Chapter 47 Flashcards
What are the three areas of potential liability to clients?
Breach of contract, negligence, and fraud.
Breach of Contract
Accountants owe a duty to their clients to honor the terms of their contract and to perform the contract within the stated time period
What are the 4 elements of a standard negligence case?
Plaintiffs have to prove all 4:
1. Duty
2. Breach
3. Causation
4. Damages
Accountant’s Duty of Care
- GAAP and GAAS
- Discovering Improprieties
- Audits, Qualified Opinions and Disclaimers
Discovering Improprieties
as an accountant you aren’t required to find every problem – failure to discover doesn’t mean you are always negligent
Defenses to Negligence
Texas is a comparative state. Poke holes in the plaintiff’s proof. Proximate cause (about foreseeable cause).
3 elements of a fraud case:
Plaintiff has to prove:
1. Misrepresentation of material facts (concealment, etc.)
2. With intent to deceive (scienter)
3. Justifiable reliance by the Plaintiff (reasonable person)
Actual Fraud
A professional intentionally misstates a material fact to mislead a client and the client is injured as a result of justifiably relying on the misstated fact
Constructive Fraud
Conduct that is treated as fraud under the law even when there is no proof of intent to defraud, usually because of the existence of a special relationship or fiduciary duty
Under traditional common law accountants were only liable to…
their clients – privity of contract.
Today numerous third parties rely on opinions of accountants and auditors:
Who are these third parties?
Banks, shareholders/investors, creditors, competitors
What are some reasons why accountants should be liable to third parties?
Professionals are more likely to be careful when we know there is liability
How states hold Accountants liable to third parties depends on which of 3 doctrines the state follows:
Ultramares Rule
The Restatement Rule
“Reasonably Foreseeable Users” Rule
Ultramares Rule
traditional rule concerning accountant’s liability to 3rd parties based on lack of privity between accountants and 3rd parties.
Touche is an accounting firm who falsified the net worth of a company owned by Stern. Stern declared bankruptcy. Ultramares Corp had loaned money to stern based on the falsified financial records and so they sue the accounting firm (Touche).
Rule: Court says the accounting firm only owed a duty of care to those persons for whose “primary benefit” the statements are intended. So, ultramares corp loses their lawsuit and recovers nothing – they were NOT a primary beneficiary of the falsified financial statements.
The Restatement Rule
since most of the work done by auditors is intended for use by 3rd parties (not in privity or even near privity), a majority of courts have adopted the Restatement 3rd of Torts rule.
Restatement 3rd of Torts rule:
Accountants are subject to liability for negligence not only to their clients but also to: foreseen or known users of their reports or financial statements… this means foreseen to the auditor when the audit is published.
What rule of third-party liability does Texas follow?
The restatement rule
“Reasonably Foreseeable Users” Rule
only a small, minority of courts follow this and it says: accountants are held liable to any users whose reliance on an accountant’s statements or reports was reasonably foreseeable…..extends liability to people who it ‘might’ harm anything at any point (VERY broad)