Chapter 5 / Week 5: SGM's and CPM's Flashcards
Strategic Group Analysis
Ebook pages 46-51 (ebook 44-49)
The best technique for revealing the market position of industry competitors is ______________
Strategic group mapping
Strategic group definition
consists of those industry members with similar competitive approaches and positions in the market.
Companies in the same strategic group can resemble one another in a variety of ways
1) They may have comparable product-line breadth,
2) sell in the same price/quality range,
3) employ the same distribution channels,
4) depend on identical technological approaches,
5) compete in much the same geographic areas, or
6) offer buyers essentially the same product attributes or similar services and technical assistance.
Strategic group mapping
is a technique for displaying the different market or competitive positions that rival firms occupy in the industry.
The procedure for constructing a strategic group map is straightforward:
How to conduct this
1) Identify the competitive characteristics that delineate strategic approaches used in the industry.
2) Plot the firms on a two-variable map using pairs of these variables.
3) Assign firms occupying about the same map location to the same strategic group.
4) Draw circles around each strategic group, making the circles proportional to the size of the group’s share of total industry sales revenues.
1) Identify the competitive characteristics that delineate strategic approaches used in the industry.
Typical variables used in creating strategic group maps are price/quality range (high, medium, low), geographic coverage (local, regional, national, global), product-line breadth (wide, narrow), degree of service offered (no frills, limited, full), use of distribution channels (retail, wholesale, Internet, multiple), degree of vertical integration (none, partial, full), and degree of diversification into other industries (none, some, considerable).
2) Plot the firms on a two-variable map using pairs of these variables.
Nothing more to add
3) Assign firms occupying about the same map location to the same strategic group.
Nothing more to add
Draw circles around each strategic group, making the circles proportional to the size of the group’s share of total industry sales revenues.
Nothing more to add
Several guidelines need to be observed in creating strategic group maps
Tips / Tricks for group maps
First, the two variables selected as axes for the map should not be highly correlated; if they are, the circles on the map will fall along a diagonal and reveal nothing more about the relative positions of competitors than would be revealed by comparing the rivals on just one of the variables.
Second, the variables chosen as axes for the map should reflect important
differences among rival approaches—when rivals differ on both variables, the locations of the rivals will be scattered, thus showing how they are positioned differently.
Third, the variables used as axes don’t have to be either quantitative or continuous; rather, they can be discrete variables, defined in terms of distinct classes and combinations.
Fourth, drawing the sizes of the circles on the map proportional to the combined sales of the firms in each strategic group allows the map to reflect the relative sizes of each strategic group
Fifth, if more than two good variables can be used as axes for the map, then it is wise to draw several maps to give different exposures to the competitive positioning relationships present in the industry’s structure—there is not necessarily one best map for portraying how competing firms are positioned.
Strategic group maps reveal
which companies are close competitors and which are distant competitors.
The second thing to be gleaned from strategic group mapping is that
not all positions on the map are equally attractive.
Two reasons account for why some positions can be more attractive than others:
1) Prevailing competitive pressures from the industry’s five forces may cause the profit potential of different strategic groups to vary
2) Industry driving forces may favor some strategic groups and hurt others.
1) Prevailing competitive pressures from the industry’s five forces may cause the profit potential of different strategic groups to vary
The profit prospects of firms in different strategic groups can vary from good to poor because of differing degrees of competitive rivalry within strategic groups, differing pressures from potential entrants to each group, differing degrees of exposure to competition from substitute products outside the industry, and differing degrees of supplier or customer bargaining power from group to group.
2) Industry driving forces may favor some strategic groups and hurt others.
Likewise, industry driving forces can boost the business outlook for some strategic groups and adversely impact the business prospects of others.
Mobility barriers
restrict firms in one strategic group from entering another more attractive strategic group in the same industry.
Studying competitors’ past behavior and preferences provides a valuable assist in
anticipating what moves rivals are likely to make next and outmaneuvering them in the marketplace.
Michael Porter’s SOAR Framework for Competitor Analysis
points to four indicators of a rival’s likely strategic moves and countermoves.
Michael Porter’s SOAR Framework for Competitor Analysis four indicators
1) Rival’s Strategy
2) Objectives
3) Assumptions about itself and industry
4) Resources and capabilities
behavioral proclivities
what competitive moves a rival is likely to make and how they are likely to react to the competitive moves of your company—its probable actions and reactions.
Current Strategy
To succeed in predicting a competitor’s next moves, company strategists need to have a good understanding of each rival’s current strategy, as an indicator of its pattern of behavior and best strategic options.
Questions to consider include: How is the competitor positioned in the market? What is the basis for its competitive advantage (if any)? What kinds of investments is it making (as an indicator of its growth trajectory)?
Objectives
An appraisal of a rival’s objectives should include not only its financial performance objectives but strategic ones as well (such as those concerning market share)
Poorly performing rivals are virtually certain to make fresh strategic moves.
Resources and Capabilities
A rival’s strategic moves and countermoves are both enabled and constrained by the set of resources and capabilities the rival has at hand. Thus a rival’s resources and capabilities (and efforts to acquire new resources and capabilities) serve as a strong signal of future strategic actions (and reactions to your company’s moves). Assessing a rival’s resources and capabilities involves sizing up not only its strengths in this respect but its weaknesses as well
Assumptions
How a rival’s top managers think about their strategic situation can have a big impact on how the rival behaves. Banks that believe they are “too big to fail,” for example, may take on more risk than is financially prudent. Assessing a rival’s assumptions entails considering its assumptions about itself as well as about the industry it participates in.
Performance Differences within the same Industry: Strategic Groups; Pages 127-130
Performance Differences within the same Industry: Strategic Groups; Pages 127-130