Chapter 5/6/7 Flashcards
Differences between a team and a group
Team - Limited size - Selection is crucial - Leadership is shared or rotating - Mutual knowledge - Roles are spread - Dynamic interaction Group - Usually bigger size - Selection is immaterial - Leadership is solo - Focus on leader - Convergence conformism - The groups which you belong provide you with shared goals, a sense of identity and meet your social needs - Can also constrain thinking, limit behaviour and restrict your freedom of expression
Hawthorne studies
- Early example of scientific study of groups in organisations
- Initiated as a study into the effects of environmental lighting on productivity
Four key Hawthorne studies
- Illumination experiments
- Relay assembly test room experiments
- The interviewing programme
- The bank wiring observation room experiments
Illumination experiments
- Tested how different levels of light impacted productivity
- No clear correlation was found between lighting and output
Relay I
- Assessed the impact of rest periods on productivity
- Also tested fatigue and monotony thesis
- No clear correlation between rest periods and output, or fatigue and output
Relay II
- Tested effects of wage incentive on output
- No notable increase in output from wage incentive but not sustained
Mica splitting experiment
- Duplicated relay assembly room but without wage incentive
- Same pattern for first year then declined. Output more to do with psychological issues than wage incentives
Interview program
- Link between morale and supervision, improvements in employee-supervisor relations and the attitude of staff
- Workers often have obsessive and irrational views. Social groups have powerful influence over the actions of individuals.
Bank writing observation
- The role of the group in determining output
- The informal group is key to impacting behaviour
Experiments 3 and 4 significant findings
- Lighting and fatigue not significant; next assumption pay
- Tried pay incentives; did not seem to be a factor
- Instead became a ‘special group’
- Anxieties of job losses impacted output
- Morale and supervisory relations considered vital
- Overall discovered the importance of the social side of the organization
Interview programme significant findings
- Revealed workers restricting output
- Focus on one group
- They gave nicknames to those who worked too hard
Identification of group norms
- You should not turn out too much work
- You should not turn out too little work
- You should not tell a supervisor anything that might get a colleague into trouble
- You should not attempt to maintain social distance or act officiously
Key findings from Hawthorne studies
- Business organization is a social system
- Employees satisfactions and dissatisfactions impact productivity
- Employees are more than machines
- Want to use their own initiative
- Introduced a new way to consider management
- Soft skills; informal dynamics of the group
- Challenges of getting people to work together
Differences between rational and human relations approach
Taylor scientific management
- Employees economically motivated
- Mechanical fix to problems
- Micro manage
- Increase output through individualisation
- Workers are replaceable
Mayo hawthorne
- Employees socially motivated
- Social approach to problems
- Work collaboratively towards common outcomes
- Increase output through collective collaboration
- Employee satisfaction increases productivity
Power of the informal organisation
- The social organisation may have more power than managerial influence
- It has social control over work habits and attitudes of the individual worker
- Major factor in the groups productivity
- Belonging to the group
- Managers role in changing group norms
- Social relations a resource for managers
Factors contributing to group cohesiveness and performance
Membership - Size of group - Compatibility - Permanence of group members Work environment - Nature of the task - Physical settings - Communications - Technology Organisational - Management and leadership - Hr policies and procedures - Success - External threat Group development and maturity - Forming - Storming - Norming - Performing - Adjourning
Tuckmans five stages of group development
Forming
- Team acquaints and establishes ground rules. Formalities are preserved and members are treated as strangers
Storming
- Members start to communicate their feelings but still view themselves as individuals rather than part of the team. They resist control by group leaders and show hostility
Norming
- People feel part of the team and realise that they can achieve work if they accept other viewpoints
Performing
- The team works in an open and trusting atmosphere where flexibility is the key and hierarchy is of little importance
Adjourning
- The team conducts an assessment of the year and implements a plan for transitioning roles and recognising members contributions
Consequences of group cohesion
- Group success
- Member satisfaction
- Increased group influence over members
- Cooperative behaviour between individuals
- Greater conformity by members
- Members evaluations become distorted
- Increased interaction between members
- Productivity high or low
Groups usually do:
- Increase resources
- Increase motivation
- Increase creativity, correct errors, resolve ambiguity
Decision making in groups
- A diverse group can produce better decisions
- Gain variety of perspectives and insights
- Challenges, group conflict and rivalry
- Conjunctive tasks require everyone to contribute, group only as good as least effective member
- Variety decision making models from votes to consensus based decisions
Why groups might be worse than individuals
- Group member characteristics
- Group size
- Conformity
- Social loafing
- Inequity based losses
- Production blocking
- Evaluation apprehension
- Cognitive inertia
- Biased information pooling
- Confirmation bias
Group cohesion; drawback 1 group polarization
- Individuals start by taking a moderate stance on an issue, and having discussed it, end up taking a more extreme stance (riskier or more conservative position)
- Reasons include; informational influence (information shared), normative influence (group pressure).
Group cohesion drawback 2 groupthink
- Phenomenon in which the norm for consensus overrides the realistic appraisal of alternative courses of action. In particular, Janis studied disastrous policy decisions
Characteristics of groupthink
Antecedent conditions - Time pressure and stress - High cohesiveness and social identity - Isolation from other sources of information - Directive authoritative leadership Symptoms of groupthink - Pressure towards uniformity - Poor information search and evaluation - Over estimation of the group, its power and morality - Closed mindedness