chapter 5 - business level strategy Flashcards
Michael Porter presented three generic strategies a firm can use to overcome the five forces and achieve competitive advantage..
- cost leadership
- differentiation
- focus strategy
The first, overall cost leadership, is based on creating a low-cost position. Here a firm must manage the relationships throughout the value chain and lower costs throughout the entire chain.
Second, differentiation requires a firm to create products and/or services that are unique and valued. Here the primary emphasis is on “non-price” attributes for which customers will gladly pay a premium.
Third, a focus strategy directs attention (or focus) toward narrow product lines, buyer segments, or targeted geographic markets, and they must attain advantages through either differentiation or cost leadership.
Each of Porter’s generic strategies has the potential to allow a firm to
outperform rivals in their industry.
markets served vs competitive advantage:
broad target market + low cost position
overall cost leadership
markets served vs competitive advantage:
broad target market + superior perceived value by customer
broad differentiation
markets served vs competitive advantage:
narrow target market + low cost position
cost focus
markets served vs competitive advantage:
narrow target market + superior perceived value by customer
differentiation focus
stuck in the middle
unsuccessful in competitive advantage
overall cost leadership
the first generic strategy as described by porter….
Aggressive construction of efficient-scale facilities.
Vigorous pursuit of cost reductions from experience.
Tight cost and overhead control.
Avoidance of marginal customer accounts.
Cost minimization in all activities in the firm’s value chain, such as R&D, service, sales force, and advertising.
The first generic strategy is overall cost leadership. Overall cost leadership requires a tight set of interrelated tactics that include:
Aggressive construction of efficient-scale facilities.
Vigorous pursuit of cost reductions from experience.
Tight cost and overhead control.
Avoidance of marginal customer accounts.
Cost minimization in all activities in the firm’s value chain, such as R&D, service, sales force, and advertising.
experience curve
A factor often central to an overall cost leadership strategy is the experience curve, which refers to how business learns to lower its costs as it gains experience with production processes. With experience, unit costs of production decline as output increases in most industries. The experience curve, developed by the Boston Consulting Group in 1968, is a way of looking at efficiency gains that come with experience
cumulative experience (experience curve cont.)
“For a range of products, as cumulative experience doubles, costs and labor hours needed to produce a unit of product decline by 10 to 30 percent. There are a number of reasons why we find this effect.
Among the most common factors are workers getting better at what they do, product designs being simplified as the product matures, and production processes being automated and streamlined.
competitive parity
To generate above-average performance, a firm following an overall cost leadership position must attain competitive parity on the basis of differentiation relative to competitors.
In other words, a firm achieving parity is similar to its competitors, or “on par,” with respect to differentiated products. Competitive parity on the basis of differentiation permits a cost leader to translate cost advantages directly into higher profits than competitors. Thus, the cost leader earns above-average return
failure to attain competitive parity example
The failure to attain parity on the basis of differentiation can be illustrated with an example from the automobile industry—the Tata Nano. Tata, an Indian conglomerate, developed the Nano to be the cheapest car in the world. At a price of about $2,000, the Nano was expected to draw in middle-class customers in India and developing markets as well as budget conscious customers in Europe and North America. However, it hasn’t caught on in either market. The Nano doesn’t have some of the basic features expected with cars, such as power steering and a passenger side mirror. It also faces concerns about safety. In crash tests, the Nano received zero stars for adult protection and didn’t meet basic UN safety requirements. Also, there were numerous reports of Nanos catching fire.
competitive parity lesson
“The lesson is simple. Price is just one component of value. No matter how good the price, the most cost-sensitive consumer won’t buy a bad product.”
2 firms that built cost leadership positions
aldi and zulily
Aldi, a discount supermarket retailer, has grown from its German base to the rest of Europe, Australia, and the United States by replicating a simple business format. Aldi limits the number of products (SKUs in the grocery business) in each category to ensure product turn, to ease stocking shelves, and to increase its power over suppliers
“Zulily, an online retailer, has built its business model around lower-cost operations in order to carve out a unique position relative to Amazon and other online retailers. Zulily keeps very little inventory and typically orders products from vendors only when customers purchase the product.
A business that strives for a low-cost advantage must attain
an absolute cost advantage relative to its rivals.
This is typically accomplished by offering a no-frills product or service to a broad target market using standardization to derive the greatest benefits from economies of scale and experience. However, such a strategy may fail if a firm is unable to attain parity on important dimensions of differentiation such as quick responses to customer requests for services or design changes
Overall Cost Leadership: Improving Competitive Position vis-à-vis the Five Forces
An overall low-cost position enables a firm to achieve above-average returns despite strong competition. It protects a firm against rivalry from competitors, because lower costs allow a firm to earn returns even if its competitors erode their profits through intense rivalry.
A low-cost position also protects firms against powerful buyers. Buyers can exert power to drive down prices only to the level of the next most efficient producer.
Also, a low-cost position provides more flexibility to cope with demands from powerful suppliers for input cost increases.
Potential Pitfalls of Overall Cost Leadership Strategies
- Too much focus on one or a few value-chain activities.
- Would you consider a person to be astute if they canceled their newspaper subscription and quit eating out to save money but then maxed out several credit cards, requiring them to pay hundreds of dollars a month in interest charges? Of course not. Similarly, firms need to pay attention to all activities in the value chain - Increase in the cost of the inputs on which the advantage is based.
- Firms can be vulnerable to price increases in the factors of production. For example, consider manufacturing firms based in China that rely on low labor costs. - A strategy that can be imitated too easily.
- One of the common pitfalls of a cost leadership strategy is that a firm’s strategy may consist of value-creating activities that are easy to imitate. Such has been the case with online brokers in recent years. - A lack of parity on differentiation.
- As noted earlier, firms striving to attain cost leadership advantages must obtain a level of parity on differentiation.20 Firms providing online degree programs may offer low prices. However, they may not be successful unless they can offer instruction that is perceived as comparable to traditional providers - reduced flexibility
- Building up a low-cost advantage often requires significant investments in plant and equipment, distribution systems, and large, economically scaled operations. As a result, firms often find that these investments limit their flexibility, leading to great difficulty responding to changes in the environment.
Obsolescence of the basis of cost advantage.
Ultimately, the foundation of a firm’s cost advantage may become obsolete. In such circumstances, other firms develop new ways of cutting costs, leaving the old cost leaders at a significant disadvantage. The older cost leaders are often locked into their way of competing and are unable to respond to the newer, lower-cost means of competing. This is the position that discount investment advisors now find themselves.
ex: Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade challenged traditional brokers with lower cost business models. Now, they find themselves having to respond to a new class of robo-advisor firms, such as Betterment, that offer even lower cost investment advice using automated data analytic-based computer systems
differentiation strategy
As the name implies, a differentiation strategy consists of creating differences in the firm’s a products or services by creating an image that is perceived industry wide as unique and valued by customers.
differentiation forms
Prestige or brand image (Hotel Monaco, BMW automobiles).
Quality (Apple, Ruth’s Chris steak houses, Michelin tires).
Technology (Martin guitars, North Face camping equipment).
Innovation (Medtronic medical equipment, Tesla Motors).
Features (Cannondale mountain bikes, Ducati motorcycles).
Customer service (Nordstrom department stores, USAA financial services).
Dealer network (Lexus automobiles, Caterpillar earthmoving equipment).
nike and differentiation
Beyond customer-specific learning, firms can gain great insights based on the collective behavior of customers.
For example, Nike can quickly detect how the population is shifting in levels of activity and time of use of its products. As the sensors in shoes indicated that people were doing more walking and hiking early in the COVID pandemic period, Nike was able to use that data to shift its product line and marketing to meet this emerging demand.
differentiation and cost
Firms achieve and sustain differentiation advantages and attain above-average performance when their price premiums exceed the extra costs incurred in being unique. Thus, a differentiator will always seek out ways of distinguishing itself from similar competitors to justify price premiums greater than the costs incurred by differentiating. Clearly, a differentiator cannot ignore costs. After all, its premium prices would be eroded by a markedly inferior cost position.
Therefore, it must attain a level of cost parity relative to competitors. Differentiators can do this by reducing costs in all areas that do not affect differentiation