Chapter 4: Stop and Frisk Flashcards
__________, __________, and ___________ individuals on a standard less than ___________ ___________, specifically __________ ___________ to believe that some _______ or is _________ to commit a crime has been apart of police department procedures for decades now.
Stopping; interrogating; frisking; probable cause; reasonable suspicion; has; about
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice
Declared that state legislatures of the 50 states should be able to empower local and state law enforcement agencies to conduct stop and frisks without probable cause because of the growing rate of crime.
Many social groups opposed the ____________’s Commission, suggesting _________ and __________ without _________ __________ would lead to ________/________ discrimination, unfair treatment of the __________, etc.
President’s; stop; frisks; probable cause; racial/ethnic; homeless
Law enforcement agencies reasoned that it would be _________ to limit police officers from conducting ________, who believe that a person ______, is _________ to, or has recently __________ the commission of a crime. However, Justice William Douglas said the abandonment of the ___________ _________ standard is a step towards a ____________ path.
unfair; frisks; has; about; complete; probable; totalitarian
Terry v. Ohio, (1968) created a ___________ test standard that allowed seizures to be conducted w/o __________ __________, stating that field interrogations have to be done by police, and that ________ of the seizure conducted is far more ____________ than that of a ____________ ____________, thus the standard of proof need not be as high as probable cause (__________ __________ suffices).
balancing; probable cause; range; narrow; custodial arrest; reasonable suspicion
Terry v. Ohio, (1968), also established the officers are free to _________ individuals for their _______ safety, and the safety of _______, when there are reasonable ___________ to believe the suspect is ___________ and dangerous.
frisk; own; others; grounds; armed
Frisk
When an officer pats down a suspect’s outer clothing.
2 Central Parts to the Terry v. Ohio (1968) Ruling:
The reasonableness clause of the 4th Amendment should no longer be construed to say that seizures taking place __________ of a warrant and probable cause are _________________. The reasonableness clause should be ___________ to say that investigative stop and frisks on _____________ __________ is protected under the 4th Amendment.
Reasonable suspicion standard created in Terry ruling established a ________ _______ between law enforcement’s right to __________ and _________ crime AND preventing physical
____________ on individual citizens.
probable cause; outside; unconstitutional; extended; reasonable suspicion;
balancing test; investigate; prevent; intrusion
Reasonable Suspicion
Standard of proof necessary to investigate crime.
An officer must have an objective factual basis to believe that lead a reasonable person to conclude that a crime has, is, will be committed.
Based on totality of circumstances (no one factor is determinative).
Balancing Test
Established in Terry v. Ohio, (1968)
Balance that was created out of need to allow police officers freedom to investigate crime AGAINST the freedom from intrusion of individual citizens.
Supreme Court reasoned that requiring officers to _________ until they had ___________ _________ to make an arrest would put (the _______ of) _________ at risk.
wait; probable cause; safety; society
A person’s individual freedoms (from unreasonable intrusion) are balanced by requiring law enforcement to meet an ___________ standard for conducting the seizure under __________ ___________.
objective; reasonable suspicion
Remember, the ___________ ____________ NEED NOT be ____________, it need only be _____________.
reasonable suspicion; correct; reasonable
Objective “Reasonable Person” Standard law enforcement must meet in judging whether seizure under reasonable suspicion was warranted (from Terry ruling):
The ___________ facts available to the officer at the moment of the __________ “warrant a man of ____________ _____________ in the belief that the action taken was appropriate.”
objective; seizure; reasonable caution
The determination of reasonable suspicion is on a ________ by _________ basis.
Case by case
Case by Case Determination
The legal facts of each situation are evaluated to determine whether a police officer’s conduct meets a certain legal standard.
Articulable Suspicion
Suspicion raised using clear/articulable facts coupled w/ reasonable inferences,
leading to the conclusion that a crime has been or is about to be committed.
Police officer may not make seizures / stop and frisks based on a “________” or “____________.” This would be a form of ____________ suspicion, and would lead to the evaporation of ______________ protections against __________ search and seizure.
hunch; stereotype; unparticularized; individual; unreasonable
Officer may use field ___________ as a result of being well versed in law enforcement, objective __________, ______________ that a crime has occurred (given the _________ of day, the area/neighborhood, and the__________ and ________ of crime that usually occurs in that area), the __________ of the suspect when stopped (i.e., are they nervous, fidgety, uncooperative) when determining reasonable suspicion to believe crime has/is about to be committed.
expertise; facts; probability; time; frequency; type; behavior
Informant
Individual who provides info about criminal activity to law enforcement