Chapter 11: Civil and Criminal Remedies for Constitutional Violations Flashcards
3 Additional Remedies deterring police from constitutional (4th, 5th, 6th Amend.) violations
Civil Remedies
Criminal Remedies
Administrative Remedies
These remedies are aimed at the legal ______________ of officers, not the ____________ of _____________ from trial.
responsibility; exclusion; evidence
Civil Remedies
Suing…
- individual officer
- officer’s supervisor
or
- local govt
…for money damages.
Also, it’s requesting court order that police stop practices that violate constitutional rights.
Criminal Remedies
State & federal officers criminally prosecuted and punished.
Administrative Remedies
Officers may have administrative procedures.
- i.e. fines, suspension, termination, etc.
Dual Sovereignty Doctrine
Exception to “Double Jeopardy.”
both federal and state jurisdiction over punishing criminal offense.
A ________ suit is a _______ action, made primarily to _____________ victim, rather than punish ______________ (person who committed the tort).
civil; tort; compensate; tortfeasor
Police officers and public officials may be sued for _____________ if the victim believes their ______________ rights were violated. Also, in exceptional cases of _____________ abuse, plaintiff may be awarded ______________ damages, to ________ future law enforcement agents from repeating that kind of behavior.
damages; constitutional; intentional; punitive; deter
Two types of Tort Actions that can be taken
- Against State Officers
(State Civil Remedies) - Against Federal Officers
(Federal Civil Remedies)
42 U.S.C. § 1983
state officers may be sued for acting under the color of state law to violate one’s federal or constitutional rights in state or federal court.
Injunctive relief can be requested in court order to halt all unconstitutional police practices depriving people of their rights.
Bivens Legal statute
federal officers may be sued for violation of federal / constitutional rights in federal court.
In state civil remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the burden of proof is on the _____________ to demonstrate their _____________ have been violated.
plaintiff; constitutional
3 Elements of state civil remedies claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
- Color of the Law: police have to have acted under color of state law.
- Constitutional Right: police have to have violated a constitutional right.
- Immunity: police receive qualified immunity, only subject to tort action when they violate “well established constitutional right.”
Color of State Law
Defendant (officer) acting under the authority of state law.
One can be __________ in and act under the ___________ of state law, and still violate one’s constitutional rights.
clothed; authority
Determining whether one is acting under the _________ of ________ law is based on the ____________ of ____________. A judge will ask were the actions of the officer (defendant) in furtherance of their____________ as a police officer or as a ___________ citizen. Some judges will look at, for example an off-duty officer _______________ as a security guard, whether during their service as a security guard they used their state-licensed police firearms.
color; state; totality; circumstances; responsibilities; private; moonlighting
For a state civil remedy to work, there must be a violation of a “well ___________ ___________ right.” Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff can claim their ___th amendment right against unlawful __________, and unreasonable _________ and _________ was violated. They may also claim that ______________ force was exercised during arrest (seizure of ___________). Claims to violation of the ____th Amendment against ____________ _____________ and claims of violation of ____th amendment right to ________ _________may also be made. All the time, prisoners make claims, under § 1983, of violation of ____th amendment right against ___________ and __________ punishment.
established constitutional; 4th; arrest; search; seizure; unreasonable; persons; 5th; self incrimination; 6th; legal counsel; 8th; cruel; unusual
Liability under § 1983 may be imposed on an ____________ officer, the officer’s _____________ officer, or public _________ officials (i.e. the mayor) for _____________ of __________ abuse.
individual; commanding; city; pattern; police
This right under § 1983 to impose ___________ liability on ______________ officers establishes an “____________ _________” between the supervising officer’s actions and the lower-ranked police ____________.
This “__________ __________” was established in Shaw v. Stroud, (1994), where supervising officer C.I. was held accountable for the ___________ forced exercised by Officer Alfred Morris. Court of Appeals ruled Sergeant C.I.’s __________ about Officer Morris’ regular disregard for _____________ use of force and didn’t do anything about it. It’s because of this negligence that led to the ______________ shooting and killing of the suspect during an arrest.
individual; supervising; “affirmative link”; misconduct
“affirmative link”; excessive; negligence; appropriate; foreseeable
Absolute Immunity
Applied to prosecutors, judges, juries, and witnesses
Full immunity from being sued under § 1983.
To ensure that civil proceedings function smoothly.
Qualified Immunity
state officers / public officials are subject to suits under § 1983, ONLY WHEN they violate “well established” federal constitutional right / federal statute.
Test to establish qualified immunity is whether a ______________ officer would conclude that a certain act is _______________.
reasonable; unlawful