Chapter 19 Flashcards
Private goods, Common Resources, Club Goods & Public goods
Private goods:
Excludable & Rival
Must be purchased before consumption
Common Resources:
Non-excludable & rival
can be consumed by anyone but it’s availability diminishes
Club goods
Excludable & non-rival
Individuals can be prevented from consuming but their consumption does not reduce availability to others
Public goods
Non-excludable & Non-Rival
no one can be prevented from consuming & use doesn’t reduce availability to others

Excludable/Non-Excludable
Excludable: people who don’t pay can easily be prevented from using the good
Nonexcludable: people who don’t pay can not be easily prevented from using the good
Rival Non Rival
Rival: one person’s use reduces availability for everyone
Non Rival: One persons use does not reduce availability for everyone
Government Solutions for Public Goods
Force beneficiaries to pay: forcing people to pay for public goods in the form of take that they normally would not want to pay for to better benefit everyone
Forced Rider: forcing people to pay for things they do not want (e.g. using my taxes to build a wall I don’t support)
Market Solutions Public Goods
Advertisers: Television and radio are public goods (non-exclusive & non rivalry) funded by bystanders who benefit from viewers wanting to buy their products (advertisers)
So effective that it causes services that easily be excludable to be non-excludable (Google can make profit while providing services for free)
Public Goods
Non-excludable & Non-Rival
No one can be prevented from consuming them & use doesn’t reduce availability to others
It’s difficult to get people to voluntarily pay for them so markets will often underprovide them
Free riders: Someone who enjoys the benefits of a public good without paying the costs
Common Resources & problem
Non-excludable but Rival
You can’t stop someone from accessing the resource but using the resources prevents someone else from having access
Tragedy of the Commons: Common resources overused & undermaintained
e.g. ocean fish, fishers racing to get all the fish so they disappear quickly. If a fisher decides to be responsible & not overfish, another will just take his produce not leaving any for the future. Responsibility is not beneficial.
Solution for the tragedy of commons
Individual transferable quotas: government allowances that only let people (e.g. fishers) take a given amount of the resource (e.g. fish)
- New Zealand issued ITQS on fish specific to region & population was replenished over time
- BUT difficult to coordinate worldwide
- Also applies to pollution (like tradable allowance)
Property Rights (& 2 examples)
- Institution that uses self-interest to avoid the tragedy of the commons
- Creates incentives for owners to take care of resources because they make a profit when they are well maintained
- Maintaining common goods w/o property rights only produces external benefits not internal benefits so no one does it
- E.g. African elephant dying populations
- Countries w no property rights -31%
- Countries w local property rights +34%
- Countries w national Property rights +56%
- Mao Communist China
- Made all food a common good & started a famine
- Villagers started property rights & had bountiful harvest