Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Civics > Chapter 5 > Flashcards

Chapter 5 Flashcards

1
Q

1st Amendment

A
  • Right to protest
    -Freedom of the press
  • Freedom of religion
  • Freedom of petition
  • Freedom of speech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2nd Amendment

A
  • “Well regulated militia”
  • Founding fathers were concerned with self defense and militia service
  • Ongoing issue today between gun rights and gun control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3rd Amendment

A
  • No quartering troops in private homes
  • Set precedent for the right to privacy and reflected concerns about gov’t overreach and individual rights
  • Under marital law, this amendment would not apply
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4th Amendment

A
  • No unreasonable search or seizures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

5th Amendment

A
  • Self inciminination: can’t be forced to testify against urself
  • Due process: Right 2 fair treatment in judicial system and wut ur being charged with
  • Double jeapordy: Can’t be charged 2 w/ the same crime
  • Eminent domain: compensation for private property when it is used 4 public use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

6th amendment

A
  • Rights to individuals accused of criminals right to have a
    • speedy trial
    • public trial
    • impartial jury
    • to be informed of charges
    • confront wtness
    • to counsel (you don’t have to speak until u have a lawyer)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

7th amendment

A
  • rights of individuals in civil disputes
  1. Right a Jury trial
  2. Common Law Tradition
  3. No re-examinations of facts
    • ensures jury’s findings r respected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

8th amendment

A
  • Ensures bail is not set higher than necessary for a time or risk level
  • Bans excessive fines
  • Bans cruel and unusual punishment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

9th Amendments

A
  • Protects rights not in constitution
    • citizens have “unenumerated rights” beyond these explicitly mentioned
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

10th Amendment

A
  • Reserves powers to the states and the ppl that are not specifically delegated to the federal gov by the constitution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Modern Applications

A

Used in debates over state Lawson issues like education, health care, and regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

civil liberties

A

basic freedoms that are guaranteed under the Consitution, such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. These rights are protections from governmental intrusion or abuse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Used in debates over state Lawson issues like education, health care, and regulation

A

Modern Applications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

basic freedoms that are guaranteed under the Consitution, such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. These rights are protections from governmental intrusion or abuse.

A

civil liberties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

incorporation

A

the process by which the Supreme Court applies the Bill of Rights to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the process by which the Supreme Court applies the Bill of Rights to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

A

incorporation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

libel

A

publishing false information about someone with intent to cause harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

publishing false information about someone with intent to cause harm

A

libel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

slander

A

Orally spreading false information about someone with intent to cause harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Orally spreading false information about someone with intent to cause harm

A

slander

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

prior restraint

A

an attempt by government to prevent the publication or broadcast of material considered harmful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

an attempt by government to prevent the publication or broadcast of material considered harmful

A

prior restraint

23
Q

self-incrimination

A

statements, usually made under oath, suggesting that the person speaking is guilty of a crime

24
Q

statements, usually made under oath, suggesting that the person speaking is guilty of a crime

A

self-incrimination

25
Q

double jeopardy

A

the prosecution of a person a second time for a crime for which the defendant has already been tried once and found not guilty. Double jeopardy is prohibited under the Fifth Amendment.

26
Q

The Schenck v. US

A

Schneck didn’t want there to be a mandatory draft and sent out leaflets to people to get them to avoid the draft but the court ruled that this was too dangerous of a way to express freedom of speech and ruled against him

27
Q

Marybury vs Madison

A

Marbury v. Madison was a 1803 Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review, which gives the courts the power to declare laws unconstitutional if they violate the Constitution.

28
Q

Barron vs Baltimore

A

Bill of rights applied only to the actions of the fed gov

29
Q

Plessy v Fergueson

A

Court decided racial seg did not violate Equal “Protection Caluse as long as “separate but equal” facilities were provided for all races

30
Q

Abrams v United states

A
  • Russians for socialism created leaflets that the Supreme court said posed a “clear and present danger”
31
Q

Gitlow v New York

A

Group arrested for handing out leaflets calling for an uprising to create a socialist gov

Reversed Abrams v United States and said that the due process clause did extend to first amendment

32
Q

Engel v Titale

A
  • Court banned state sponsored prayer
33
Q

Lemon v Kurtzman

A

ruled that the practice of using public funds to support private religious schools was unconsitutional
- established lemon test to determine if and when gov action violates establishment clause

gov action must have a secular or nonreligious, purpose, neither help nor hurt religion
not result in an excessive entaglement of the government and religion

34
Q

Reynolds vs US

A
  • ruled that laws may interfere with religious practices
35
Q

Minersville School District v. Gobits

A

Mandated children to say pledge of allegience

36
Q

West Virginia State Board of Education v Baronate

A

reversed decision in Minersville School District v. Gobits and said

37
Q

Brandenburg v. Ohio

A

klu clux clan leader was arrested for giving a speech advocating for illegal activities
- does speech present clear and present danger
- will it likely produce an action

(in this case the court did not find it likely the speech would produce action)

38
Q

Texas vs Johnson

A

Court concluded that flag burning is protected symbolic speech

39
Q

Reno v American Civil Liberties Union

A
  • Court decided some offensive speech must be allowed to exist (specifically some forms of porn can exist)
40
Q

Near v Minnesota

A

Leaders tried to stop publication of material they didn’t like

Court ruled These Attempts at prior restraint are unconstitutional

41
Q

Hague v CIO

A

Mayor of New Jersey didn’t grant the Commiteee of industrial Org a permit to assemble because he disliked labor unions. The union took Hague to court.

42
Q

NAACP vs Button

A

CCase concerned NAACPs efforts to encourage African Americans who had suffered from discrimination to take their cases to court, The state of Virginia accused NAACP of breaking a state law by seeking out legal buisness, The purpose of such laws is usually prevent unethical lawyers from launching lawsuits for their own gain.

43
Q

District of Columbia v Heller

A

Court struck downa a law that banned the possession and regisration of hand guns in Washington DC

44
Q

McDonald v City of Chicago

A

individual right to keepp and bear arms set forth in District of Columbia v Heller applied to state gov as well

45
Q

Katz v US

A

Court thought you needed a warrant even when you place recording device to only capture voice

46
Q

Terry v Ohio

A

Gave law enforcement officials greater latitude to search individuals

47
Q

Gideon vs Rainright

A
  • lawyer provided even in cases where death penalty not involved
48
Q

Sheppard v. Maxwell

A
  • press coverage should not be allowed to interfere with a defendant’s right to due process
49
Q

Furman v Georgia

A

made capital punishment applications more strict

50
Q

Gregg v Georgia

A

death penalty consitutional under new laws

51
Q

Griswold v Conneticut

A

Griswold v. Connecticut was a landmark 1965 Supreme Court case that established the right of married couples to privacy and access to contraception:

52
Q

Roe V Wade

A

women’s right to abortion

53
Q

US v Morrison

A

United States v. Morrison invalidated Section 13981 of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) of 1994 that gave victims of gender-motivated violence the right to sue their attackers in federal court. Justice William Rehnquist wrote for the majority and said that the result was controlled by United States v.

Civics (14 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions