Chapter 5: Will Components & Provisions Flashcards

1
Q

What is the doctrine of INTEGRATION (aka the Staple Rule)?

A

Restatement (Third) of Property §3.5 Integration of Multiple Pages Into Single Will

To be treated as part of a will, a page or other writing must be present when the will is executed and must be intended to be part of the will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the doctrine of INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE?

A

UPC §2-510

A writing in existence when a will is executed may be incorporated by reference if the language of the will manifests this intent and describes the writing sufficiently to permit its identification. Neither the testator’s handwriting nor signature is required for incorporation.

External writing may be incorporated if:

  1. “In existence” at time of will execution
    - Future writings cannot be incorporated
    - But external writing does not need to be present at will execution
  2. The will manifests intent to incorporate by reference
  3. The will clearly identifies the external writing [sometimes a matter of interpretation]

Unless contested, the external writing is usually not probated or a matter of public record.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What types of documents are most suitable for incorporation by reference rather than inclusion in the will?

A
  • Contracts concerning succession
  • Inter vivos trust
  • Prenuptial agreement
  • Divorce decree provisions relating to property settlement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY LIST?

A
  1. Flexible option for disposing of tangible personal property
  2. TPP list:
  • Must be signed by the testator, but witness attestation not required
  • Must be referred to in will
  • May be created and amended after will’s execution
  • Very common in practice
  1. Exempts tangible personal property list from:
  • “In existence” requirement under incorporation by reference doctrine
  • Acts of independent significance doctrine

FLORIDA: A written statement or list referred to in the decedent’s will shall dispose of items of tangible personal property, other than property used in trade or business, not otherwise specifically disposed of by the will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the UPC approach to tangible personal property lists?

A

UPC 2-513. Separate Writing Identifying Devise of Certain Types of Tangible Personal Property

Whether or not the provisions relating to holographic wills apply, a will may refer to a written statement or list to dispose of items of tangible personal property not otherwise specifically disposed of by the will, OTHER THAN MONEY. To be admissible under this section as evidence of the intended disposition, the writing must be SIGNED by the testator and MUST DESCRIBE the items and the devisees with reasonable certainty. The writing may be referred to as one to be in existence at the time of the testator’s death; it may be prepared before or after the execution of the will; it may be altered by the testator after its preparation; and it may be a writing that has no significance apart from its effect on the dispositions made by the will.

  • A gaping loophole around the witness attestation requirement?
  • Some states limit the value of property disposable by TPP list (Cal.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

HYPO: In year 1, Testator executes an attested will that reserves the right to make a separate Gift By Memorandum for TPP… Year 2, Testator drafts and signs a Gift by Memorandum disposing of TPP… Year 3, Testator revokes “all prior wills” and executes a new will that reserves the right to make a separate Gift by Memorandum for TPP… Year 4, Testator dies.

Did will executed in Year 3 revoke the Gift by Memorandum signed in Year 2?

A

NO. As a separate writing under UPC §2-513, the Gift by Memorandum is not a testamentary disposition or instrument. It has NO EFFECT standing alone; rather, its effectiveness relies on the existence of a validly executed will. Consequently, it was not revoked by the revocation clause of the subsequent will… TPP memo executed in Year 2 validated by TPP provision of will executed in Year 3.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the doctrine of ACTS OF INDEPENDENT SIGNIFICANCE?

A

A devise may identify its object (beneficiary) or subject (the gift) by reference to future acts, events, or occurrences.
- Lifetime motive a significant factor

UPC §2-512: Events of Independent Significance

A will may dispose of property by reference to acts and events that have significance apart from their effect upon the dispositions made by the will, whether they occur before or after the execution of the will or before or after the testator’s death. The execution of revocation of another’s will is such an event.

EXAMPLE: A testator’s will says that he devises his car at death to S… Testator has a toyota at the time but then gets a jaguar… The will is valid for S to get the Jag.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happens when a testator executes a will in contemplation of marriage?

A

UPC §2-512 does not interfere w/ that practice bc a person still has lifetime motive for entering into a marriage.

  • Grounds for contesting the devise to wife might be based on an alleged sham marriage or undue influence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the rule for CONDITIONAL WILLS?

A

Statements of motivation, when phrased as a condition, can invalidate a will if the condition is NOT satisfied.

Estate of Rick, (La. Ct. App. Feb. 5, 2024)
- Holographic will (2014) was conditioned upon him dying from heart surgery
- He survived the surgery and then died in 2016
- The Court held that the will had to be read literally, didn’t apply unless he died during heart surgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the various classifications of DISPOSITIVE PROVISIONS?

A
  1. Devise / bequest / legacy
    - Specific, general, demonstrative, residuary devise
  2. Power of appointment – flexibility on who gets what
  3. Testamentary trust – doesn’t exist until the will becomes effective; terms in the will
  4. External donative instruments incorporated by reference
    - Inter vivos trust (pour over)
    - List of tangible personal property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a specific devise?

A

A gift of particular assets or items of property

EXAMPLE: “I leave my house to my wife”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a general devise?

A

Gift of money in a specified amount

EXAMPLE: $10,000 to my former Trusts & Estates professor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a demonstrative devise?

A

Gift of money in a specified amount and payable from a particular source or account.

EXAMPLE: I leave $10,000 to my former Trusts & Estates professor to be paid from the sale of my diamond collection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a residuary devise?

A

Gift of everything not given away elsewhere in the will.

EXAMPLE: All the rest, residue, and remainder of my estate, I leave to my wife.

  • Every will should include a residuary clause
  • Without one, property not covered by specific, general, or demonstrative devises passes by intestacy.
  • Not adding one could be grounds for legal malpractice.
  • Residuary clause should anticipate the possibility of predeceased beneficiaries by naming multiple contingent beneficiaries.

FLORIDA: Crucial to have a residuary clause because a handwritten note signed by the testator naming a contingent beneficiary (that wasn’t in the will) is NOT valid because holographic wills are invalid in Florida. See Aldrich v. Basile (Fla. 2014).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are POWERS of APPOINTMENT?

A
  • A conveyance in which a donor delegates donative authority to one or more donees.
  • Powers of appointment can be drafted into an inter vivos gift instrument (e.g., a trust) or a will.
  • It’s a way of conveying property that empowers donees to make decisions about when and who should receive a gift.
  • It allows the donor to set parameters for how the donee may exercise the power of appointment.
  • It facilitates sophisticated forms of wealth transfer tax planning

Restatement (Third) of Property § 17.1: A power of appointment is a power that enables the donee of the power to designate recipients of beneficial ownership interests in or powers of appointment over the appointive property.

EXAMPLE: “I give my house to my partner for life, and then to whomever my partner appoints by will.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Powers of Appointment: VOCABULARY

A

Donor creates the power

Donee holds the power and has the right to exercise it

Objects are people to whom the power allows the donee to appoint the property

Takers in default receive the property if the donee doesn’t exercise the power

A general power is one that the donee can exercise in favor of either herself, of her creditors, or her estate, or the creditors of her estate

A special power is one that the donee can’t exercise in favor of either herself, or her creditors, or her estate, or the creditors of her estate

Example: T’s will gives his stock portfolio to his cousin C for life, and then to any of T’s siblings to whom C appoints by deed or will.
- T is the donor and C is the donee. C holds a special power bc C can’t appoint to herself (or to her creditors, or to…)

  • Compare: if T’s will said that C could appoint to “anyone” then C would hold a general power, bc C could appoint to any one of the following: C, C’s creditors, C’s estate, or the creditors of C’s estate. Likewise, if C could appoint to “C’s creditor,” the power would be general.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the rule for TAX TREATMENT regarding powers of appointment?

A

General Rule = A transfer is taxable to the person who last possessed dominion and control over the property prior to the transfer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Is the creation of a power of appointment taxable? If so, to whom?

A
  • Generally, yes – to the donor
  • It’s a transfer from the donor to the donee
  • Any transfer tax liability is paid by the donor (gift tax) or by the donor’s estate (estate tax)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Is the exercise of a power of appointment taxable? If so, to whom?

  • What about income generated by the appointive property before the donee exercises the power?
  • What happens if the donee never exercises the power?
A

Donee of a GENERAL POWER is treated as the owner of appointive property under the federal income, estate, and gift tax laws. This is true even if the donee does not actually appoint the property to herself.

  • Income generated prior to exercise IS TAXABLE to the donee
  • Exercise of general power during life in favor of third party IS TAXABLE to the donee as gift to the objects
  • Exercise or non-exercise of general power at death in favor of third party causes appointive property to be included in the donee’s taxable estate

Donee of a non-general or special power is not treated as the owner of appointive property for federal tax purposes bc the donee cannot appoint the property to herself.

  • Income that accumulates in trust is taxable to the trust, not to the donee
  • Special gift & estate tax rules for trusts:
    Donee of special power may be authorized to…
       A. “Consume, invade, or appropriate property for the 
         benefit of the possessor which is limited by an 
         ascertainable standard relating to health, education, 
         support, or maintenance” of the donee.
       
       B. withdraw greater of $5,000 or 5% of the trust corpus
            each year. 

So long as the donee lacks power to appoint the rest of the property to the donee herself, the donee’s creditors, the donee’s estate, or creditors of the donee’s estate (otherwise power may be general), exercising power re: balance does NOT trigger a taxable transfer by the donee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the REQUISITES for exercise of a power of appointment?

A

Restatement (Third) of Property § 19.1

A power of appointment is exercised to the extent that:

(1) the donee manifests an intent to exercise the power in an otherwise effective document;

(2) the donee’s expression of an intent to appoint satisfies the formal requirements of exercise imposed by the donor and applicable law; and

(3) the donee’s appointment constitutes a permissible exercise of power.

21
Q

What happens if a power is released or is not properly executed?

A

Gift-in-default clause controls.

If no gift-in-default clause:

  • General Power: unappointed property passes to —
    • The power holder, if permissible appointee and living
    • The power holder’s estate, if permissible appointee & deceased
    • Otherwise reverts to donor or donor’s estate.
  • Non-General Power: unappointed property passes to —
    • the permissible appointees if permissible appointees are defined and limited and not contrary to donor’s intent
    • Otherwise reverts to donor or donor’s estate.
22
Q

What do FIDUCIARY PROVISIONS allow testators to do?

A

Fiduciary provisions allow testators to:

  • Select a trustworthy fiduciary
  • Define powers of fiduciary to transact on behalf of the estate
  • Modify default fiduciary duties imposed on personal representative; exculpate fiduciary from personal liability

Fiduciary provisions are often boilerplate, but any modification of default rules should be carefully considered

  • Default fiduciary powers are very broad; personal representative has all the powers of an owner of property.
  • A fiduciary who abuses those powers can be removed and held personally liable for damages to the estate.
23
Q

What is the rule for priority among persons seeking appointment as personal representative?

A

UPC §3-203

(a) Whether the proceedings are formal or informal, persons who are not disqualified have priority for appointment in the following order:

(1) The person with priority as determined by a probated will including a person nominated by a power conferred in a will (thumb on the scale)

(b) Objections to an appointment must take place in a formal proceeding.

(f) No person under 21 or a person whom the court finds unsuitable in formal proceedings is not entitled to be a personal representative

General Rule: The personal representative is the party with standing to litigate claims that could have been brought by decedent during life.

24
Q

What rules apply when the DRAFTING ATTORNEY of the will is appointed as EXECUTOR?

A
  • An executor does not require legal training.
  • Attorneys must comply w/ ethical constraints governing solicitation of business when recommending that clients appoint them as executor.
25
Q

When a will appoints a DRAFTING ATTORNEY as EXECUTOR, may that lawyer also provide legal services to the estate?

A

Yes, if the potential conflict of interest was discussed with the client and the client gave informed consent.

26
Q

What POWERS do the PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE hold?

A

Default fiduciary powers established by statute.
- UPC §3-711: “A personal representative has the same power over the title to property of the estate that an absolute owner would have… This power may be exercised WITHOUT notice, hearing, or order of court.”

Best practice usually favors conferring PR with broad fid powers to reduce admin costs incurred when seeking court approval for routine transactions and decisions.
- Personal liability for breach of fiduciary duty serves as a potent deterrence against abuse of PR’s powers.

Many estate planning attorneys recycle stock language for fiduciary powers from one will to the next.

27
Q

How is appointment as personal representative get terminated?

A

UPC § 3-611

(a) A person interested in the estate may petition for removal of a PR for cause at any time…

(b) Cause for removal exists when removal would be in the best interests of the estate, or if it is shown that a PR or the person seeking his appointment INTENTIONALLY MISREPRESENTED MATERIAL FACTS in the proceedings leading to his appointment, or that the PR has DISREGARDED an ORDER OF THE COURT, has become INCAPABLE OF DISCHARGING THE DUTIES of his office, or has MISMANAGED THE ESTATE or failed to perform any duty pertaining to the office.

28
Q

How are personal representatives COMPENSATED?

A

UPC § 3-719: Reasonable Compensation Standard

A PR is entitled to REASONABLE COMPENSATION for his services. If a will provides compensation for the personal rep and there is no contract with the decedent regarding compensation, he may renounce the provision before qualifying and be entitled to reasonable compensation.

29
Q

What are the rules for FIDUCIARY LIABILITY and EXCULPATION?

A

UPC § 3-712 (Liability): If the exercise of power is improper, the personal rep is liable to interested persons for damage or loss resulting from breach of fid duty to the same extent as a trustee of an express trust.

UTC §1008 (EXCULPATION): An exculpatory clause is unenforceable if it relieves the trustee of liability for breach of trust committed in bad faith or with reckless indifference to the purposes of the trust or the interest of the beneficiaries; or was inserted as the result of an abuse by the trustee of a fiduciary or confidential relationship to the settlor.

  • EXAMPLE: “No Trustee shall be liable to any person interested in this Trust for any act or default unless it results from the Trustee’s bad faith, willful misconduct, or gross negligence.”
30
Q

Do personal representatives have to post BOND before administering an estate?

P.77

A

Many states require a personal rep to post bond before administering an estate to protect beneficiaries and creditors against mismanagement, fraud, and embezzlement.

Testators can waive the bonding requirement by including an express waiver in the will.

Most testators waive bond to avoid incurring costs during the bond premium.
- In recent sample of NJ testate estates, 97% of the wills waived the bonding req

Testators usually rely on other protections against mishandling of the estate
- Selecting a trustworthy executor
- Personal liability for breach of fiduciary duty
- Court supervision of probate administration (where required)

Under the UPC, bond is not required in informal administration

31
Q

May an interested party petition the probate court for an order mandating the PR post bond?

A

UPC § 3-605

Any person apparently having an interest in the estate worth more than $5k, or any creditor having a claim more than $5k may make a written demand that a PR give bond.

32
Q

What are NO CONTEST CLAUSES?

A

A technique for deterring will beneficiaries from litigation challenging the estate.

A “no contest” AKA in terrorem clause penalizes a contestant for litigating an unsuccessful claim
- Typically, the penalty is disinheritance of the will
Finish on slides

To avoid triggering the penalty, a contestant must:
- Prevail in the litigation and thus set aside the will containing the no contest clause.
- Prove that the no contest clause is unenforceable or
- Demonstrate that the no contest clause does NOT apply to the contestant’s particular claim (i.e., clause bars claims of invalidity, not not will interpretation)

33
Q

What is the PENALTY rule for NO CONTEST CLAUSES?

A

UPC § 2-517: A provision in a will purporting to penalize an interested person for contesting the will or instituting other proceedings relating to the estate is UNENFORCEABLE if PROBABLE CAUSE exists for instituting proceedings.

FLORIDA: A provision in a will purporting to penalize any interested person for contesting the will or instituting other proceedings relating to the estate is UNENFORCEABLE.

34
Q

What are property management options for INHERITANCE BY MINOR CHILDREN?

A
  • Outright devise of property (triggers need for guardianship or conservatorship)
  • Testamentary trust for minor children
  • Custodianship under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act
35
Q

How to invoke the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act?

A

Devise of property to X “as custodian for (name of minor) under the [name of enacting State] UTMA.”

36
Q

What are the CUSTODIAN’S POWERS & DUTIES under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act?

A

UTMA § 14(a)

Custodian may deliver or pay to the minor or expend for the minor’s benefit so much of the custodial property as the custodian considers advisable for the use and benefit of the minor, without court order and without regard to (i) the duty or ability of the custodian personally or of any other person to support the minor or (ii) any other income or property of the minor which may be applicable or available for that purpose.

37
Q

Who may bring litigation concerning custodianship under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act?

A

UTMA § 19(a)

A minor who has attained the age of 14 years, the minor’s guardian of the person or legal representative, an adult member of the minor’s family, a transferor, or transferor’s legal representative may petition the court (i) for accounting by the custodian or the custodian’s legal representative; or (ii) for a determination of responsibility as between the custodial property and the custodian personally, for claims against the custodial property….”

38
Q

When does custodianship TERMINATE under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act?

A

UTMA § 20

Custodianship terminates upon the earlier of the minor’s 21st birthday or death.

39
Q

How to appoint a GUARDIAN?

A

UPC § 5-202(a)

A guardian may be appointed by will or other signed writing by a parent for any minor child the parent has or may have in the future.

40
Q

When does parental appointment of a guardian become effective?

A

UPC § 5-202(c)

Upon the appointing parent’s death, an adjudication that the parent is an incapacitated person, or a written determination by a physician who has examined the parent that the parent is no longer able to care for the child, whichever first occurs.

41
Q

For parental appointment of guardian, what if there’s another surviving parent?

A

UPC § 5-202(g)

The appointment of a guardian by a parent does not supersede the parental rights of either parent. If both parents are dead or have been adjudged incapacitated persons, an appointment by the last parent who died or was adjudged incapacitated has priority.

42
Q

When does guardianship terminate?

A

UPC § 5-202(i)

The authority of a guardian appointed under this section terminates upon the first to occur of the appointment of a guardian by the court or the giving of written notice to the guardian of the filling of an objection pursuant to § 5-203.

43
Q

HYPO (Just Debts Clauses/Exoneration): T owns a house that is subject to a $100,000 mortgage. T’s will leaves the house to Andy and the residue of his estate to Brenda and Carlos. Does Andy take the house and assume the responsibility for paying the mortgage? Or does Andy take the house free of the mortgage, so that the rest of T’s estate must pay off the mortgage (therefore reducing Brenda and Carlos’s shares)?

A

In most states, the modern
default rule is non-exoneration:
we assume that T wanted the
beneficiary who receives real
estate to pay off any mortgage.
So we presume that Andy is
responsible for the mortgage. BUT…

Most wills also instruct the executor to
pay T’s “just debts.” A mortgage is a
debt, and the executor is supposed to
use the residue to pay obligations of
the estate.

Under the UPC, a generic “just
debts” clause does NOT require
the residuary beneficiaries to
pay off the remaining mortgage
balance on specifically-devised real property.

NOTE: “Given the trend in other states to limit the common law doctrine by requiring specific language indicating an intent to exonerate devised property, it would be inappropriate to interpret general language such as “just debts” as evincing an intent to exonerate property passing outside probate.” In re Estate of Vincent (Tenn. 2003).

44
Q

Just Debt Clause HYPOS:

Carmel died, leaving a valid will that gives her house to her daughter, Kristi, and the residue of her estate to her son, Brandon. The house is subject to a $100,000 mortgage. Carmel also owned
$200,000 in cash. Under the UPC, who gets what in the following scenarios?

  1. Carmel’s will requires her executor to “pay her just debts.”
  2. Carmel’s will requires her executor to “pay her just debts, other than
    those relating to real property.”
  3. Carmel’s will requires her executor to “pay her just debts, including
    those relating to real property.”
  4. Carmel’s will says nothing about paying her debts.
A
  1. Under the UPC, a bare direction to pay debts is insufficient to rebut presumption of non-exoneration. So Kristi would inherit house subject to the mortgage; Brandon would inherit $200,000 from the residue.
  2. Same result. This provision clearly and expressly states the testator’s intent not to exonerate debt on real property.
  3. This language is probably sufficient to override the UPC’s non-exoneration default. So Kristi would take the house free of the mortgage, and Brandon would inherit only $100,000 from the residue.
  4. The will’s silence means the non-exoneration default rule applies. So Kristi inherits the house
    subject to the mortgage.
45
Q

What is the rule for TAX APPORTIONMENT under the UPC?

A

UPC § 3-9A-104(1): “the estate tax is apportioned RATABLY to each person that has an interest in the apportionable estate”

  • A will may alter the default apportionment rule, such as by directing all estate taxes to be paid from the residuary estate.

NOTE: Under 26 U.S.C. § 2002, “The tax imposed by this chapter shall be paid by the executor.”

46
Q

What is a NEGATIVE will?

A
  • A negative will excludes an individual or class or individuals from inheriting property from the testator by intestacy.
  • Enforceable under the UPC, but not under the common law.
  • Testators should exercise caution when disinheriting classes of potential heirs to avoid escheat.
47
Q

What is the UPC rule for NEGATIVE wills?

A

UPC § 2-101. Intestate Estate.
(b) A decedent by will may expressly exclude or limit the right of an individual or class to succeed to property of the decedent passing by intestate succession. If that individual or a member of that class survives the decedent, the share of the decedent’s
intestate estate to which that individual or class would have succeeded passes as if that individual or each member of that class had disclaimed his [or her] intestate share.

COMMENT: By specifically authorizing so-called negative wills, subsection (b) reverses the usually accepted common-law rule, which defeats a testator’s intent for no sufficient reason.

48
Q
A