Chapter 4 Informal fallacies Flashcards
Ad hominem fallacy
Against the Person: 3 forms - abusive adhominem, circumstantial ad hom, Tu quoque
Abusive ad hom
direct personal attack
Circumstantial ad hominem
discredit by calling attention to the circumstances or situation
Tu quoque
charges with hypocrisy or inconsistency
Straw Man Fallacy
Premise: Misrepresentation of the view is false.
Conclusion: The view itself is false.
Appeal to Force (ad baculum)
Premise: You can avoid harm by accepting this statement.
Conclusion: This statement is true.
Appeal to the People (ad populum)
Premise: You will be accepted if you believe this statement.
Conclusion: This statement is true.
Appeal to Pity (ad misericordiam)
Premise: You have reason to pity this person.
Conclusion: You should do X for said person though X is not called for logically.
Appeal to Ignorance (ad ignorantiam)
Premise: This statement has not been proven true (or false).
Conclusion: This statement is false (true).
Equivocation
Premise: Contain key word (phrase) that is ambiguous.
Conclusion: Reached illogically by trading on the ambiguity of key word.
Amphiboly
Premise: Contains faulty sentence ambiguous due to structure (grammar).
Conclusion: Reached illogically by trading on structural ambiguity.
Composition
Premise: Parts (or members) have attribute X.
Conclusion: The whole (or group) has attribute X.
Division
Premise: The whole (or group) has attribute X.
Conclusion: The parts (or members) have attribute X.
Begging the question (petitio principii)
Assuming point to be proved. Premises similar to content of conclusion.
False Dilemma
Using premise that unjustifiably reduces the number of alternatives to be considered.