Chapter 3 - Macro Policy Flashcards
What is fiscal policy?
Changes in Gov.Spending and taxation to influence AD in an economy
What are the two types of fiscal policy?
Expansionary = Increase AD
Contractionary = Decrease AD
What diagram do we use when talking about fiscal policy?
Keyensian LRAS with AD shifts left or right
What are the 5 different expansionary fiscal policies the Gov could implement? (opposite for contractionary)
1) Reduce marginal rate of income tax for those in lower income tax brackets or increase the income tax free allowance
2) Reduce marginal rate of income tax of rich (highest income tax bands)
3) Reduce level of regressive taxes.
Poor have high marginal propsensity to consume
4) Reduce level of cooporation tax
5) Boost their spending in economy, boosting G. Also multiplier effect increasing incomes and further faciliting rounds of spending
What are the benefits of expansionary fiscal policy? 4
1) Increases in growth. Greater demand -> increased output exhuasting spare capacity -> increase in real GDP -> increase in economic growth
2) Decrease in unemployment -> Labour derived demand
3) Certain types of Gov spending and tax cuts can be quick to impact the economy such as VAT
4) Increases in LRAS
Do any of the expansionary fiscal policies affect LRAS?
1) Reducing cooporation tax = INcrease retained profits for businesses -> easier to finance investment -> increase marginal propensity to invest -> improving quantity and quality of capital stock in economy -> increasing LRAS
2) Gov spending on infrastructure -> education and healthcare improve productivity -> public infrastructure imporves efficiency, improvin quality, lowering costs of production for firms
What are the cons of expansionary fiscal policy? 6
The cons of running a budget deficit, where Gov spending exceeds tax revenue
1) Increased inflation
2) Deterioration of Gov finances
Funding expansionary fiscal policies may mean tax rises in future -> if indirect, regressive the poor suffer -> worsening income inequality -> going agaisnt major macroeconomic objective -> cutting spending problems
3) Ricardian Equivalance problem
If further tax increases are ANTICIPATED -> consumers save gains in disposable income from current tax cuts INSTEAD OF SPENDING -> reducing increases in AD and gains from expansionary fiscal policy
4) If deterioration of Gov finances is severe Where budget deficits and national debts rise to unsustainable levels -> confidance can be lost in the state of the government.
Leads to mass selling of Gov bonds -> lower demand for new issues -> driving up interest rates on Gov debt -> potentially bankrupting Government forcing bailout.
COUNTER TO THIS = increase in AD -> increases in growth -> higher incomes and profits overtime -> increased fiscal intake for Gov in the long run -> paying off colected debts
5) Crowding out of private sector
Where excess government borrowing increases demand for loanable funds in loanable funds market -> pushing up equilibrium interest rates -> more expensive for firms to finance their investments -> reduce investment in economy -> harming SR and LR economic growth
6) Time lags
Some forms of gov spending take a while for the benefits to filter throuigh to the economy, I.E building schools
What are the pros of contractionary fiscal policy? 4 AKA Austeristy policy
Pros of a budget surplus
1) Lower gov borrowing and debt
Cuts to gov spending + increases in taxation = improved gov finances and reduced need for borrowing and more money to service debts -> improving budegt deficit and national debt -> greater confidence in state of government finances -> increasing demand for gov bonds -> reducing interest rates on gov bonds -> easier and chepaer for gov to raise finance over time -> ALSO stabel gov finances attract FDI
2) Flexibiity for gov spending when necessary
Much less unproductive spending on servicing debt interest -> room for expansionary fiscal policy when needed in a recession -> room for spending on public services or infrastructure
3) Less crowding out of private sector
Gov dont need to borrow excessively -> reducing demand for loanable funds in loanable funds market -> reducing equilibrium interest rates -> cheaper for firms to finance investment
4) Can keep inflation low
Decreases in AD through decreases in G and C and I -> decrease in output -> decrease in pressure on exisiting factors of production -> reduced demand pull inflation
What are the cons of contractionary fiscal policy? 3 AKA austerity policy
1) Potential shock to economy
AD falls -> growth decreases -> unemployment increases -> potential recession.
Therefore if economy is fragile then gov need to be very careful with contractionary fiscal policies to avoid major macro ecnomiv objective conflicts
2) Widening income inequalities
Regressive taxes like VAT burden poor more, same with cutting spending on infra. -> long term gov finances could actually worsen if spending is needed to implemetn policies to overcome income inequality AND to deal with costs of income inequality
3) Distorting incentives
If income tax, cooporation tax and/or VAT are raised -? discouraging work and entrepreneurial spirit -> cooporation tax increases discourages investment and FDI -> long run economic growth rates will suffer
What are the evaluation points for expansionary / contractionary fiscal policy? 7
I.E What factors should be considered when implementing said policies
1) Initial level of economic activity
If large negative output gap (large level of spare capacity) = Increase in AD will lead to larger increase in output and decrease in unemployment, cuz w spare capacity it is easy for firms to expand production by using up excess unemployed labour and capital.
ALSO the lack of pressure will limit inflation
If low levels of spare capacity = Difficult for firms to find new workers and increase output, low increases in output and employment and large increase in inflation
2) Level of consumer and business confidence
If low = a reduction in tax, regardless of how big, may have little impact on stimulating AD as consumer worry asbout their future employment prosepects, reducing MPC. Same with businesses concerned about lower profits
3) State of government finances
If gov is in strong financial position ; i.e a budget surplus, then financing expansionary policy will not be such a burden. Less oppportunity cost argument and burden on future generations.
OPPOSITE IS TRUE if large budget deficit
4) Keynesians argue that infrastructure spending can CROWD IN the private sector
Gov spends and boosts demand in economy -> economic activity and incomes rise -> promoting private sector investment as firms seek to profit from activity
ALSO if infrastructure spending such as transport reduces costs for firms -> making them more efficient -> encouraging private sector investment if it is making them more competitive
5) Automatic stabilisers
If economy has; progressive income tax system AND welfare benefits
Can reduce need for expansionary fiscal policy on top of the stabilisers in a recession. The impact of stabilisers; greater G spending on welfare and lower average rates of taxation will cushion the negative impact on growth and unemployment, meaning Gov can limit borrowing and size of their budget deficits.
6) Size of the multiplier
The greater the size, the less the gov will need to increase spending or cut taxes in order to have a large favourable impact on AD, growth and employment. VICE VERSA if multiplier is small.
HOWEVER calculating multiplier is difficult and highly assumptive therefore basing fiscal policy decisions on it is dangerous with no garantuee of success
7) Laffer curve arguments
That increasing progressive taxrs on the rich will distort inscentives if they are beyond the efficient tax rate on the Laffer curve, meaning increases in tax rates woul decrease tax revenue and a cut in taxes would actually raise revenue for the government by promoting entrepreunerial spirit, inward migrationg and incentives to be more productive, improving gov finances
What are the ‘automatic stabilisers’?
Automatic instruments in place in an economy that can reduce fluctuations in the economic cycle : Income tax systems and welfare benefits.
Boom = Incomes increase -> increases average rate of tax for workers as more income is taxed at a higher rate in a higher tax band -> automatically controlling increases in consumer spending -> reducing rate og growth of AD -> restricting size of boom and inflationary pressure.
ALSO with more individuals employed -> goverment spends less on welfare payments -> further restricting G in AD equation -> reducing excessive inflationary pressure
Recession = Incomes fall -> decreases in average rate of tax for workers as less incomes is taxed in lower tax bands -> prevents how much consumer spending falls in economy -> reducing impact of AD decreases -> limiting size of recession and unemployment.
ALSO more unemployed -> Gov spends more on trasnfer payments -> increasing G in AD equation -> limiting size of AD reduction -> oreventing deep large recession
What is monetary policy?
Changes in interest rates, money supply and the exchange rate to influence AD in an economy
Why are interest rates signficant to economy? 2
-Changes in intereset rates affect inflation and can help gov meet inflation targets
-Money market interest rates are benchmark rates when financial institutions set interest rates for credit cards, general loans, savings accounts and mortgages -> hence why changes in interest rates will feed through to rest of economy
What diagram do we use for changes in interest rates?
see flashcard
How can central banks reduce interest rates? 3 (opposite for rise rates)
By increasing or decreasing the money supply in the economy
1) Reduce the reserve requirment
This is the level of reserves as a % of bank deposits that commercial banks must keep at the central bank. By reducing this, less money needs to be kept at central bank, increasing money supply from Sm1 to Sm2, reducing rates from i1 to i2
2) Reduce the repo rate
This is the interest rate charged to commercial banks when they borrow from the central bank. By reducing this, commercial banks have to pay less in interest to central bank, increasing money supply from Sm1 to Sm2, reducing interest rates from i1 to i2
3) Buy bonds using open market operations
Central bank can engage in secondary bond markets by buying up bonds held by commercial banks. Increasing money supply by replacing less liquid financial assets for liquid deposits, reducing interest rates
What is the expansionary monetary policy transmission mechanism? 5 (opposite for contractionary)
How does a reduction in interest rates result in an increase in AD
1) Reducing cost of borrowing -> cheaper to borrow -> increased disposable income -> increases C
2) Reduces rate of return on savings -> reduce incentive to save -> increase MPC -> decreasing saving ration in economy -> increasing C
3) Reduce monthly payments for those with tracker or variable rate mortgages -> these homeowners recieve boost to monthly disposable income -> increase MPC -> increasing C
4) Reduced cost of borrowing for firms -> easier to reach require rate of return for investment projects to go ahead -> increasing MPI -> increasing I.
This also improves quality and quantity of economies factors of production -> increasing LRAS
5) Hot money outlfows -> investors move money out of uk to look for bvetter rate of return elsewhere -> greater supply of UK pound as investors sell it -> weaking exchange rate -> WIDEC -> boosting (x-m)
What problems of expansionary fiscal policy can be overcome with expansionary monetary policy?
With monetary policy, there is no worsening of government finances
What are the cons of expansionary monetary policy? (3) What are the side effects of using monetary policy to boost AD
1) Infaltionary pressure
Infaltion is likely to increase from P1 to P2 as spare capacity in economy is exhausted therefore there is more competition for resources and [pressure put on exisiting factors of production, increasing their prices, causing demand pul inflation
2) keynesians argue that interest rates have a lower bound when economy is in a liquidity trap.
see flashcard for diagram
Where interest rates have already reached so low that individuals have already converted illiquid financial assets into liquid forms e.g cash, to spend on goods and services (this is where the money market demand curve, Dm, become flat; a liquidity trap)
Meaning traditional expansionary monetary policy to increase the money supply from Sm1 to Sm2 will not lower interest rates below i1, therfore fialing to stimulate borrowing, growth and jobs.
3) Large negative impact on savers
They recieve lower RoR on their assets -> for elderly who save most of their money in pension funds, this could severly imapct their living standards upon retirment -> leading to greaster wealth inequality
What are the pros of contractionary monetary policy? (6) Using monetary policy to decrease AD
1) Can control inflation
As interest rates increase -> C, I and (x-m) decrease -> reducing AD -> increasing level of spare capacity -> less pressure on exisiting factors of production -> reducing rate at which their price rises -> reducing demand pull inflation
2) Protects against credit/asset bubbles and systemic risk in banking sector
Periods of prolongued low interest rates could lead to excessive borrowing, driving up debt and asset prices beyond sustainable levels ->economy vunerable to negative demand side shock if asset prices were to fall -> households may default on loan repayments -> bank failure -> systemic risk as bank failure has ripple effect.
High interest rates reduce this risk
3) Make housing more affordable
Interest rates increase -> monthly mortgage payments become more expensive -> reducing demand for housing -> reducing housing prices -> benefiting first time buyers and lower incomes -> reducing wealth inequality
4) Promotes more sustainable lending and borrowing
Low rates attrace lots of borrowers regardless of if they are credit worthy -> lenders take excessive risk -> promoting long term dependancy on credit led consumption and investment.
5) Encourages saving and investment
RoR on savings rise -> increased MPS -> as more saving takes place -> banks have greater funds available to lend out in the form of loans to companies or entrepreneurs -> promoting short run and long run economic growth
6) Provides ability to lower interest rates in times of need
For example during next economic shock
