Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Fundamental Morals II > Chapter 6: The Nature, Structure, and Evaluation of the Moral Act > Flashcards

Chapter 6: The Nature, Structure, and Evaluation of the Moral Act Flashcards

1
Q

SUBJECT of Morality

A

the PERSON insofar as they act FREELY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Human Acts

A

the acts of the Free Will and the acts of other faculties governed or freely consented to

what distinguishes the human act, and therefore the Moral Act, is the fact of being VOLUNTARY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Acts of Man

A

PHYSIOLOGICAL Processes (e.g. digestion) or REFLEX Actions; acts of man are carried out IN men more so than BY men;

they are INVOLUNTARY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Voluntary Acts

A

an act which Proceeds from an Intrinsic Principle and is accompanied by Formal Knowledge of the End

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Voluntariness

A

CONSCIOUS and DELIBERATE tendency of Personal Will towards its End

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Characteristics of Voluntariness

A

1) Active
2) Self-Referential
3) Immediate Expression of the Person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Elicited Acts

A

acts Exercised DIRECTLY by the Will (to love, hate, decide)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Commanded Acts

A

Acts REALIZED IMMEDIATELY by some faculty Other Than the Will (the intellect, the arms, the eyes) Under the Influence and Motion of the Will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Direct Objects of the Will

A

the GOOD (real or apparent) Apprehended by the Reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2 Types of Goods Willed in themselves

A

1) HONEST GOOD - willed in itself because it is Thought to be OBJECTIVELY Good in Itself
2) PLEASING GOOD - can be willed in itself because it causes in me a “POSITIVE AFFECTIVE RESONANCE” (pleasure, satisfaction, joy, etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

FINALIZED GOOD (or USEFUL GOOD)

A

NOT an End, but rather is put in Relation to an End and thus enters into the Direct Object of the Will, even if in a Secondary way

  • it is the MEANS

NOT to be Confused with Indirect Object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Indirect Object of the Will

A

Consequences of the action (collateral effect) which is NOT in any way WILLED, either as End or as Means, but IS Foreseen and Permitted as INEVITABLY LINKED to that which is Willed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intention

A

an elicited act of the will consisting in the Effective Willing Of an End that, in reality, is DISTANT from us, such that it is NOT Immediately Realizable, but has to be Realized by Means of a SERIES of Actions aimed at it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Choice

A

elicited Act of the Will that has For Its Object the Action Immediately Realizable in view of the desired end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3 Elements Morality of Humans Acts Depend on

A

1) the MORAL OBJECT
2) the END
3) the CIRCUMSTANCE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Moral Object (finis operis)

A

object of the act of choice which gives the moral species to an act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

End (finis operantis)

A

the OBJECTIVE for which the Agent ORDERS HIS ACTION, that is, that which he Wants to Obtain Through the Chosen action or actions; it is, therefore, the PRINCIPAL MOTIVE OF the ACTION

18
Q

Role of END in Moral Evaluation

A
  • Actions which are INDIFFERENT in their Object become GOOD or EVIL Based on Account of their END
  • Actions GOOD in their Object (good in themselves) can, on account of their end, become:
    1) Morally Better
    2) Morally Worse (for mixed intentions)
    3) Evil
  • Actions EVIL in their Object can, through the INTENTION, become More or Less Evil
19
Q

Circumstances

A

SECONDARY ELEMENTS that INFLUENCE the MORALITY of the Moral Act

20
Q

Aquinas Definition of Circumstances

A

whatever Conditions are OUTSIDE the SUBSTANCE of an act and yet in some way touch the Human Act

i.e. the “ACCIDENTS” of the act

21
Q

Circumstances related to the Moral Object

A
  • TIME
  • PLACE
  • QUANTITY of object
  • EFFECTS of action
22
Q

Circumstances regarding the Agent

A
  • CONDITION of the SUBJECT who acts
  • MODE of acting
  • MEANS employed
  • Circumstantial MOTIVES
23
Q

5 Principles of the Moral Imputability of Consequences

A

1) We ARE Responsible for the NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES of our evil actions, EVEN IF these Consequences were Not Foreseen: though having been foreseeable
2) The Good Consequences of Evil Actions CANNOT be ascribed as Merit to the agent
3) We ARE NOT Responsible for the Unforeseeable Negative Consequences of our Good Actions.
4) We are not responsible for the foreseen negative consequences of the omission of an evil or forbidden action
5) One is NOT CULPABLE for the Foreseen Negative consequences of a good action, so long as the action meets the conditions proposed in our discussion of the principle of double effect

24
Q

Principle of Double Effect

A

Determines WHEN it is LICIT to Perform an Action which, Beyond its Good Effects, INVOLVES SOMETHING which is MORALLY EVIL; also called “INDIRECT WILL”

25
Q

Conditions of Double Effect

A
  • The act must be IN ITSELF GOOD or at least INDIFFERENT
  • The good effect must NOT Be Achieved by EVIL MEANS
  • The person must DIRECTLY SEEK the Good Effect
  • There is PROPORTIONALITY Between the GOOD INTENDED and the EVIL TOLERATED
26
Q

Circumstances concerning knowledge which modify imputability

A
  • Advertance

- Ignorance

27
Q

ADVERTENCE (awareness)

A

the mental act by which a person REALIZES What he is ABOUT TO DO or is doing And the MORALITY of the ACTION

28
Q

Differentiation of Advertence

A

INTENSITY:

  • Full Advertence
  • Partial Advertence
  • Inadvertence

MODALITY:
(In)Advertence of LAW vs. (In)Advertence of FACT

ACTUALITY:
Actual vs. Virtual Advertence

SCALE:
Distinct (clear) vs. Generic (confused) Advertence

29
Q

Moral Principles regarding Advertence

A

1) An action is Morally Imputable if realized with At Least VIRTUAL Advertence, since it is Sufficient to guarantee the LIBERTY of the act
2) Generic Advertence of the morality is sufficient for the moral act
3) Partial Advertence DIMINISHES FREEDOM and so DIMINISHES IMPUTABILITY

30
Q

Ignorance

A
  • does NOT refer to an obstacle which impedes the application of the act of knowledge which one normally possesses
  • rather, it is an ERRONEOUS UNDERSTANDING Of the CIRCUMSTANCES Of the Action AND, above all, ITS MORALITY
31
Q

Instances of Lack of Voluntariness

A
  • Non-Voluntary Actions
  • Involuntary Actions
  • Mixed Actions
32
Q

Consent

A

FREE TURNING Of the Will (approval, acquiescence) TOWARD the GOOD (real or apprehended) PRESENTED BY the INTELLECT

33
Q

Differentiation of Consent

A

DEGREE of Consent:

  • Perfect
  • Imperfect

ACTUALITY of Consent:

  • Actual
  • Virtual
34
Q

Moral Principles regarding Consent

A

1) For the morality of the act, Imperfect Consent is sufficient, which follows a Partial Advertence, or full advertence but with a incomplete acquiescence of the will
2) For Mortal Sin, PERFECT CONSENT is REQUIRED, though it is compatible with a certain reluctance and mixed Voluntariety
3) The reality of our free nature implies that, with normal advertence and if there does NOT EXIST External Coercion, Consent can be said to be PERFECT when the Act is ACCOMPLISHED EXTERNALLY.

4) SIGNS of Types of Consent:
- Consent which DEEPLY CHANGES PERSONAL BEHAVIOR is Assumed to be PERFECT
- With Partial Advertence, Consent is presumed Partial
- If its Simple to Perform the act and it is NOT DONE then it is presumed that the Consent was IMPERFECT

35
Q

Relation of Passions to Moral Imputability

A
  • Antecedent Passions
  • Concomitant Passions
  • Consequent Passions
36
Q

5 Principles regarding Relation of FEAR and Moral Imputability

A

1) Fear DIMINISHES VOLUNTERIETY, though normally DOES NOT NEGATE it
2) Positive Law does not oblige in case of Grave Fear
3) Negative Moral Law does oblige even with grave fear
4) To OVERCOME Fear is a Sign of GREATER VOLUNTARINESS
5) Fear can RENDER NULL or at least RESCINDABLE certain Acts which Require FULL FREEDOM (e.g. marriage)

37
Q

Merit

A

RETRIBUTION OWED to an Action or Type of Conduct

38
Q

“DE CONDIGNO” Merit

A

owed in JUSTCE, proper to CHRIST ALONE

39
Q

“DE CONGRUO” Merit

A

supposes a Certain SUITABILITY, taking account of the generosity of the giver

40
Q

Conditions of Merit

A
  • The act must be a HUMAN ACT
  • The act must be GOOD
  • The act must be OF A PERSON as Viator (this life)
  • The act must be accomplished by a person in the STATE OF GRACE
  • The DEGREE of merit Depends on the QUALITY OF LOVE of the person
  • If the doctrine of merit is understood correctly, the Christian will never become an egotistical reward seeker

Fundamental Morals II (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions