases to speed up the process
  • cut out the committal hearings in a clear-cut case
22
Q

What are 2 problems that exist in relation to timely resolution of disputes?

A
  • some parties in a civil case may not meet deadlines for pre-trial procedures
  • pre-trial procedures in a civil case are long and time consuming
23
Q

what is one recent change and how has it assisted in achieving a timely resolution of disputes?

A

Amendments in 2010 to the Criminal Procedure Act - introduced changes to simplify criminal procedure :e.g. one court will hear all related charges for incident together, whether summary or indictable. This saves time by reducing need to hear 2 separate committal proceedings

24
Q

What is one recommendation for change and how will this be beneficial in timely resolution of disputes?

A
  • greater use of written statements from witnesses - would save time because cross-examination is very time consuming and can be confusing
25
What are 2 processes that contribute to a fair and unbiased hearing? (BEST LINK TO ADVERSARY)
party brining the case has to prove the facts to the standard of proof required, every individual treated equal until an allegation is proven legal aid - provided to some parties unable to afford legal rep, although the availability of legal aid is limited
26
what are 2 processes that hinder a fair and unbiased hearing?
- vital evidence may be inadmissible | - judge can't assist unrepresented parties
27
what is one recent change and how has it assisted in achieving a fair and unbiased hearing?
Evidence Act - made amendments to the rules of evidence and their admissibility. While there is a strict approach to admissibility in criminal, it is more flexible in civil
28
what is one recommendation for change in relation to a fair and unbiased hearing?
making it easier for witnesses to tell their story - instead of being questioned, which will make truth more likely to be found
29
what are 2 processes that contribute to effective access to the legal system?
parties: - have access to legal rep - have opportunity to take a matter to court
30
what are 2 processes that hinder with effective access to the legal system?
- need for legal rep may lead to some parties not pursing their civil claim due to cost - a person who reps themselves is disadvantaged
31
what is 1 recent change and how has it assisted in achieving effective access to the legal system?
Amendments in 2010 to the Criminal Procedure Act - simplified criminal procedure by making criminal procedure laws clear and accessible. a number of acts where put into this one act to simplify these procedure laws
32
what is one recommendation for change in achieving effective access to the legal system?
increased legal aid - lack of funds is barrier to justice. An increase in availability of legal aid could assist parties to defend a case or bring a civil case to court
33
What is the difference between the role of the judge in adversary and inquisitorial?
adversary: - case conducted before independent and impartial adjudicator inquisitorial: - judge takes active role in investigating the case - judge conducts questioning of witnesses - judge gathers evidence w/ police
34
what is the difference in the rules of evidence and procedure?
adversary: - all evidence collected by parties - strict rules of e&p followed - mainly relies on oral evidence inquisitorial: - all evidence collected by judge - no strict rules of e&p - relies heavily on written statements
35
what is the difference in legal rep between adversary and inquisitorial?
adversary: - reps parties interests - prepare and presents parties case - examination of witnesses Inquisitorial: - greatly reduced role - may ask questions after judge has completed their questioning
36
what is the difference in the role of the parties in inquisitorial and adversary?
adversary: - parties responsible for preparation and presentation of their case Inquisitorial: - parties respond to directions of court in presenting arguments to the court
37
What are 3 ways the inquisitorial procedures are used in Australia?
Coroners Court: - Coroner takes active role in investigating accident Family Court: - having judge take far more active role in conduct of the case VCAT: - less reliance on legal rep, less adherence to rules of e&p