Chapter 66 Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Flashcards
D’Amico et al. Intermediate Risk criteria for prostate cancer
T2b or T2c
PSA 10-20ng/mL
GS 7
D’Amico et al. High Risk criteria for prostate cancer
T3a
PSA > 20ng/mL
GS 8-10
D’Amico et al. Locally advanced prostate cancer criteria
T3b or T4
D’Amico et al. reported percentage of positive biopsy core(PPC) as independant prognostic factor. Mention PPC with similar outcome as Low risk and High risk prostate cancer
50% PPC has similar outcome to high risk
In Radical Prostatectomy, High PPC is associated with what adverse pathological features?
ECE Seminal vesicle invasion Positive surgical margin Positive Lymphovascular invasion Positive Perineural invasion Positive pelvic lymph node involvement
Recent meta-analysis of 4 RTOG trials, what factor was associated with reduced PCSM(Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality) and metastasis?
Older age >70 years
Describe target volume for prostate cancer
Prostate
Seminal vesicles
Obturator nodes
Proximal internal and external iliac nodes
Occasionally Common iliac, Para arotic, and even peri rectal nodes are included
Describe conventional portal design for prostate cancer
4 fields
AP-PA
Superior L5-S1
Inferior 2 cm distal to membranous urethra
Lateral 1.5-2 cm lateral to pelvic brim
Opposed Lateral
Anterior anterior most aspect of pubic symphysis
Posterior S2-3 interspace
Wang Chesebro et al. Conventional 4 fields vs IMRT, state the coverage difference in terms of target volume and normal tissue sparing in prostate cancer
Conventional plan 70.3% vs IMRT 96.2% (dose coverage of 45Gy)
95% prescribed dose received by rectum and bladder, IMRT reduced 23% and 80% respectively.
Lawton et al. What is the proposed dose constraints for rectum, bladder, femoral head, small bowel during prostate treatment
Rectum V50Gy
Chen et al. Isocenter shift of 5 or 10 mm in superior direction could reduce by how much percentage of nodal target coverage?
11% and 26% respectively
Shariat et al. Studied RT-PCR/hk2(Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction/human glandular kallikrein 2) mRNA expression in histologically normal pelvic nodes in pT3N0 prostate cancer. What were the finding of occult lymph nodes involvement?
20% and 40% had occult positive and equivocal results of pelvic lymph nodes
Bader et al. What percentage of internal iliac lymph nodes were positive in limited pelvic nodal dissection in prostate cancer?
58% with positive lymph node disease
Heidenreich et al. What was the reported incidence of lymph nodes involvement between standard and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer?
26% in extended vs 12% in standard
Wawroschek et al. found about a third of sentinel lymph nodes outside the limited node dissection in prostate cancer. What are those regions?
Presacral
Hypogastric
Pararectal
What is the accuracy of Roach et al formula for predicting nodal involvement in prostate cancer?
80%
In prostate cancer, recommended cutoff of >=15% to decide whether to treat pelvic nodes led to about a third with nodal involvement.Abdollah et al. what was the recommended cutoff to be lowered?
6%
RTOG-9413 (Landmark trial for prostate cancer). What are the arms studied and which one has better outcome and worst toxicities?
PORT(Prostate Only RT)
WPRT followed by PORT: late G3-5 GI toxicity seen
4 mths of neoadjuvant and concurrent hormones+WPRT : significantly better outcome(59.6%) of 4-year progression free survival than other arms
PORT+4 mths of adjuvant harmones
WPRT+4 mths of adjuvant harmones: updated RTOG-9413 has significantly greater incidence of G3-5 GI toxicities than other arms
To address controversies of WPRT in prostate cancer, RTOG-0924 identified subset of patient from RTOG 9413 who benefited from WPRT. What were criteria incorporated?
Estimated nodal risk of atleast 15%
GS 7-10 and T1c-T2b and PSA 50% biopsies) and PSA 20ng/mL
RTOG 0924 what is treatment recommendation in favor to WPRT in prostate cancer?
WPRT 45Gy(3DCRt/IMRT)
PORT 34.2Gy boost(IMRT) to complete 79.2Gy
Also permitted for boost
LDR brachy 110Gy I-125
100Gy Palladium-103
HDR brachy 15Gy/1 fnx Iridium-192
When is brachytherapy preferred after pelvic RT in prostate cancer?
1-2 weeks after
University of California-San Francisco(UCSF) treatment recommendation for low risk prostate cancer?
PORT
No hormonal therapy
University of California-San Francisco(UCSF) treatment recommendation for favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer?
PORT
Neoadjuvant(2 mths) + concurrent ADT
University of California-San Francisco(UCSF) treatment recommendation for unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer?
WPRT
Neoadjuvant(2 mth) + concurrent ADT
+_ adjuvant ADT(2 mth)
University of California-San Francisco(UCSF) treatment recommendation for high risk prostate cancer?
WPRT
Neoadjuvant (2 mth) + concurrent + adjuvant (24-36 mth) ADT
University of California-San Francisco(UCSF)
Describe preparation of rectum and bladder during CT simulation in prostate cancer.
Rectum should be emptied with enema prior to simulation
Full bladder during simulation and treatment
Describe the IMRT technique used for prostate cancer.
7-field isocenter if technique with 18-MV photons.