Chapter 5 : Modernity, Multiplicity, and Becoming Flashcards
During the 19th century, what significant historical change was happening and what change of orientation occurred in literature and criticism?
What did literary criticism shift its focus to?
What artistic movement was giving way to Aestheticism and what did this represent?
This was a time of rapid change (Industrial Revolution) and there was a change of orientation in literature and criticism from the ideal world to the world of history.
The new question became:
What is the relationship between the literary text and the historical context?
Romanticism was giving way to Aestheticism and during this transition, the Romantic unity of the self was giving way to MULTIPLICITY.
In literature, a discernible shift from Eliot to Thomas Hardy / Henry James in authorial voice, going from an omniscient third person narrator, who stands above the many characters’ perspectives.
For Karl Marx, modernity emerges out of what new economic system?
Capitalism.
How do Marx and Engels describe capitalism? What do they critique?
For them, capitalism is at once good and evil. It is this way because it brings about unprecedented, rapid and unceasing change.
Good because it has the power to sweep away old powers and authorities.
Capitalism is like Prometheus bringing fire to man.
Evil because (similar to Shelley) they condemn the gap between the rich and the poor.
What do Marx and Engels consider foolish about the bourgeois class in Europe during the Industrial Revolution?
They consider the bourgeois class as callous and stupid, failing to look after the perpetuation of the working class, on which it relies for profits.
What did Robert Owen write and what does he call for in this work?
He wrote “A New View of Society” (1813-16) and in it, he calls for legislative reform of industrial conditions as a high priority for British public.
What did Thomas Carlyle write and what does he argue?
Carlyle was one of the great Victorian “sages” and wrote the pamphlet, “Chartism”. In Chapter 6, Laissez-Faire, he argues against and rejects the laissez-faire principles.
In “Past and Present” he argues a paternalistic neofeudal model of reform.
John Ruskin was an ____ and ______.
Influenced by Mahatma Gandhi, he wrote __________, which was a _______ for a _________.
art critic and thinker.
Unto This Last ; moral case ; living wage
William Morris responded to Ruskin and founded the _______ movement in the 1860s.
This movement can be described as : ____________.
Arts and Crafts Movement
An anti-industrialist applied arts and design movement valorizing traditional materials and craftsmanship as a part of a larger focus on social and economic reform.
In George Eliot’s theoretical elaboration of 19th century “realism” or “classical realism”, she posits what two goals as the aim of of her art?
Truth and sympathy.
Both must come together and both are required.
For Eliot, what is truthfulness (5 parts)?
- Involves CLOSE OBSERVATION
of external reality, likens her art to life drawing - Aspires to DEMOCRATIC INCLUSIVENESS
- Observes and describes the COMPLEXITY OF CHARACTER, the complexity of internal reality
(real people are inconsistent - the good and bad are entangled within them)
- Truthfulness involves a sense of MORAL SERIOUSNESS and RESPONSIBILITY
- Involves an ANXIOUS RECOGNITION of difficulties: the author is a mirror but the mirror is doubtless defective because of a DIVIDED SOCIETY.
According to Eliot, why does art involve an anxious recognition of difficulties? What are these difficulties that arise?
While the author is a mirror, the mirror is defective because of a DIVIDED SOCIETY.
The difficulties that arise are the following:
(one has to summon formidable powers of observation and social sympathy in order to avoid unwittingly projecting one’s own class perspective on others)
(another difficulty is language because one word stands for many things and many words for one)
(Eliot however embraces the “fitful shimmer of many hued significance” rejecting “a patent deodarized and nonresonant language”)
While affirming truthfulness in the above senses, Eliot self-consciously examines its limits elsewhere and explores the limits of observation.
Describes the continuities and discontinuities Eliot shares/inherits with/from :
Romanticism
the 18th century realist novel
Charles Dickens
Romanticism:
Eliot shares Wordsworth’s serious treatment/sympathy for low and rustic life and shares Shelley’s social sympathy
18th Century Novel:
Shares observation, attention to past and present, common people, complex characters. But treats people comically / or as light entertainment.
Charles Dickens:
Shares in a reforming spirit and both avoid idealization and demonization of characters.
The novels of Eliot and Dickens also share an elastic form. What does this mean?
Their realism includes the romantic side of familiar things (the imagination).
Thrive on metaphor and metonymy.
Recognize differences of perspective and shifting perspectives ( HETEROGLOSSIA : many lanugages coming into one; MAN CODES - noting that there is more than one voice in the community)
Work to avoid falsehood and a dogmatic imposition of empty formulae on life
How does Dickens differ from Eliot? What change occurs from Dickens to Eliot?
From Dickens to Eliot, an increased attention to psychological realism occurs.
In Eliot’s view, Dickens had not avoided idealization and demonizations.
In Thomas Hardy and Henry James, what is emphasized even more?
In Hardy and James, the study of literary characters’
SUBJECTIVITY
PASSIONS
IMPRESSIONS
is intensified.