Chapter 4: Negligence Flashcards
4 Elements of Negligence
Existence of Duty to Care
Breach of Duty
Injury resulting from the breach
Proximate cause of the injury by the breach
Types of Negligence
intentional and unintentional
Types of Liability
Strict and conditional
The person committing the tort
Tortfeasor
Tort Definition
An intentional or unintentional injury (other than a breach of contract) to the victim's body mind property pocketbook
Reasonable Person Test
what would a careful, thoughtful person in the same circumstance have done?
not mentally ill or children
Purpose of Tort Law 6
Specifically to restore the injured party to the position he or she was in before the injury
regulation deterrence compensation dispute resolution education prevention
Strict Liability
A defendant is automatically liable even though no injury has occurred
Intentional Torts
Assault (threat of serious unwanted touching)
Battery (act of unwanted touching)
Trespass
Conversion- a person w/o authority wrongfully takes, retains or disposes of the personal property of another
False imprisionment
Intentional infliction of mental suffering
deceit (fraudulently misleading another)
intentional interference with a contract (urging someone to breach a binding contract)
deceit
Burden of Proof
Civil 51%
Criminal 98%
Defences to Intentional Torts (7)
Consent Self Defence Defence of Property Defence of a 3rd person Necessity Legal Authority Lack of intention
Negligence (Unintentional Torts)
A defendant will be liable for a reasonably foreseeable consequence of their actions
51% probable consequence of an act
Thin Skull Rule
a tortfeasor who can reasonably forsee some injury as a consequence of their conduct may be liable for more serious consequences
The thing speaks for itself
res ipsa loquitur
Res ipsa loquitur
the thing speaks for itself
if a plantiff establishes that the injury could not have happened but for some negligence, then the thing speaks for itself
caused by misadventure not normally occurring w/o negligence
the thing causing the injury was w/in the defendants control
the plaintiff did nothing to provoke the accident
the plaintiff had no prior knowledge of the danger