Chapter 7 - Board composition and succession planning Flashcards
If a board is comprised of a chair, three executive directors, one of whom is the CEO, and a non-executive director representing the major shareholder, how many independent directors will be required to comply with the UK Corporate Governance Code?
Under the Code, at least half the board (excluding the chair) must be independent NEDs. Accordingly, the minimum number of independent NEDs required must balance out the three executive directors and the NED who is not independent. This means that there must be at least four independent NEDs.
List the factors that will typically influence the size of the board.
The main factors that will typically influence the size of the board are:
- the requirements for a balanced board;
- the requirements of the UK Code on the composition of the board;
- the need to service board committees; and
- the ability of the board to hold productive, constructive discussions and make prompt rational decisions.
What is a skills matrix?
A skills matrix is a table that displays people’s proficiency in specified skills, knowledge, competencies and aptitudes.
What purpose would such a matrix serve in the process of appointing a new director?
A skills matrix can be used:
- to assess whether there are any areas in which the skills and aptitudes of the board as a whole may be lacking, or
may become lacking as a result of the departure of one or more directors; - to assess whether the board is over-reliant on the skills or aptitudes of certain individuals in any particular area;
- to map the existing skillset against that required to execute strategy and meet future challenges; and
- to draw up a profile of the ideal candidate for any board vacancies
How does the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code seek to promote diversity?
Code Principle J provides that both appointments and succession plans should be based on merit and objective criteria and, within this context, should promote diversity of gender, social and ethnic backgrounds, cognitive and personal strengths. In addition, Code Principle L states that the annual board evaluation should consider diversity.
However, the main tool used to promote diversity is to require disclosure in the report of the nomination committee on diversity issues.
These disclosure requirements effectively mean that the board must adopt a diversity and inclusion policy for board and senior executive appointments, which could include diversity targets, and succession policies that promote diversity.
These policies could be part of an overall diversity and inclusion policy that covers the workforce as a whole or in addition to it
List the types of disclosures listed companies are required to make on diversity.
Listed companies are required under the Code to make the following disclosures in the report of the nomination
committee:
- the process used in relation to appointments, its approach to succession planning and how both support developing a diverse pipeline;
- how the board evaluation has or will influence board composition;
- the policy on diversity and inclusion, its objectives and linkage to company strategy, how it has been implemented and progress on achieving the objectives (this requirement is also mirrored by DTR 7.2.8A); and
- the gender balance of those in the senior management and their direct reports
CA2006, s. 414C also requires quoted companies to include in their strategic report a breakdown showing at the end of the financial year the number of persons of each sex who were:
- directors;
- senior managers; and
- employees of the company
What are the three main roles of the nomination committee?
The three main roles of the nomination committee
are to:
- lead the process for appointments;
- ensure plans are in place for orderly succession to both the board and senior management positions; and
- oversee the development of a diverse pipeline for succession.
What are the membership requirements for the committee?
The Code provides that a majority of members of the nomination committee should be independent non-executive
directors. This provision is effectively designed to enable the company chair to serve on the committee, even if not
considered independent.
Outline the process for appointing a new NED.
The nomination committee should evaluate the skills, experience and knowledge on the board, the future challenges affecting the business, and, in the light of this evaluation, prepare a description of the role and capabilities required for a particular appointment.
It should then agree the process to be undertaken to identify, sift and interview suitable candidates, ensuring that a proper assessment of values and expected behaviours is built into the recruitment process. This will typically involve engaging recruitment consultants.
The nomination committee will interview a selection of candidates put forward by the recruitment consultants and use these interviews to narrow down the list of candidates or ask for further candidates to be proposed.
In the final stages of the process, the nomination committee may invite the final candidate(s) to meet other members of the board.
After taking soundings from other board members, the committee will make its final recommendation to the board, which will then make the final decision.
As the Code requires all directors to be re-elected annually, the shareholders will have the opportunity to confirm or reject
the appointment at the next AGM.
How might that process differ when seeking to appoint a new chair or chief executive?
The appointment of a new chair or CEO may involve the consideration of internal candidates.
An existing independent NED could be elected as the chair and an existing senior executive could be promoted to become CEO. In contrast, the appointment of a NED will always involve recruiting external candidates if they are to be considered independent.
Briefly outline the three time horizons that a succession plan should cover.
Succession plans should consider the following different time horizons:
- contingency planning – for sudden and unforeseen departures;
- medium-term planning – the orderly replacement of current board members and senior executives (e.g. retirement); and
- long-term planning – the relationship between the delivery of the company strategy and objectives to the skills
needed on the board now and in the future.
Why is it more difficult to prepare a succession plan for executive directors?
There is no minimum term of office for executive directors. If the company is successful, the CEO may seek to avoid any discussion surrounding their eventual departure. If the company is not successful there may be sudden, forced departures.
Senior executives may also be poached by other companies, leaving a sudden vacancy
Give three legitimate reasons why the nomination committee might propose a refreshment of the board
Refreshment could be used:
- to replace a non-executive who is not making an effective contribution;
- to meet diversity targets; or
- to bring in a new director who has certain critical skills.
Why does the Code 18 require all directors to offer themselves for re-election on an annual basis?
According to the FRC, the annual re-election requirement was introduced to give shareholders an annual opportunity to express their views on the performance of the directors and to give boards an incentive to listen and respond to their concerns.
The FRC hoped that this would in turn lead to ongoing engagement. Legally, annual re-elections mean that shareholders seeking the removal of a director do not need to propose their own resolution, which would involve giving special notice.
What will a balanced board consist of
A balanced board will include:
- Separate roles of chair and CEO - Provision 9
- An appropriate balance of executive, non-executive and independent directors - Provision G and provision 11
- Appropriate skills, experience and knowledge - Principle K
- Gender balance - Principle J
- Diversity - Principle J