Chapter 6 Flashcards
3 Principles of Commodity taxes
- who pays the price does not depend on who writes the check to the government
- who pays the price does depend of relative elasticities
- Commodity taxation raises revenue and creates deadweight loss (ie reduces gains from trade)
Tax on supply curve
Shifts supply curve up by the price of the tax
Tax on demand curve change
Shifts curve down and to the left by price of tax
Subsidy given to buyers (demand curve)
Shifts demand curve up and to the right by the size of the subsidy
Requiring businesses to pay for worker’s health insurance
Insurance mandate is like a tax
Demand for labor is elastic (can get it from multiple places)
Supply of labor is inelastic
More burden of the tax falls on workers
Elasticity on Subsidies and Taxes
Elastic: less burden of tax & less benefit of subsidy
Inelastic: more burden of tax & less benefit of subsidy
Deadweight Loss in Subsidies example: California cotton
Farmers in California get subsidized water from the government to help them grow cotton (they pay $20-30 and receive water that costs ~$200-500)
Waste of resources bc the conditions in California are not meant for cotton, could be grown for less elsewhere & money in California could be used more productively.
Demand: more elastic -> California cotton could be easily substituted w cotton grown elsewhere
Supply: more inelastic, farmers lobby for water subsidies
Wage subsidies
Makes hiring low wage workers cheaper (firms pay less, employees receive more) thus increasing demand for labor
How to create the smallest deadweight loss from a 10$ tax
Have market w inelastic supply & demand
There is a tax on a good with elastic supply and demand. If the government increases the size of the tax by 50%, what happens (deadweight loss & revenue)
Tax revenue increases by less than 50%, and deadweight loss increases by more than 50%.
i.e. deadweight loss will always increase more than tax revenue w increased taxes
Subsidy given to suppliers (supply curve)
Shifts supply curve down and to the right by size of the subsidy