Chapter 6 State and National Powers Flashcards
How does our constitution protect liberty from tyranny?
- Structurally 2. Checks on Governmental Power
Structurally
Enumerated Powers/ Federalism. i.e. Commerce Clause.
Checks On Governmental Power
Bill of Rights. i.e. First Amendment, and Fifth Amendment (taking clauses).
Independent Checks On Power. i.e. Due process and Equal Protection.
Shay’s Rebellion (Highlighted a big problem with a confederation)
Here farmers were in debt, they bought things on credit. Merchants went to court to have farmers get fields seized and taken away.The farmers armed themselves, and they performed an armed rebellion in Massachusetts (citizen militia). There was no federal government or army to help! Only Massachusetts militia could fight back, no one was united! BIG PROBLEM!
Issues Facing the Founders Involving Avoiding Tyranny
- Worried about minority rights (must protect the minimum rights of minorities). 2. Wanted a government to protect the borders, strong economic system, etc. but not strong to be oppressive. 3. (Still exists today) Established a public that needed to be selfless, needed to be interested in the public good! Republican virtue.
The Philadelphia Convention and a Federal Republic
In 1787 also known as the Constitutional Convention, laid down the blueprint for a new nation.
Federal Republic: single republic confederated of state governments and a national government.
Police Power
All the other government powers other than the enumerated powers. The power to regulate the health, safety, welfare, and morals of the citizenry. State governments have police power! Nothing to do with literal police forces, has to do with policing or regulating society.
Enumerated Powers
Only those powers specifically spelled out in the constitution and granted to the national government. Powers that the national or federal government has.
Key Point about National vs. State Powers
The National government is very powerful, but only in those areas of power specifically spelled out in the Constitution. In all other areas, the States rule. Think about the conflict in Arkansas about the school. Here the state government was going against the federal government!
The Commerce Clause
When the Great Depression occurred, the Commerce Clause was used to heavily regulate the economy by the government! (through agencies).
“The Congress shall have Power To . . . Regulate Commerce with foreign Nations and among the several States and with the Indian Tribes.”
U.S. vs. Darby (1941)
1) They ask the question: Where does the federal government (in constitution) tell me what I should pay my employers?). If the state passed a minimum wage law, then Darby must have had to follow it!
2) Government says: “ We are in a depression, few people have jobs, so we want people can have a decent amount of job to have money to use, survive, and put back into economy”.
3) As a result, this is a national crisis, we need a national minimum wage, not a state alone one, we need this to be done nationally as there is a national interest!
4) Federal Wage and Hour Law: $0.25/hour; time and a half after 44 hours/week.
Wickard vs. Filburn (1942)
1) He asks the question: Where does the federal government get off and can tell me how much (crops) I can grow on MY personal property?
2) Government says: “This is a national problem, if we allow everyone to ignore the quota; and say everything we are growing beyond the quota is useless, we need a national solution across state boundaries! Even the most local activity can be regulated because that act could impact the state commerce and national commerce.
3) Agricultural Adjustment Act: Quotas on crops in order to control supply (and, therefore, price).
Heart of Atlanta Motel vs. U.S. (1964) and Katzenbach vs. McClung (1964)
1) Where does the federal government get off and tell us who we can and cannot serve? (Their question).
2) Government says: Its about the right to travel! If people can’t rely to get in restaurants or hotels in different states, then they are infringing on the right to travel. As a federal government we have the right to even monitor small local motels to protect these rights.
U.S. vs. Lopez (1995)
Background: You cannot bring a gun to school,Lopez brings a gun to school, and gets charged from Texas for breaking the law. Texas turns Lopez over to the federal government.
1) His question: Where does the federal government get off, making any decisions in schools and matters in school; I thought they could only regulate commerce?
2) Federal government says: “Violent crime costs victims money and that risked is covered by insurance, insurance is a national policy, therefore this is a national issue we are equaling.Guns in school interfere with educational process, therefore we are making sure we have an education being done equally. Its about the right to travel or relocate, people will be able to move and relocate with safety
3) Federal government DOES NOT buy into these arguments above! The Court: The Federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990is unconstitutional.
4) The commerce rule is going to stop here!
Gonzales vs. Raich (2005)
California Medical Marijuana Statute allows use of marijuana with doctor’s prescription and supervision. The Court UPHELD the Federal Law criminalizing marijuana possession under the Commerce Clause power. The federal government can regulate the use of marijuana if it can influence interstate commerce! (no matter how small).