Chapter 7 - Contract and Business Law - Concepts Flashcards
The right to enter into contract is basic to the (1) system, though over time contracts have become regulated by (2) and (3). The ALI’s (4) attempts to make consistent terminology used in contracts.
- free enterprise
- legislatures
- courts
- Restatement (Second) of Contracts
A (1) states a party cannoy introduce oral evidence to contradict the terms of a (2) that is complete. This does not apply to (3), (4), (5) or (6) and sometimes oral agreements will be used to clear up (7).
- parol evidence rule 2. fraud 3. duress 4. misrepresentation 6. amendments (change orders, eg) 7. ambiguities
2 basic types of contracts
- express
2. implied (buying a hamburger)
Lecture: 3 building blocks of contract law
- offer 2. acceptance 3. consideration
A contract in which parties exchange promises is a (1); one in which one party responds to another’s offer by performing an act is a (2). An (3) is one that has yet to be performed; an (4) is one where the performance has been completed.
- bilateral
- unilateral
- executory contract
- executed contract
An (1) a contract occurs when one one party to a contract assigns rights to another who is not a party to the original contract. Usually allowed as long as the (2) or a (3) does not say otherwise; a (4) may still approve the assignment in these cases.
- assignment 2. contract 3. statute 4. courts
Difference between a voidable contract and a void contract
The voidable contract is one that may be legitimately cancelled; a void contract is one not recognized by law (such as a contract to kill someone)
Although (1) can be assigned, (2) of same person may not be delegated. The non-assigning party retains all (3) and (4) under the contract.
- rights 2. duties 3. rights 4. defenses
A contract utilizing a (1) such as a check or promissory note would require precise terms and thus be a (2); other contracts are (2).
- negotiable instrument
- formal contract
- informal contracts
The three basic components of a contract are the (1), (2) and (3). there must be (4) of two or more parties who have the (5).
- offer
- acceptance
- consideration (exchange of benefits/promise/forbearance)
- mutual assent
- capacity to contract (age of legal majority, competent)
In contract law, the (1) must manifest an (2), while the (3) must accept the offer on the (4).
- offeror
- intention to become legally bound
- offeree
- terms proposed
Lucy v. Zehmer,in which a person sold a 471-acre farm for $50,000, was a case in which the SC used a (1) standard to determine that a contract was valid even though the offeror claimed it was a (2).
- reasonableness
2. joke
An ad that is definite as to (1), (2) and (3) can be seen as an intention to be bound and upholdable as a contract; in most cases ads would not be seen as valid (4) so lack of stock could not be sued for.
- time
- place
- description of goods
- legal offer
Where there is not definite information in a contract, (1) applies. For example, acceptance of an oral offer must be made (2). (3) may also play in. Conditional acceptance of terms are seen by law as a (4) and thus a (5) of the original terms.
- reasonableness
- by the end of the conversation
- Customs of an industry
- counter-offer
- rejection
The precursors of the “consideration” standard of seriousness in a contract were (1) and (2). In common law consideration was a (3) or a (4).
- oaths
- seals
- benefit to a promisor
- detriment to a promisee
4 things consideration in exchange for a promise can be
- an act other than a promise (labor in return for a promise to pay)
- a forbearance (agree not to build annex to house in exchange for right to use neighbor’s well)
- the creation, modification or destruction of a legal relation (withdrawal from a partnership so daughter can be partner)
- a return promise (deed for money)
A promise in a contract cannot be (1)–that is, it must commit to do something definite, instead of saying, “I will pay you when I have money). Courts generally do not become involved in the (2) of American contracts, provided no (3) is involved. However, agreeing to accept a lesser amount than the debt creates an agreement called an (4) that extinguishes the debt.
- illusory
- adequacy of consideration
- fraud
- accord and satisfaction
A (1), or act previously committed, cannot be grounds for a contract. (2) also cannot be considered–for example, payment cannot be offered to police to respond to a crime. The requirement of consideration may be dropped in cases of (3), such as if one party incurs expenses based on promises of other party. This includes promises of funds to (4) who relied on that promise.
- past consideration
- pre-existing duty
- promissory estoppel
- charities
A (1) does not have legal capacity to enter into contracts and thus may (2) a contract. This is seen in purchasing (3) such as cars and in (4). Persons under (5) for any reason are legally incapable of contracting, as are (6) people.
- minor
- disaffirm
- unnecessary
- marriage contracts
- legal guardianship
- intoxicated
Law does not enforce contracts to do (1). This is often extended to lenders’ (2).
- criminal acts
2 usurious rates of interest
In a (1), either party can avoid a contract; however, a (2) is no grounds for avoidance. (3), however, is grounds for avoidance. A contract can also be avoided for (4)–if inequality of acceptance is so strong as to shock the conscience. The (5) supports this last one.
- mutual mistake (both parties are mistaken)
- unilateral mistake (one party makes a mistake)
- material misrepresentation of fact (tampered odometer)
- unconscionability
- Uniform Commercial Code
The meaning of (1) is somewhat vague. The old standard is that in the absence of constitutional or statutory provisions, it can be found in (2) and the (3). Public policy plays a part in how contracts are enforced, especially in (4).
- public policy
- decisions of courts
- practice of government officials
- covenants not to compete
5 types of contracts which statutes of frauds require to be in writing
- sale of real estate or lease for more than a year
- marriage
- anything that cannot be performed within a year
- payment of a debt (such as suretyship)
- sale of personal property over $500
2 exceptions to the requirement that specified types of contracts be in formal writing
- informal memos that describe parties, subject matter and essential terms of contract (for real estate, also a description of property)
- knowingly allowing someone to do work that has not been ordered
Duties may be (1); however, the (2) remains liable. The (3) must be able to perform as effectively as the (4). Construction, delivery, etc.can be delegated; (5) are non-delegable.
- delegated 2. contracting party 3. delegatee 4. delegator 5. professional services (doctor, lawyer)
Normally (1) have the right to enforce the contract, but most contracts can be (2). The right to enforce a contract also extends to (3) and (4).
- parties to a contract
- assigned (so assignee can enforce)
- third-party donee beneficiary (recipient of life insurance)
- third-party creditor beneficiary (such as someone who should be paid back by contract between other people…a transferred loan)
Fulfillment of a contract constitutes (1); excused lack of fulfillment is (2), (3) or delays due to strike, adverse weather conditions or (4). Clauses accounting for these possibilities are sometimes referred to as (5).
- performance
- impossibility of performance
- illegal obligations in contract
- acts of God
- force majeure clauses
Fulfillment of a contract constitutes (1); excused lack of fulfillment is (2), (3) or delays due to strike, adverse weather conditions or (4). Clauses accounting for these possibilities are sometimes referred to as (5).
- performance
- impossibility of performance
- illegal obligations in contract
- acts of God
- force majeure clauses
Non-performance of a contract is (1); denial of the contract before the time for performance is (2). The three judicial remedies for breach are (3), (4) and (5).
- breach of contract
- anticipatory breach
- damages
- specific performance
- rescission of the contract
Damages in contract cases are usually assessed by a (1) and are usually (2) for the plaintiff to recover what he would have gained had the contract been executed. Damages have to be proven to have been (3).
- jury
- compensatory
- reasonably foreseeable
Three other types of damages, besides compensatory, that may be awarded.
- nominal (breach did occur but no damages)
- liquidated (specified in contract how damages are calculated, such as how much per day if a construction project is late)
- punitive (when related to torts only!)