chapter 4 Flashcards

1
Q

why should you value the environment

A

damage estimates for policy design and the court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

assessing magnitude of damage

A

identifying affected categories
estimating the physical relationship between the pollutant and damages caused to categories
estimating response by the effected parties toward averting/mitigating some portion of the damage
placing a monetary value on the physical damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

total wtp

A

use value + option value + non use value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

use value

A

direct use, even scenic beauty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

passive use value

A

resource is not actually used up in the process of experiencing it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

option value

A

reflect the value people place on a future ability to use the environment
wtp to preserve the option to use in the future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

non use value

A

people are wtp for improving or preserving resources that they will never use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

bequest

A

wtp to ensure it is available for your kids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

existence

A

wtp tp ensure it is available in the absence of any future interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

revealed preference valuation

A

based on actual observable choices that allow resource values to be directly inferred from those choices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

stated preference valuation

A

not directly observable attempt to derive value by using a survey to est wtp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

stated preference direct methods

A

contingent valuation: ask respondents what value they would place on an environmental change or on preserving it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

stated preference indirect methods

A

attribute based: respondents are asked to choose among alternate bundles of goods

contingent ranking: ranking options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

major concerns with stated preference

A

strategic bias: intend to influence outcome
information bias: force to value attributes they have little experience with
starting-point bias: could occur when they have to check off answers from a predetermined range of possibilities
hypothetical bias: biased answer for personal reasons
discrepancy between wtp and wta: wta > wtp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

cvm

A

effective in est. non use and passive value methods but lack the accuracy to estimate use value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

btm

A

estimates for one site to be based upon estimates from other sites or benefits from an earlier time period to provide the foundation for a current estimate

17
Q

revealed preference direct methods

A

market price

18
Q

revealed preference indirect methods

A

travel cost method: infer value of a recreational resource by using info on how much the visitors spent getting to the sit to construct a demand curve for wtp

1) examine number of trips there
2) examine whether people decided to visit a site and which one

hedonic property value: use market price data and then break down the house sales price into its components included house, neighborhood, and environmental characteristics

hedonic wage: workers in high risk environment = higher wages

averting expenditure: potential expenses needed to deal with a problem
amount of money people are wtp to protect themselves from pollution damages

19
Q

gis

A

made up of layers such that many variables can be visualized simultaneously using overlays used fro estimating health impacts and associated with economic values of changes in air pollution runs health impact functions - related change in concentration of pollution with change in health

20
Q

human valuation

A

the economic approach values the change in probability of death resulting from the reduction in environmental risk

21
Q

VSL

A

represents an individuals wtp for small changes in mortality risks
amount individual wtp / reduction in probability