Chapter 4 Flashcards
The conformations existing under a given set of
conditions are usually the ones that are
thermodynamically the
most stable — that is, having the lowest free energy (G).
native protein
Proteins
in any of their functional, folded conformations are often called native proteins
For the vast majority of proteins, a particular structure or small
set of structures is
critical to function. However, in many cases,
parts of proteins lack discernible structure. These protein
segments are intrinsically disordered. In some cases, entire
proteins are intrinsically disordered, yet are fully functional.
stability
Stability is the tendency of a protein to maintain a native
conformation. Native proteins are only marginally stable; the ΔG
separating the folded and unfolded states in typical proteins
under physiological conditions is in the range of only 5 to 65
kJ/mol.
Ionic interactions may b
either stabilizing or destabilizing. We must therefore look
elsewhere to understand why a particular native conformation is
favored
On carefully examining the contribution of weak
interactions to protein stability, we find that
the hydrophobic
effect generally predominates. Pure water contains a network of
hydrogen-bonded H2O molecules. No other molecule has the
hydrogen-bonding potential of water, and the presence of other
molecules in an aqueous solution disrupts the hydrogen bonding
of water
When water surrounds a hydrophobic molecule,
, the
optimal arrangement of hydrogen bonds results in a highly
structured shell, or solvation layer, of water around the molecule
(see Fig. 2-7). The increased order of the water molecules in the
solvation layer correlates with an unfavorable decrease in the
entropy of the water.
Salt bridges, especially those that are partly or entirely
buried,
can thus provide significant stabilization to a protein
structure. This trend explains the increased occurrence of buried
salt bridges in the proteins of thermophilic organisms. Ionic
interactions also limit structural flexibility and confer a
uniqueness to a particular protein structure that the clustering of
nonpolar groups via the hydrophobic effect cannot provide.
Peptide conformation is defined by three dihedral angles
(also
known as torsion angles) called ϕ (phi), ψ (psi), and ω (omega),
reflecting rotation about each of the three repeating bonds in the
peptide backbone.
A dihedral angle is
the angle at the
intersection of two planes.
In the case of peptides, the planes are
defined by bond vectors in the peptide backbone.
Two successive
bond vectors describe a plane. Three successive bond vectors
describe two planes (the central bond vector is common to both;
Fig. 4-2c), and the angle between these two planes is what we
measure to describe peptide conformation.
good stuff on pg 491
kk
A typical protein usually has
one or more stable threedimensional conformations that reflect its function. Some
proteins have segments that are intrinsically disordered but are
nonetheless essential for function
Whereas nonpeptide covalent bonds, particularly disulfide
bonds, can play a role in stabilization of some structures, proteins
are stabilized largely by
multiple weak, noncovalent interactions
and forces
The hydrophobic effect, derived from
the increase in entropy
of the surrounding water when nonpolar molecules or groups are
clustered together, makes the major contribution to stabilizing
the globular form of most soluble proteins.
Hydrogen bonds and ionic interactions are optimized in the
thermodynamically most stable structures.
Van der Waals interactions involve
attractive forces between
molecular dipoles that occur over short distances. Individually
these interactions are weak, but they combine in well-packed
protein structures to provide significant effects and stabilization.
The nature of the covalent bonds in the polypeptide backbone
places constraints on s
n structure. The peptide bond has a partial
double-bond character that keeps the entire six-atom peptide
group in a rigid planar configuration. The N—Cα and Cα—C
bonds can rotate to define the dihedral angles ϕ and ψ,
respectively, although permitted values of ϕ and ψ are limited by
steric clashes and other constraints
key convention on pg 490
kk
can reread pgs 480-490m if u want, i feel like i missed them but am not sure
kk
secondary structure
The term secondary structure refers to any chosen segment of a
polypeptide chain and describes the local spatial arrangement of
its main-chain atoms, without regard to the positioning of its side
chains or its relationship to other segments. A regular secondary
structure occurs when each dihedral angle, ϕ and ψ, remains the
same or nearly the same throughout the segment
The α-helical segments in proteins o
these dihedral angles, and they even vary
somewhat within a single, continuous segment so as to produce
subtle bends or kinks in the helical axis
In summary, five types of constraints affect the stability of an α
helix:
(1) the intrinsic propensity of an amino acid residue to form
an α helix; (2) the interactions between R groups, particularly
those spaced three (or four) residues apart; (3) the bulkiness of
adjacent R groups; (4) the occurrence of Pro and Gly residues; and
(5) interactions between amino acid residues at the ends of the
helical segment and the electric dipole inherent to the α helix.
The tendency of a given segment of a polypeptide chain to
502
form an α helix therefore depends on
the identity and sequence
of amino acid residues within the segment.
, the β conformation.
In 1951, Pauling and Corey predicted a second type of repetitive
structure, the β conformation. This is a more extended
conformation of polypeptide chains, and its structure is again
defined by backbone atoms arranged according to a characteristic
set of dihedral angles (Table 4-1
In the β conformation,
the backbone of the polypeptide chain is extended into a zigzag
rather than helical structure
a β sheet.
The
arrangement of several strands side by side, all in the β
conformation, is called a