CHAPTER 35: Acute Pain Management Flashcards
Is the most common presenting symptom for patients coming to the ED
Pain (70% to 80%)
Undertreatment of pain
Oligoanalgesia
Ethnicity, gender, age (very young, very old)
Diminished cognitive function
Fear of meds: addiction, side effects
Acceptance of pain as being inevitable
Unwillingness to bother healthcare providers
Patient related barriers to adequate ED pain control (Table 35-1 p. 230)
Is the physiologic response to a noxious stimulus
Pain
Is the expression of pain, it is modified by the complex interaction of cognitive, behavioral, and sociocultural dimension
Suffering
Is considered the gold standard for quantifying the severity of a patient’s pain
Self-reporting
The patient’s subjective reporting of pain, not the healthcare provider’s impression, is the basis for pain assessment and treatment.
Easily localized pain
Somatic pain
Visceral pain
Poorly localized pain
Opioid receptor with significant structural homology
Nociceptin
Opioid receptor produces supraspinal analgesia
Mu-1 (μ1) receptor
Opioid receptor results in euphoria, miosis, respiratory depression, and depressed GI motility
GERM: GI motility depression Euphoria Resp depression Miosis
Mu-2 (μ2) receptor
Opioid receptor produces analgesia and also exerts an antidepressant effect
Delta (δ) receptor
Opioid receptor produces Dysphoria, along with Dissociation, Delirium, and Diuresis
4Ds
Kappa (κ) receptor
TRUE or FALSE?
Opioid receptors are linked to addiction
FALSE
Opioid receptors are NOT linked to addiction, which is much more closely linked to the cannabinoid-1 receptor
TRUE or FALSE?
There’s a weak correlation bet nonverbal signs & px’s report of pain
TRUE
There is a weak correlation between nonverbal signs and the px’s report of pain, so DO NOT rely on these to det the seve of a px’s pain
Quantitate pain severity, guide the selection and administration of an analgesic agent, and reassess the pain response to determine the need for repeated doses or alternative analgesics
Pain scales
Is the preferred pain assessment tool when there are language difficulties or cross-cultural differences because it is the least affected by these factors
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Is the mainstay of acute pain management
Administration of pharmacologic agents
Pain reliever that should be considered for mild to moderate pain or when targeting severe pain originating from smooth muscle spasm such as renal or biliary coli
NSAIDs
In specific instances such as renal and biliary colic, although parenteral NSAIDs may control severe pain, combination therapy with an opioid is usually superior.
Pain Scale method (Table 35-2 p. 230):
Ordered list of pain descriptors (no pain to worst possible pain)
Easy to administer
Adjective rating scale
Pain Scale method (Table 35-2 p. 230):
10-cm linear scale
Measured in millimeters
Visual analog scale (VAS)
Is the minimum clinically significant change noticeable by patients in VAS
13mm
Is the average decrease of change as the minimum acceptable change for pain control
30 mm
Pain Scale method (Table 35-2 p. 230):
Scale of 0 to 10 WITH descriptors
Used in patients with visual, speech, or manual dexterity difficulties by using upheld fingers
Numeric rating scale
Pain Scale method (Table 35-2 p. 230):
Rates pain as:0 = none1 = a little2 = some3 = a lot4 = worst possible
Decrease of 1 point is a large change
5-Point global scale
Pain Scale method (Table 35-2 p. 230):
Sccale of 0 to 10 WITHOUT descriptors
Most commonly used scale
Verbal quantitative scale