Chapter 4 Informal fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

Ad hominem fallacy

A

Against the Person: 3 forms - abusive adhominem, circumstantial ad hom, Tu quoque

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Abusive ad hom

A

direct personal attack

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Circumstantial ad hominem

A

discredit by calling attention to the circumstances or situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tu quoque

A

charges with hypocrisy or inconsistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Straw Man Fallacy

A

Premise: Misrepresentation of the view is false.
Conclusion: The view itself is false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Appeal to Force (ad baculum)

A

Premise: You can avoid harm by accepting this statement.
Conclusion: This statement is true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Appeal to the People (ad populum)

A

Premise: You will be accepted if you believe this statement.
Conclusion: This statement is true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Appeal to Pity (ad misericordiam)

A

Premise: You have reason to pity this person.
Conclusion: You should do X for said person though X is not called for logically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Appeal to Ignorance (ad ignorantiam)

A

Premise: This statement has not been proven true (or false).
Conclusion: This statement is false (true).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Equivocation

A

Premise: Contain key word (phrase) that is ambiguous.
Conclusion: Reached illogically by trading on the ambiguity of key word.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Amphiboly

A

Premise: Contains faulty sentence ambiguous due to structure (grammar).
Conclusion: Reached illogically by trading on structural ambiguity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Composition

A

Premise: Parts (or members) have attribute X.
Conclusion: The whole (or group) has attribute X.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Division

A

Premise: The whole (or group) has attribute X.
Conclusion: The parts (or members) have attribute X.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Begging the question (petitio principii)

A

Assuming point to be proved. Premises similar to content of conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

False Dilemma

A

Using premise that unjustifiably reduces the number of alternatives to be considered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Appeal to Unreliable Authority (ad verecundiam)

A

Appealing to authority when reliability to authority reasonably in doubt.

17
Q

False Cause Fallacy

A

Illegitimately assuming on possible phenomenon is cause without reason to exclude other causes.

18
Q

Fallacy of Complex Question

A

Asking question that illegitimately presupposes some conclusion alluded to in the question.