Chapter 5 -- The Ethical Cycle Flashcards
ill-structured problem
problem that has no definitive formulation of the problem, may embody inconsistent problem formulations, and can only be defined during the process of solving the problem
ethical cycle
tool in structuring and improving moral decisions by making a systematic and thorough analysis of the moral problem, which helps to come to a moral judgement and to justify the final decision in moral terms
moral problem
problem in which two or more positive moral values or norms cannot be fully realized at the same time
moral dilemma
moral problem with the crucial feature that the agent has only two (or a limited number of) options for action and that whatever he chooses he will commit a moral wrong
ethical cycle
Case → Moral problem statement → problem analysis → options for action → ethical evaluation → reflection → moral acceptable action
where are the feedback loops in the ethical cycle
Problem analysis & moral problem statement
Ethical evaluation & problem analysis
Reflection & options for action
Reflection & problem analysis
stakeholders
actors that have an interest in the development of a technology; Can be individuals, colleagues, groups
black and white strategy
a strategy for action in which only two options for actions are considered: doing the action and not
strategy of cooperation
action strategy that is directed at finding alternatives that can help to solve a moral problem by consulting other stakeholders
whistle blowing
speaking to the media or the public on an undesirable situation against the desire of the employer
intuitivist framework
ethical framework in which options for action are evaluated on basis of one’s view about what is intuitively most acceptable and that formulates arguments for this statement
common sense method
method that weighs the available options for actions in the light of the relevant values
moral deliberation
an extensive and careful consideration or discussion of moral arguments and reasons for and against certain actions
overlapping consensus
an agreement on the level of moral judgements, while there may be disagreement on the level of moral principles and background theories; each of the participants should be able to justify the overlapping consensus in terms of his or her own wide reflective equilibrium