Chapter 5 - Logic Flashcards

1
Q

One of the first mathematicians to make a serious study of symbolic logic was?

A

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

He tried to advance the study of logic from a merely philosophical subject to a formal mathematical subject.

A

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Leibnitz tried to advance the study of logic from a merely philosophical subject to a formal mathematical subject. Leibnitz never completely achieved this goal; however, several mathematicians, such as? contributed to the advancement of symbolic logic as a mathematical discipline.

A

Augustus De Morgan and George Boole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Logic main goal?

A

use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

To analyze an argument, we break it down into smaller pieces:

A

statements, logical connectives and quantifiers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Every language contains different types of sentences, such as statements, questions, and commands.

A

Logic Statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Every language contains different types of sentences, such as?

A

statements, questions, and commands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The symbolic logic that Boole was instrumental in creating applies only to sentences that are?

A

statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

is a declarative sentence that is either true or false (but not both at the same time)

A

statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

is a statement that conveys a single idea.

A

simple statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

consists of simple statements combined using logical connectives like and, or, not, if…..then.

A

compound statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

statement must have the opposite truth value to the original statement

A

negation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • a simple statement is either true (T) or false (F).
  • a compound statement depends on the truth values of its simple statements and its connectives.
A

truth value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

a table that shows the truth value of a compound statement for all possible truth values of its simple statements.

A

truth table

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

all, every, each. Statement is true if the claim is true for every object it is referring to.

A

Universal quantifier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

some, there exists, for at least one.
Statement is true if the claim is true for atleast one object it is referring to.

A

Existential quantifier

17
Q

a compound statement for all possible truth values of the component statements

A

truth value

18
Q

If there are n component statements, then the truth table has

A

2^n rows

19
Q

is a statement that is always true.

A

tautology

20
Q

is a statement that is always false.

A

self-contradiction

21
Q

Two statements are? if they have the same truth value for every possible situation, and we write p = q

A

equivalent

22
Q

will use? to determine whether logical arguments are valid or invalid.

A

deductive reasoning

23
Q

A logical argument is made up of?

A

premises and conclusion

24
Q

An argument is? if the fact that all the premises are true forces the conclusion to be true.

A

valid

25
Q

An argument that is not valid is?

A

invalid, or a fallacy

26
Q

The three dots are a symbol for?

A

therefore