chapter 1 - strategic management Flashcards
two perspectives of leadership
the “romantic” and the “external control” perspectives.
romantic view of leadership
romantic view of leadership. Here, the implicit assumption is that the leader is the key force in determining an organization’s success—or lack thereof.
This view dominates the popular press in business magazines such as Fortune, Bloomberg Businessweek, and Forbes, wherein the CEO is either lauded for their firm’s success or chided for the organization’s demise
EX: steve jobs and apple’s emergence as the most valuable firm in the world
“On the other hand, when things don’t go well, much of the failure of an organization can also, rightfully, be attributed to the leader
external control view of leadership
the external control view of leadership.
Here, rather than making the implicit assumption that the leader is the most important factor in determining organizational outcomes, the focus is on external factors that may positively (or negatively) affect a firm’s success.
We don’t have to look far to support this perspective. Developments in the general environment, such as economic downturns, new technologies, governmental legislation, or an outbreak of major internal conflict or war, can greatly restrict the choices available to a firm’s executives
strategic management
Strategic management consists of the analyses, decisions, and actions an organization undertakes in order to create and sustain competitive advantages. This definition captures two main elements that go to the heart of the field of strategic management.
steps of strategic management
First, the strategic management of an organization entails three ongoing processes: analyses, decisions, and actions. Strategic management is concerned with the analysis of strategic goals (vision, mission, and strategic objectives) along with the analysis of the internal and external environments of the organization.
Next, leaders must make strategic decisions. These decisions, broadly speaking, address two basic questions: What industries should we compete in? How should we compete in those industries? These questions also often involve an organization’s domestic and international operations.
And last are the actions that must be taken. Decisions are of little use, of course, unless they are acted on.
Firms must take the necessary actions to implement their strategies. This requires leaders to allocate the necessary resources and to design the organization to bring the intended strategies to reality.
- analyses, decisions and actions
- decisions
- actions
- strategies
essence of strategic management
The essence of strategic management is the study of why some firms outperform others. Thus, managers need to determine how a firm is to compete so that it can obtain advantages that are sustainable over a lengthy period of time. That means focusing on two fundamental questions:
- How should we compete in order to create competitive advantages in the marketplace?
- Managers need to determine if the firm should position itself as the low-cost producer or develop products and services that are unique and will enable the firm to charge premium prices. Or should they do some combination of both? - How can we create competitive advantages in the marketplace that are unique, valuable, and difficult for rivals to copy or substitute?
- That is, managers need to make such advantages sustainable rather than temporary.”
operational effectiveness
The popular management innovations of the last two decades—total quality, just-in-time, benchmarking, business process reengineering, outsourcing—are all about operational effectiveness.
Operational effectiveness means performing similar activities better than rivals. Each of these innovations is important, but none lead to sustainable competitive advantage because everyone is doing them
strategy
“Strategy is all about being different. Sustainable competitive advantage is possible only by performing different activities from rivals or performing similar activities in different ways.”
the four key attributes of strategic management
- Directs the organization toward overall goals and objectives
- Includes multiple stakeholders in decision making
- Incorporates short-term and long-term perspectives
- Recognizes trade-offs between efficiency and effectiveness
the four key attributes of strategic management - 1. Directs the organization toward overall goals and objectives
“First, strategic management is directed toward overall organizational goals and objectives. That is, effort must be directed at what is best for the total organization, not just a single functional area. Some authors have referred to this perspective as “organizational versus individual rationality.”
That is, what might look “rational” or ideal for one functional area, such as operations, may not be in the best interest of the overall firm.”
“For example, operations may decide to schedule long production runs of similar products to lower unit costs. However, the standardized output may be counter to what the marketing department needs to appeal to a demanding target market
the four key attributes of strategic management - 2. Includes multiple stakeholders in decision making
Second, strategic management includes multiple stakeholders in decision making.
Stakeholders are those individuals, groups, and organizations that have a stake in the success of the organization, including owners (shareholders in a publicly held corporation), employees, customers, suppliers, the community at large, and so on. (We’ll discuss this in more detail later in this chapter.) Managers will not be successful if they focus on a single stakeholder.
For example, if the overwhelming emphasis is on generating profits for the owners, employees may become alienated,”
the four key attributes of strategic management - 3. Incorporates short-term and long-term perspectives
Third, strategic management requires incorporating both short-term and long-term perspectives.
Peter Senge, a leading strategic management author, has referred to this need as a “creative tension.” That is, managers must maintain both a vision for the future of the organization and a focus on its present operating needs. However, financial markets can exert significant pressures on executives to meet short-term performance targets.
Studies have shown that corporate leaders often take a short-term approach to the detriment of creating long-term shareholder value.”
the four key attributes of strategic management - 4. Recognizes trade-offs between efficiency and effectiveness
Fourth, strategic management involves the recognition of trade-offs between effectiveness and efficiency.
Some authors have referred to this as the difference between “doing the right thing” (effectiveness) and “doing things right” (efficiency).
While managers must allocate and use resources wisely, they must still direct their efforts toward the attainment of overall organizational objectives.
As noted by Meg Whitman, Hewlett-Packard’s former CEO, “Less than perfect strategy execution against the right strategy will probably work. A 100 percent execution against the wrong strategy won’t
digital technologies
Digital technologies can also impact the trade-offs between effectiveness and efficiency. When companies use digital technologies to digitize existing business processes, efficiency is improved.
For example, artificial intelligence may be used to automate repetitive administrative tasks such as data entry. In contrast, when companies use digital technologies to become more digital, they often deliver new digital offerings
Three questions that many leaders view as “either/or” choices - 1. Do we manage for today or for tomorrow?
Innovation paradox!!!!
“Do we manage for today or for tomorrow? A firm’s long-term survival requires taking risks and learning from failure in the pursuit of new products and services. However, companies also need consistency in their products and services. This depicts the tension between existing products and new ones, stability and change. This is the innovation paradox.
For example, in the late 1990s, IBM’s senior leaders saw the internet wave and felt the need to harness the new technology. However, the firm also needed to sustain its traditional strength in client-server markets.
Three questions that many leaders view as “either/or” choices - 2. Do we stick to boundaries or cross them?
Globalization paradox!!!
Do we stick to boundaries or cross them? Global supply chains can be very effective, but they may also lack flexibility. New ideas can emerge from innovation activities that are dispersed throughout the world. However, not having all the talent and brains in one location can be costly. This is the tension between global connectedness and local needs, the globalization paradox.”
Three questions that many leaders view as “either/or” choices - 3. Whom do we focus on, shareholders or stakeholders?
Obligation paradox
Whom do we focus on, shareholders or stakeholders? Clearly, companies exist to create value. But managers are often faced with the choice between maximizing shareholder gains while trying to create benefits for a wide range of stakeholders—employees, customers, society, and so on. However, being socially responsible may bring down a firm’s share price, and prioritizing employees may conflict with short-term shareholders’ or customers’ needs. This is the obligation paradox.
Paul Polman, Unilever’s former CEO, launched the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan in 2010. The goal was to double the size of the business over 10 years, improve the health and well-being of more than a billion people, and cut the firm’s environmental impact in half
The 3 paradoxes of leader’s either/or choices
- Innovation paradox
This depicts the tension between existing products and new ones, stability and change - Obligation paradox
However, being socially responsible may bring down a firm’s share price, and prioritizing employees may conflict with short-term shareholders’ or customers’ needs - Globalization paradox
New ideas can emerge from innovation activities that are dispersed throughout the world. However, not having all the talent and brains in one location can be costly.
ambidexterity
Some authors have developed the concept of ambidexterity (similar to the aforementioned innovation paradox), which refers to a manager’s challenge to both align resources to take advantage of existing product markets and proactively explore new opportunities
paradoxes possible:
innovation
obligation
globalization