Chapter 69 Approach to the Management of Cancer Pain Flashcards
KEY POINTS 1. Successful treatment of cancer pain is possible most of the time. 2. The cancer pain syndrome should be determined: nociceptive, neuropathic, or mixed. 3. Cancer pain should be assessed and managed within the dimensions of suffering that a patient and his or her family experience: physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. 4. Daily evaluation includes an assessment of the location, type, temporal profile, and severity of each significant pain. 5. The World Health Organiza
Effective pain management must begin with
comprehensive pain assessment.
the gold standard for assessing pain is
the patient’s self-report. Patients with chronic cancer pain may fail to display any signs of adrenergic stimulation such as tachycardia and hypertension even though the patient reports severe pain
Cancer pain can be classified as
nociceptive, neuropathic, or a combination of the two.
Nociceptive pain
results when pain-sensing neuronal
pathways are stimulated and function normally. Specialized receptors at the distal end of neuronal axons, termed
nociceptors, detect noxious mechanical, chemical, and thermal stimuli and generate neuronal electrical activity. These signals are transmitted normally along neuronal
pathways to the brain.
Nociceptive pain
can originate from somatic or visceral
sources, or both.
Somatic pain
originates from skin, muscle, bone, and fascia. It is mediated by the somatic nervous
system. As innervation is highly specific, localization of the pain is precise. Somatic pain is often described as sharp, aching, or throbbing.
Visceral pain
originates from internal
structures. It is mediated by the autonomic nervous system. As there is a lack of specificity of innervation, and considerable neuronal crossover, visceral pain is typically
difficult for the patient to localize or describe, and may encompass an area that is much larger than might be expected
for a single organ. Visceral pain is often characterized as crampy.
Neuropathic pain
defined as a primary lesion or dysfunction of the pain-sensing nervous system. The
lesion can be either peripheral in the somatic or visceral
nervous system, or central. The nerves themselves may be
subject to damage from compression, infiltration, ischemia, metabolic injury, or transection. The myelin sheath that insulates one nerve from another may also be damaged.
neuropathic pain may also be caused by
dysfunction of the nervous system, as in central facilitation or “wind-up” where an event that is normally not painful, such as the pressure from a bed sheet or clothing
on the chest of patient with recurrent breast cancer, causes
pain.
Neuropathic pain is often described as
burning, shooting, stabbing, or electric-like, and may be associated with numbness, tingling, and/or sensory deficits.
The temporal profile of a pain will provide further clues to
its etiology
The patient should be asked about the duration of the pain. When did it first start? How long has it
been present? Did it come on slowly, or suddenly? One can ask what the baseline or background pain is like. Does it vary over time, such as worse at night? Is the patient ever pain-free? Are there times when the pain gets much worse? What factors exacerbate or relieve the pain, such as
by activity, touch, clothing, cold/heat, procedures, and so on.
Back pain
that occurs only with weight bearing could indicate
a spinal bony metastasis.
Cancer pain is also frequently associated with
intermittent
paroxysms of pain that occur with activity (e.g., movement,
chewing, swallowing, breathing, defecating, urinating,
dressing, touch, etc.) or during a procedure.
Sequential measurement of severity using a validated severity
assessment scale will provide
an indication of the changing intensity of the pain experienced by a given patient over
time. It will also guide analgesic management. A numerical analog scale is the simplest.
numerical analog scale
The patient is
asked to indicate the severity of the pain on a 11-point scale where 0 represents “no pain” and 10 represents the
“worst possible pain.”
use to identify the relevant pathophysiology leading to a pain
state.
Together with a careful physical examination and select laboratory and imaging studies,
The concept of “total pain” emphasizes that multiple nonphysical factors can also contribute to pain, that is,
psychological factors (e.g., anxiety, depression), social factors (e.g., familial estrangement), and spiritual or existential factors (e.g., loss of meaning in life, fear of death).
use to identify the relevant pathophysiology leading to a pain
state.
Together with a careful physical examination and select laboratory and imaging studies,
World Health Organization (WHO) ladder: Step One
Acetaminophen and the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs) including acetylsalicylic acid
(ASA) are the mainstay of step one of the WHO analgesic ladder for the management of mild pain
World Health Organization (WHO) ladder:Step Two
Several opioid analgesics are conventionally
available in combination with acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or ASA and are commonly used to manage moderate pain. tramadol (that has
a unique combination of weak opioid activity with other analgesic properties), meperidine, and codeine (methylmorphine, which has one-tenth the potency of morphine),
the opioids in this class are close in potency to morphine (mg for mg
The concept of “total pain” emphasizes that multiple nonphysical factors can also contribute to pain, that is,
psychological factors (e.g., anxiety, depression), social factors (e.g., familial estrangement), and spiritual or existential factors (e.g., loss of meaning in life, fear of death).
World Health Organization (WHO) three-step ladder for cancer pain
management
If the pain is mild (1/10 to 3/10), an analgesic can be chosen
from step one. If it is moderate (4/10 to 6/10), one can start with an analgesic from step two. If it is severe (7/10 to 10/10), one can start with an opioid from step three. At any step, adjuvant analgesics can be added to optimize pain
control.
World Health Organization (WHO) three-step ladder: Step One
Acetaminophen and the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs) including acetylsalicylic acid
(ASA) are the mainstay of step one of the WHO analgesic ladder for the management of mild pain
World Health Organization (WHO) three-step ladder:Step Two
Several opioid analgesics are conventionally
available in combination with acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or ASA and are commonly used to manage moderate pain. tramadol (that has
a unique combination of weak opioid activity with other analgesic properties), meperidine, and codeine (methylmorphine, which has one-tenth the potency of morphine),
the opioids in this class are close in potency to morphine (mg for mg
“weak” opioids
They are used in combination, they have a ceiling to their analgesic potential due to the maximum amounts of
acetaminophen or ASA that can be administered per 24 hr (e.g., 4 g acetaminophen per 24 hr).
when a step-two drug inadequately relieves pain patients may
combine two or more medications, or take more than the prescribed amount in an attempt to obtain pain relief. In doing so they may unknowingly put themselves at increased risk for significant toxicity from either the acetaminophen or ASA component
of the medication.
World Health Organization (WHO) ladder: Step Three
The pure agonist opioid analgesics comprise
step three of the WHO analgesic ladder. Morphine is the
prototypical drug because of its ease of administration and
wide availability. Many patients with chronic pain are best managed with an appropriately titrated strong
opioid that is combined with one or more coanalgesics
World Health Organization (WHO) ladder: Step Four
should be reserved for patients whose pain is not controlled by competent use of the analgesic approaches outlined in the first three steps. In general, “step four” involves invasive approaches for pain
relief that can be summarized as follows. Subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) administration of opioid analgesics and coanalgesics may be required for patients in whom oral (PO), buccal mucosal, rectal (PR),
or transcutaneous approaches are not possible or practical,
or in whom doses of oral opioids lead to undesirable adverse effects.
Adverse effects may be minimized as a
result of
the uniform delivery of the drug parenterally, the
change in route of administration, or the reduction in firstpass
metabolite production.
Acetaminophen
it is analgesic and antipyretic, it is not anti inflammatory, at least systemically
Acetaminophen toxicity
Acetaminophen is associated with significant liver toxicity.
It is generally recommended that the total dose not exceed 4 g per 24 hr for routine dosing of patients with
normal liver function.
Cyclooxygenase (COX)
enzyme catalyzes the
conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins and thromboxanes. These inflammatory mediators sensitize nerve endings to painful stimuli and stimulate a group of silent nociceptors that only fire in an inflammatory milieu. In the spinal cord, COX plays a role in setting up the dysfunctional
signaling pattern involved in neuropathic pain.
NSAIDs
potent anti-inflammatory medications that inhibit the activity of COX and decrease the levels of these inflammatory mediators. As a result, there is less
sensitization of nerve endings, less recruitment of silent
nociceptors, and less risk of central “wind-up.”
adverse effects of NSAIDs
Inhibition of COX
leads to inhibition of platelet aggregation and microarteriolar
constriction/decreased perfusion, particularly in
the stomach and kidneys. In the stomach the relative
ischemia compromises the production of gastric mucus by the chief cells, and significantly increases the risk of gastric erosions and bleeding. In the kidneys the relative
ischemia increases the risk of renal papillary necrosis and renal failure
COX exists in two forms
a constitutive form, COX-1, and a form that is inducible under conditions of inflammation, COX-2. There are both COX-2-selective and nonselective NSAIDs that target both forms of COX.
adverse effects of two forms of COX
Whereas renal insufficiency is a risk of both nonselective and COX-2-selective
NSAIDs, the risk of gastropathy and platelet inhibition is significantly decreased with COX-2-selective NSAIDs.
Patient at increased
risk for adverse effects from NSAIDs
Patients (particularly the elderly) who are dehydrated,
malnourished, cachectic, or have a history of nausea, gastritis, or gastric ulceration with NSAIDs
To minimize the risk of ischemia
the patient should
be well hydrated. The use of an H2 blocking antacid (e.g. cimetidine or ranitidine) to treat NSAID dyspepsia and
abdominal pain does not prevent gastric erosions and gastrointestinal
bleeding. Only misoprostol, a prostaglandin- E analog that reverses the effect of NSAIDs on the microarteriolar
circulation of the stomach, and the proton-pump inhibitors (such as omeprazole, pantoprazole) have been
shown to heal gastric erosions and reduce the risk of significant
gastric bleeding.
useful in patients who are thrombocytopenic
and for whom other NSAIDs are contraindicated
nonacetylated salicylates (choline magnesium trisalicylate and salsalate), nabumetone, and the COX-2 inhibitors do not significantly affect platelet aggregation.
Sulindac is thought to be least likely to induce renal failure because of
its minimal effect on prostaglandin synthesis at the level of the proximal renal tubule
In contrast to the opioids, the NSAIDs and acetaminophen
have a
ceiling effect to their analgesic potential, do
not produce pharmacologic tolerance, and are not associated with physical or psychological dependence
Opioid analgesics
act by binding to opioid receptors of three subtypes (mu, kappa, and delta) both peripherally and centrally.
most important for mediating analgesia of opioids
The central receptors in the spinal cord and
brain
opioid analgesics in common usage may be divided into
full agonists, partial agonists, and mixed agonist–antagonists. The pure agonist drugs are the most useful in chronic cancer pain.
mixed agonist–antagonist opioids
pentazocine, butorphanol, and nalbuphine
partial agonist opioids
buprenorphine
poor choices for patients with severe pain.
mixed agonist–antagonist opioids
partial agonist opioids