Chapter 37: Special Relativity Flashcards
Inertial reference frame
- a reference frame in which NI holds.
- inertial reference frames are either at rest or move with a constant velocity
- any two such inertial refernce frames move at a constant velocity relative to eahc other
non-inertial reference frame
A reference frame which is accelerating either in a linear fashion or rotating about some axis (centripital acceleration)
Event
-An occurrence at a definite instant in time and point in space. By using a reference
frame we can assign space and time coordinates to an event.
For example: A light flashes/a balloon pops/two particles collide at position (x, y, z) and time t.
observer
A (possibly hypothetical) person who performs measurements in a reference frame in which they are stationary. They interpret the results of these measurements intelligently.
Einstein’s Postulates of Relativity: 2
(a) The laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frames. (this is simply an extenmtion to the more general principle of relativity from before)
(b) The speed of light (in vacuum) is the same in all inertial frames, regardless of the motion of the source.
i. e. light travels thorugh empty spoace with a constant velocity c that is independent of the speed of observer or source of light…
thus, acc the MM experiment this theory of special relativity rejects the existance of an ether
state the priciple of relactivity
the basic laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frames
from one reference frame to another, thibngs like forces, mass, length and time does not change, these quantiteis are said to be absolute
since we have the [principle of relativity and since this means that the laws of mechanics do not chnage for differnet inertial refernece frames what does this mean
no one inerital refernce frame is special in any sense
we can conclude that all inertial reference frames are equivalent
when are to events cosnidered to be simultaneous
when they happen at the same time
they may have i=different positions in space as per the def of an event
what is wrong with the galilean transform
it is at best a low speed ( non-relativistic ) approximation of a more general transformation law ( the lorentz transform
it is not compatible with einstein’s second postulate
the relativity of simultaneity
events that occur simultaneously in one frame need not occur simultaneously in other frames.
there is no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ here. “now” simply means different things to different observers
all three ref frmes in our eg (rocket, cart, ground) are equally valid and on the same footing
why does the relativity of simulteiniety not spell trouble for causality, the principle that cause alwyas precedes effect
no
if one event can cause/ in any way influence another evnet then the order of the two will be the same in all frames.
Although the time difference (interval) between the events can be different in different frames
what is time dilation
moving clocks run slower than stationary clocks
what is the formula for the lorentz factor in words and eq
the factor by which time, length, and relativistic mass change for an object while that object is moving.
λ = 1/√1-(v^2/c^2)
why don’t we notice time dilation in classical mechanics where things are large and slow
v^2/c^2 tends to 0
λ = 1/√1-(v^2/c^2) tends to 1
the lorentz factor λ tends to 1 as v tends 0
if we put an atomic clockc ona plane it would indeed measure nanoseconds slower so it does happen in classical terms just we have to ‘‘zoooooom in’’
why do we notice time dilation so much only at relativistic speeds
the lorentz factor λ tends to ∞ as v tends to c