Chapter 4: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Flashcards

1
Q

What are Civil Liberties?

A

Fundamental individual rights of a free society like freedom of speech and the right to a jury trial, protected under the United States Bill of Rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

_______ ________ are questions of whether members of different groups are treated equally by the government and private parties, while ______ __________ are individual rights, such as freedom of speech and press.

A

Civil Rights; civil liberties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the Bill of Rights in the Constitution?

A

The first 10 amendments of the constitution that provide a set of rights that the federal government is obligated to protect such as freedom of speech and religion and due process protections for persons accused of a crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What type of government did the Bill of Rights originally only apply to?

A

The federal government, the state governments didn’t have to follow it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The clase of the constitution (included in 14th amendment) that has been used by the judiciary to apply the bill of rights protections to the actions of state governments is?

A

The due Process clause - stated that no state would deprive anyone of life, liberty, property without due process of law, initially ignored by the supreme court though

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the Supreme court rule in the Gitlow v. New York case?

A

That states didn’t have total control over what their residents could legally say

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was so significant about the Gitlow v. New York ruling stating that states didn’t have total control over what residents could legally say?

A

A fundamental shift in consitutional doctrine. Court concluded that a right protected by the bill of rights from action by federal government was now also protected from the actions by state governments, was applied to other 1st amendments rights shortly after.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the doctrine of selective incorporation?

A

The use of the 14th amendment to apply selected provisions of the bill of rights to the states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How was the doctrine of selective incorporation applied to the Mapp v. Ohio case?

A

Dollree Mapp was wrongfully arrested and searched, upon which incriminating photos were found. Because of the unconstitutional police actions, her conviction was overturned by the supreme court, where the 14th amendment was cited on unreasonable searches and seizures, and the evidence gathered couldn’t be used to obtain a conviction in state courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When did the Supreme court finally rule that defendants in state criminal proceedings must be provided a lawyer in felony cases if they can’t afford one?

A

1960s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

True or False?

Selective incorporation through the 14th amendment’s due process is important because state and local governments have the most responsibility for maintaining public order and safety and are the most likely to act in ways that infringe on people’s rights.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What freedom does the 1st amendment provide?

A

The freedom of expression - the rights of individual american’s to communicate ideas of their choosing such as freedom of conscience, speech, press, assembly, and petition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What forms of speech are not protected by the first amendment?

Examples?

A

Some forms of commercial speech as well as some forms of sexual expressionion - pharmaceutical companies in public advertising are required by law to disclose the harmful side effects of drugs, child pornography

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What act was passed in which Congress ignored the first amendment?

What did the Act do and who opposed it?

A

The Sedition act of 1798

Made it a crime to print newsparper stories critical of the president or other top national officials; Thomas Jefferson opposed it and after replacing John Adams as president in 1801, pardoned everyone convicted under it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In what circumstances can free expression be denied?

A

When it endangers national security, wrongly damages someone elses reputation of others, deprives others of their basic rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the first amendment’s freedom of speech part say you can’t say?

A

Anything obscene, slanderous, or has high probability of inciting others to make imminent lawless choices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Does the 1st amendment’s freedom of religion say you can’t believe what you like but you are protected from having religious beliefs forced on you?

A

No, it says that you are free to believe what you would like, and you are protected from having religious beliefs of others imposed on you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

In the 1st amendment’s freedom of assembly part, what can government regulate?

A

While free to assembly, government may regulate time and place for public convenience and safety reasons as long as it’s applied evenhandedly to all groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

For the first amendment’s freedom of press, in what circumstances does it say you are free to write or publich almost anything?

A

You are free to do so except when it’s obscene, libels another person, seriously endangers military action or national security, of has a high probability of inciting others to take imminent lawless action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What was one of the first restrictions to the freedom of speech in the U.S in 1917 which prohibited forms of dissent that could harm the nation’s effort in World war 1?

A

The 1917 Espionage Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What legislation became the subject of the 1st supreme court free-expression ruling in Schenck v. United States (1919)?

A

The 1917 Espionage act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What were the defendents convictions that were upheld by the supreme court in the Schenck v. United States?

A

The defendants were convicted of distributing leaflets urging draft-age men to refuse induction into the military service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Which Justice in the Schenck v. United States case wrote for a unanimous court upholding the constitutionality of the Espionage act?

A

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes - argued that not even the first amendment would permit a person to inflict conflict or panic in the name of pree speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What constitutional standard did the Schenck v. United States case establish despite the unholding of the Espionage act which limited free expression?

A

The clear and present danger test: a test devised by the supreme court in 1919 to define the limis of free speech in the context of national security, stating that government couldn’t abridge political expression unless it presented clear and present danger to the nation’s security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What defining case marked the actions of the Supreme court protecting speech from the actions of the states?

A

Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Who was Clarence Brandenburg in the Brandenberg v. Ohio case 1969 and what was he convicted of?

A

Brandenburg was convicted of stating at a Ku Klux Klan rally that revenge might be taken if the national government continued to suppress the white caucasian race and convicted under an ohio law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What did the supreme court rule in the Brandenburg v. Ohio case (1969)?

A

The supreme court overturned Brandenburg’s conviction, stating that a state couldn’t prohibit speech unless it meets the requirements of a two part test - directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and likely to produce such action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is imminent lawless action?

A

A legal test and barrier on any government attempting to restrict speech unless the advocacy is aimed at producing, and likely to produce imminent lawless action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

True or False?

In a unaminous 1992 opinion, the court struck down a St. Paul, Minnesota, ordinance making it a crime to engage in speech likely to arouse “anger or alarm” on the basis of “race, color, creed, religion or gender.” The Court said that the First amendment prohibits government from “silencing speech on the basis of its content.” (This protection of hate speech doesn’t apply to hate crimes like assault, motivated by racial or other prejudice.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How did the Supreme court vote in the Wisconsin law that allowed lengthier sentences for hate crimes?

A

In the unanimous 1993 opinion, the court said that the law wasn’t aimed at free speech and instead aimed at “conduct unprotected by the first amendment.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Who was Matthew Snyder in the Snyder v. Phelps case (2011) and who protested against him?

What did the supreme court rule after Snyder’s father sued WBC for emotional distress and was awarded 5 million in a federal trial?

A

Matthew Snyder was a U.S. marine killed in Iraq, who was protested at his funeral by the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) because he was a gay soldier three blocks away from the Memorial service.

The Supreme court to an 8-1 ruling overturned the award, stating that while hurtful, the WBC’s protest was protected under the first amendment in the constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is symbolic speech?

Example?

A

Actions for the purpose of expressing a political opinion

Ex: Waving or burning of a flag

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What was the supreme court ruling towards Texas’s argument stating that flag burning was in every instance a danger to public safety in response to Gregory Lee Johnson setting a flag on fire outside the hall in Dallas where the 1984 Republican National Convention was being held?

A

The supreme court rejected texas’s argument, stating that government can’t prohibit expression simply because someone finds it effensive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

In general, the Supreme Court has held that government regulation of the __________ of a message is unconstitutional.

How was Texas regulating the content of the message of Gregory Lee Johnson burning the flag?

A

content

Texas was regulating the content of the message through the contempt for the flag and the principles it represents. Texas couldn’t have been regulating because the texas government’s method for disposing worn out flags is to burn it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What was a key case in 1977 regarding the freedom of assembly of American Nazi Party in Skokie, Illinois?

A

The US supreme court in 1977 upheld a lower-court ruling against local ordinances trying to prevent a parade there by a American Nazi Party in Skokie, Illinois which had large Jewish population including Nazi survivers.

Supreme court stated that it had the right to free assembly, and that took precedence over the possibility of undesirable consequences of that event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

In terms of freedom of speech and assembly, can the Court regulate time, place, and conditions of public assembly, provided regulations are reasonable and applied fairly to all groups no matter the issue?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What case showed the strenth of strong judicial protection for freedom of press in 1971?

What were the Pentagon Papers?

What was the government prohibition of speech or publication before occuring that was brought up in the New York Times Co. v. United States case that also is the basis of the current doctrine of press freedom? What is an exception to this?

A

New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) - publicated the “pentagon papers” which were secret gov’t documents revealing officials deceived the public about aspects of the vietnam war, and the supreme court stated they couldn’t be blocked by government, which claimed that publication would harm the war effort.

The Prior Restraint - wartime reporting; in some circumstances, government can censor news reprots that contain information that could compromise a mimlitary operation or risk the lives of american troops

38
Q

False information harmful to a person’s reputation is published (________) or spoken (__________) allows the injured party to sue for damages.

A

Libel; slander

39
Q

In what court case did the Supreme court overrule an alabama state court that found the New York Times guilty of libel for publishing an advertisement that claimed that alabama officials mistreated civil rights activists, and even though some of the allegations were true, the Supreme court backed the times stating that libel needed proof of malice.

What did it show interms of the legal protects of false statements?

A

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) - showed that false statements get considerable legal protection

40
Q

What two clauses are apart of the First Amendment regarding the freedom of religion?

A
  1. The establishment clause

2. The free-exercise clause

41
Q

What does the establishment clause mean?

A

The first amendment provision stating that government can’t favor one religion over another or favor religion over no religion and prohibiting congress from passing laws respecting the establishment of religion.

42
Q

True or False?

Public schools can impose particular religious beliefs on children.

A

False - prohibited from imposing religious beliefs on children

43
Q

What is the difference between the wall-of-separation doctrine and the accommodation doctrine?

A

Wall-of-separation doctrine - strict separation of church and state when erecting religious statues and displays in public court houses

Accommodation doctrine - allows government to aid religious activity if no preference is shown toward a particular religion and if the assistance is of a nonreligious nature

44
Q

When was the wall-of-separation and accommodation doctrine - usually applied with a three-point test known as the Lemon test - applied and articulated?

What happened in this case?

A

In the Lemon v. Kurtzman case (1971) - The court held that state funding of salaries of religious school teachers failed the lemon test, saying that it involved an excess amount of government entanglement with religion because an instructor, even in math and science classes, could teach religion

45
Q

What is the Lemon test?

What clause is it testing whether religious law is valid?

When does an argument pass the lemon test?

A

A three part test to determine whether a law relating to religion is valid under the religious establishment clause.

When the law has a secure purpose, serves neither to advance nor inhibit religion, and avoids excessive government entanglement with religion

46
Q

What is the Free-exercise clause?

A

A first amendment provision that prohibits the government from interfering with the practice of religion; americans are free to hold any religious belief of their choosing.

47
Q

When can government interfere with the exercise of religion, who allows government to do this?

A

The supreme court allows government to interfere with exercise of religion when the exercise of religious beliefs conflict with valid laws in place.

48
Q

Read the free-exercise decision Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores in 2014 and the 2018 ruling Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

A

Chapter 4

49
Q

What right the second amendment of the Constitution protect in terms of civilians and limit in terms of government?

A

The right of people to keep and bear arms unconnected to service in a militia, and to use the arm for lawful purposes such as self-defense, and the ability for states to form militia’s necessary for the state security.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

50
Q

What does the second amendment prevent the government from doing?

A

Abolishing state militia’s like the National Guard

51
Q

In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), who did the court rule with regarding The district of colombia’s law that banned handgun possession, but not rifles or shotguns within the district’s boundaries?

What government did the Heller ruling apply to?

A

Sided with Heller, against the District of columbia in a 5-4 majority rule

Only applied to the federal government

52
Q

When did the Heller ruling apply to the state and local governments?

A

After the McDonald v. Chicago case in 2010, where through selective incorporation, applied the same standard to state and local governments.

53
Q

What wasn’t prohibited in the Heller and Chicago cases in terms of gun ownership?

A

There weren’t bans on gun ownership for former felons

54
Q

When was the right to privacy added to the bill of rights?

What case was it derived from?

A

1965

Griswold v. Connecticut - challenging a state law prohibiting the use of condoms and other birth control devices, even with married couples - supreme court struck down the law using the underlying right of privace

55
Q

What type of right is the right to privacy?

A

The right implied by freedoms in the bill of rights that granted individuals a degree of personal privacy upon which government couldn’t lawfully intrude, gives individuals a level of gree choice in areas like reproduction and intimate relations

56
Q

What two major areas has the right of privacy been invoked in?

A
  1. Abortion rights for women

2. Consensual relations among same-sex couples

57
Q

What was so significant about the Roe v. Wade case (1973) regarding the right to privacy in a certain controversial area?

A

The supreme court ruled, giving women full freedom to choose abortion during the first three months of pregnancy

58
Q

Does the US have a constitutional amendment that bans abortion?

A

No

59
Q

What Louisiana law did the Supreme court strike down in 2020 in the June Medical services v. Russo case?

A

The louisiana law states that abortion providers would have to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the clinic, which would have caused 2 of the 3 state abortion clinics to close.

Supreme court ruled in a 5-4 decision that it imposed undue burden on women seeking an abortion

60
Q

When was the same-sex consensual sexual relations right of privacy finally enacted?

A

Lawrence v. Texas in 2003 with a 6 - 3 court ruling, supreme court reversed its earlier position and stated that sodomy laws violated the right of privacy implied by the grant of liberty in the 14th amendment’s due process clause

61
Q

What clause and amendment was the right to privacy implied in?

A

Implied in the Grant of liberty in the fourteenth amendment’s due process clause

62
Q

When did the supreme court legalize same sex marriage?

A

2015

63
Q

What is due process?

A

Legal protections that have been established to preserve the rights of individuals

64
Q

The most significant of due process protections is ______________ ___ ________.

What does it mean?

A

Procedural due process - the constitutional requirement that government must follow proper legal procedueres before a person can be legitimately punished for an alleged offense.

65
Q

Which amendments offer procedural safeguards designed to protect a person from wrongful arrest, conviction and punishment?

A

4th, 5th, 6th, 8th amendments include specific procedural protections of the accused

14 and 15 amendments generally say that no person can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law

66
Q

What do the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th amendments protect the accused from in terms of due process protections?

A

4th: protected from unreasonable search and seizure, forfeit right if you knowingly waive it; protected from arrest unless authorities have probable cause to believe that you have committed a crime
5th: protected from self-incrimination - right to remain silent and protected against coercion by law enforcement officials; double jeopardy - can’t be tried twice for the same crime if the first trial results in acquittal; due process - can’t be deprived of life, liberty, or property without proper legal proceedings
6th: right to counsel - to be represented by attorney and can demand to speak first with attorney before responding to questions from law enforecement officials; right to be arraigned promptly, informed of charges, confront witnesses, and to have speedy and open trial by impartial jury
8th: protected against excessive bail or fines; protected from cruel and unusual punishment - this provision doesn’t protect from death penalty or long prison term for minor offense

67
Q

What two significant court cases delivered a landmark ruling unanimously regarding California and Massachusetts?

What were the similarities of both cases?

What was Riley’s verdict?

A

Riley v. California

United States v. Wurie

Both involved the police searching the suspects phone without a warrant and found information incriminating the suspect - supreme court noted that while upon making an arrest, police can normally search a suspect and seize relevant physical items, cell phones and electronic devices were a different ball game because they contain large amounts of personal information.

Riley, after appealing his conviction, was backed by the supreme court in a 9-0 ruling, confirming that police had violated his right to protection against unreasonable search and seizure - warrant is required most of the time to search an electronic device

68
Q

When does the supreme court allow warrantless searches?

A

School administrators latitude in searching students for drugs and weapons.
Police roadblocks to check drivers for signs of intoxication are legal as long as the action is systematic and not arbitrary
Police prohibits police roadblocks to check for drugs - serve a general law enforcement purpose rather than one specific to highway safety and thereby violate the 4 amendment’s requirement that police must have suspicion of wrongdoing before they can search an individuals auto

69
Q

What was the significance of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) in terms of the 5th amendment?

What procedure did this lead to?

A

Ernesto Miranda confessed to kidnapping and rape during police questioning, however, because police didn’t inform him of his right to remain silent and have legal assistance as per the 5th amendment, the supreme court overturned his conviction.

The Miranda warning - police are required by law to inform a suspect of their rights when bringing them into custody and afterwards.

70
Q

What 5 warnings do suspects get when being brought into custody as per the Miranda ruling?

A
  1. You have the right to remain silent
  2. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law
  3. You have the right to talk to a lawyer and have him present with you while you are being questioned
  4. If you cannot afford to hire a lawyer. One will be appointed to represent you before any questioning if you wish
  5. You can decide at any time to exercise these rights and not answer any questions or make any statements

Waiver:
Do you understand each of these rights I have explained to you?
Having these rights in mind, do you wish to talk to us now?

71
Q

What right is basic to any reasonable notion of justice in a court of law?

A

The right to a fair trial

72
Q

Is the federal government required to use grand juries?

Why or Why Not?

Are states required to use grand juries?

Why or Why Not?

Who does decide whether a suspect is tried if the grand jury isn’t making the decision?

A

Yes, because a person charged with a federal crime can’t be tried unless indicted by a grand jury as per the 5th amendment where the grand jury listens to the prosecution’s evidence and decides whether it’s strong enought to allow the government to try the suspect.

No, because while suspects charged with a federal crime need to be indicted by a grand jury before being tried as per the 5th amendment, this protection doesn’t apply to the 14th amendment, so states aren’t required to use grand juries.

The prosecutor usually decides whether to proceed with the trial.

73
Q

What two cases led to the decision that criminal defendants in federal cases must be provided a lawyer at the government expense if they can’t afford one, and extended the requirement to include state cases a few decades later as per the 6th amendment?

A

Johnson v. Zerbst (1938) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963).

74
Q

Review Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) in your textbook

A

Chapter 4

75
Q

When did the supreme court outlaw the stacking of juries by race?

A

1968

76
Q

True or False?

Criminal defendants have the right to a speedy trial and to confront witnesses against them. At the federal and sometimes state level, criminal defendants have the right to jury trial, which is heard by an impartial jury.

A

True

77
Q

What does the 14th amendment’s equal protection clause require from a jury for serious offenses from the federal and now the state level?

When and what case was this put into place?

A

That there is a unanimous jury.

Ramos v. Louisiana (2020) with a 6 - 3 jury ruling

78
Q

Where group were non-unanimous state juries traced?

A

Back to the rise of the Ku Klux Klan and their efforts to destroy the influence of ethnic, religious and racial minorities

79
Q

What is the exclusionary rule?

A

The legal principle that government isn’t allowed to use evidence that was obtained through unconstitutional means in trial - like illegal search and seizures

80
Q

What case was the exclusionary rule formated from and what was it used to deter?

A

Weeks v. United States (1914) - used to deter police from violating people’s rights

81
Q

Was the exclusionary rule used widely when first formulated?

If not, when and who expanded its use?

A

No, it wasn’t widely used in 1914 even after Weeks v. United States (1914).

It was expanded in 1960’s the liberals that dominated the supreme court expanded the rule to the point where illegally gathered or obtained evidence was almost never admissible.

82
Q

What are a few exceptions to the exclusionary rule brought on after conservatives justices criticized the rule of “coddling criminals” and more conservatives were appointed to the court?

A

The good faith exception - otherwise inadmissible evidence can be used in trial if police honestly believed they were following proper procedures, like obtaining a search warrant that ends up faulty

The inevidable discovery exception - even if incriminating evidence is wrongly obtained, it can be used if it would have inevitably been discovered by lawful means

The plain view exception - evidence found in plain sight is admissible even when the evidence relates to an infraction other than the one for which the individual was stopped, like if a driver is pulled over for speeding and the officer spots illegal drugs on the back seat

83
Q

How many appeals do the federal and all state governments permit?

A

At least one appeal

84
Q

True and False?

Under a law enacted in 1996 to prevent inmates form filing multiple appeals, typically allowed only a single appeal. Exceptions that the supreme court has held that prisoners have the right to have their appeal heard in federal court unless they had deliberately passed the opportunity to first make their appeal in state courts.

A

True

85
Q

What constitutional rights have been applied unevenly regarding police practices?

A

Racial profiling - targeting individuals from minority groups.

Sentencing policies - stiffer penalties since the 1990’s from crime while trying to prevent judges from reducing sentences for nonviolent crimes committed by first time offenders

86
Q

On a per capita basis, which country has the largest prison population in the world?

A
  1. United States
  2. Cuba
  3. Russia
  4. Iran
  5. Mexico
  6. Great Britain
  7. China
  8. France
  9. Canada
  10. Japan
87
Q

True or False:

Sentencing laws that implement early-release programs have been applied regarding the human and financial cost of keeping so many people in prison

A

True

88
Q

Where did the Bush administration hold “enemy combatants” after 9/11?

What were they subject to?

A

Detention facility at the US naval base at Guantanamo bay on the tip of cuba. Afghanistan, Iraq.

Subject to abusive treatment, torture

89
Q

What supreme court decisions were made regarding “enemy combatants” after 9/11 that gave more rights to enemy combatants?

A

2004 - ruled that detainees had the right to challenge their detention in court
2004 - american detainee had the right to be heard in US courts
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006) - tribunals were unlawful because they didn’t provide minimal protections of detainees’ rights, like seeing evidence against them, detainees were protected by both US uniform code of military justice and by the geneva conventions

90
Q

What did the USA Patriod Act give the government after being implemented after 9/11?

A

Gave government additional tools for combating terrorism, such as expanded surveillance power.

91
Q

Who was the whistleblower that exposed the NSA program that collected americans’ phone records as a means of detecting activity that might be terrorist-related by leaking the documents to the press.

A
92
Q

Why was the NSA program ruled unlawful, what did it violate and what was it determined not to have violated?

When was it authorized by congress with limits on it such as phone data be given to telecommunications companies rather than the NSA, with the NSA having to require a warrant for them. How long did

A

DIdn’t violate the 4th amendment against unreasonable search and seizure, but because it wasn’t explicitly authorized by cogress.

2015, then 2018 for a period of 6 years