Chapter 3 - Lecture 3 Flashcards

1
Q

What is social perception?

A

A general term for the processes by which people come to understand one another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does physical appearance play into social perception?

A

As children, we were told that we should not judge a book by its cover, yet as adults we can’t seem to help ourselves…Physical appearance plays a big role in social perception because we tend to form first impressions from faces and other aspects of a person’s appearance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How are individuals with baby faces perceived as?

A

Researchers have found that adults who have baby-faced features, such as large, round eyes; high eyebrows; round cheeks; a large forehead; smooth skin; and a rounded chin tend to be seen as warm, kind, naive, weak, honest, and submissive.

In contrast, adults who have mature
features—small eyes, low brows and a small forehead, wrinkled skin, and an angular chin are seen as stronger, more dominant, and more competent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Provide an example of a study conducted in relations to first impressions..

A

Janine Willis and Alexander Todorov (2006) showed college students photographs of unfamiliar faces for one- tenth of a second, half a second, or a full second. Whether the students judged the faces for how attractive, likeable, competent, trustworthy, or aggressive they were, their ratings even after the briefest exposure were quick and highly correlated with judgments that other observers made without time limits..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are perceptions of situations?

A

In addition to the beliefs we hold about persons, we also have preset notions about certain types of situations/“scripts” that enable us to anticipate the goals, behaviours, and outcomes likely to occur in a particular setting, such as a date or driving the regular route to work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Nonverbal Behaviour?

A

Behaviour that reveals someone’s
feelings without words through things like facial expressions, body language, and vocal cues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are some non verbal cues?

A

Body language, eye contact,
touch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does culture play a role in non verbal or verbal cues?

A

In different cultures there are different variations of greetings, social distance, goodbyes, or even rings.

In Zambia, a ring on the pinky means your single and ready to mingle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is mind perception?

A

The process by which people attribute human-like
mental states to various animate and inanimate objects, including other people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Ekman &
O’Sullivan observe in 1991 about truth and deception?

A

THE STUDY: One group of participants makes truthful or deceptive statements, while another group reads the transcripts, listens to audiotapes or watches videotapes, and then tries to judge the statements…results show that people are only about 54% accurate in judging truth and deception, in part because they too often accept what others say at face value

CONNECTION THAT EKMAN AND O’SULLIVAN MADE: Research shows that professionals who are specially trained and who make these kinds of judgments for a living— such as police detectives, judges, psychiatrists, customs inspectors, and those who administer lie-detector tests for the CIA, the FBI, and the military are also highly prone to error..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the best indicator that a person is lying?

A

Best indicator is voice: hesitate, speed up, raise pitch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Attribution theory?

A

A group of theories that describe
how people explain the causes of behaviour. Motivated to understand others well enough to manage our social lives, we observe, analyze, and explain their behavior. The explanations we come up with are called attribu- tions, and the theory that describes the process is called attribution theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Personal attribution?

A

A attribution to internal
characteristics of an actor (e.g., the actor’s personality, mood, ability)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Situational attribution?

A

A attribution to external
factors (e.g., the task at hand)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the goal of attribution theories?

A

The goal of attribution theories is to understand perceptions of causality, not actual causality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Correspondent Inference Theory??

A

How a behaviour might reflect an enduring personal trait (EX: Degree of choice, expectedness of behaviour, intended effects of behaviour)

**According to Edward Jones and Keith Davis (1965), each of us tries to understand other people by observing and analyzing their behaviour. Jones and Davis’s correspondent inference theory predicts that people try to infer from an action whether the act corresponds to an enduring personal trait of the actor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What 3 factors are a part of the correspondent inference theory?

A
  1. The first factor is a person’s degree of choice. Behaviour that is freely chosen is more informative about a person than behaviour that is coerced by the situation.
  2. A second factor that leads us to make dispositional inferences is the expectedness of behaviour. As previously noted, an action tells us more about a person.
  3. Third, social perceivers take into account the intended effects or consequences of someone’s behaviour. Acts that produce many desirable outcomes do not reveal a person’s specific motives as clearly as acts that produce only a single desirable outcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Kelley’s Covariation Theory??

A

If personal traits or environmental factors determine a behaviour..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the Covariation Principle?

A

A principle of attribution theory that holds that people attribute behaviour to factors that are present when a behaviour occurs and are absent when it does not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the 3 kinds of covariation information?

A
  1. Consensus
  2. Distinctiveness
  3. Consistency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Who is Daniel Kahneman?

A

Daniel Kahneman won a Nobel Prize in economics for work on the psychology of judgment and decision making. In his book Thinking, Fast and Slow, Kahneman (2011) summarizes a lifetime of research showing that the human mind operates by two different systems of thought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

In the book, Thinking, Fast and Slow, by Kahneman, what are the two different systems of thought?

A

System 1 is quick, easy, and automatic— using a process that one might call “intuitive.” Determining which of two objects is more distant, detecting anger in a face, adding 2 + 1 + 2, and understanding a simple sentence are the kinds of automatic activities engaged by this system.

System 2 is slow and controlled and requires attention and effort—using a process that feels more reasoned.

Although, we often opt for the short cut.

23
Q

What are Cognitive Heuristics?

A

Information processing guidelines that make thinking fast but are error-prone

24
Q

What is Availability heuristic?

A

Estimate likelihood of event based on how easily it comes to mind

24
Q

What is False-consensus effect?

A

Overestimate how much others share your own opinions, attributes, and behaviours

25
Q

What is Base-rate fallacy?

A

People tend to be insensitive to
statistics and are more compelled by graphic, dramatic presentations

26
Q

What is Counterfactual Thinking?

A

The tendency to imagine alternative events or outcomes that might have occurred but did not. Usually results in regret or guilt.

27
Q

What is the Fundamental Attribution Error?

A

The tendency to focus on the role of personal causes and underestimate the impact of situations on other people’s behaviour.

28
Q

Who is fundamental attribution
error more likely among?

A
  1. Protestants, those who
    believe in Karma, those of
    upper social class, and in
    high relational mobility..
  2. Fundamental attribution
    error more common among
    American adult participants
    than Indian adult
    participants..
29
Q

What is Wishful seeing?

A

Interpret something we see in a
way that might advantage us

30
Q

What is the Need for self-esteem?

A

Interpret behaviour in a self-
serving way..
* Pervasive except in some Asian cultures

31
Q

What is “Belief in a just world”

A

The belief that individuals get what they deserve in life, an orientation that leads people to disparage victims.

32
Q

What is Impression formation?

A

Process of integrating information about a person to form a coherent impression

33
Q

What is Information integration theory?

A

The theory that impressions are based on (1) perceiver dispositions and (2) a weighted average of a target person’s traits. (Anderson’s 1981)

34
Q

What are Perceiver Characteristics?

A

Each of us differs in terms of the kinds of impressions we form of others. Some people seem to measure others with an intellectual yardstick; others look for physical beauty, a warm smile, a good sense of humour, or a firm handshake. Whatever the attribute, each of us is more likely to notice certain traits than others

35
Q

What is Priming?

A

The tendency for recently used or perceived words or ideas to
come to mind easily and influence the interpretation of new information.

36
Q

Who first demonstrated the effect of priming?

A

The effect of priming on person impressions was first demonstrated by E. Tory Higgins and others (1977).

37
Q

What did Higgins observe about priming?

A

Research participants were presented with a list of trait words, ostensibly as part of an experiment on memory. In fact, the task was designed as a priming device to plant certain ideas in their minds. Some participants read words that evoked a positive image: brave, independent, adventurous. Others read words that evoked a more negative image: reckless, foolish, careless. Later, in what they thought to be an unrelated experiment, participants read about a man named Donald who climbed mountains, drove in a demolition derby, and tried to cross the Atlantic Ocean in a sailboat. As predicted, their impressions of Donald were shaped by the trait words they had earlier memorized. Those exposed to positive words later formed more favorable impressions of him than those exposed to negative words. All participants read exactly the same description, yet they formed different impressions depending on what concept was already on their minds to be used as a basis for comparison..

38
Q

What is trait negativity bias?

A

Tend to weigh negative information more heavily
Why? We expect others to be good
and negative information shatters
that expectation and thus is attended to

  • May also be adaptive – alerts us to
    potential risks
  • Some brain scanning evidence
39
Q

Implicit Personality Theories??

A

Our own network of assumptions about how types of people, traits, and behaviours are related
* E.g., if someone is sincere, we might assume they’re also helpful
* Some traits are more powerful than others

40
Q

What are the two universal dimensions of social perception?

A

Warmth and competence

41
Q

What is the Primacy Effect?

A

The tendency for information presented early in a sequence to have more of an impact on impressions than information presented later

42
Q

In the Primacy Effect…

A

We tend to be more influenced by the first information we learn
about a person..

Why?
* Assume impression is accurate and ignore later information
* Interpret information to in light of impression
* E.g., does proud mean “self-respecting” or “conceited”?
* We do update our impressions in the face of believable facts or
extremely negative information

43
Q

What is Confirmation bias?

A

Tendency to seek, interpret, and
create information that verifies existing beliefs

44
Q

What is Belief perseverance?

A

Tendency to maintain beliefs
even after they have been discredited

Why?
* We create explanations that make sense about the belief that helps it to perpetuated, even after its discredited

45
Q

What is Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing? (Do we seek information objectively, or are we inclined to confirm the suspicions we already hold?)

A

Mark Snyder and William Swann (1978) addressed this question by having pairs of participants who were strangers to one another take part in a getting- acquainted interview. In each pair, one participant was supposed to interview the other. But first, that participant was falsely led to believe that his or her partner was either introverted or extroverted (actually, participants were assigned to these conditions on a random basis) and was then told to select questions from a prepared list….

***Tend to seek out information that will confirm the belief
we already hold

Independent variable: Led to believe interview partner was introverted or
extroverted

Dependant variable: Selection of interview questions

  • In introverted condition, participants selected questions about introversion; in extraverted condition, selected questions about extraversion
  • Confirmed existing beliefs, even though not accurate
46
Q

Why was the con of Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing?

A

The reason is biased experience sampling. Meet someone who seems likable, and you may interact with that person again. Then, if he or she turns out to be twisted, dishonest, or self-centered, you’ll be in a position to observe these traits and revise your impression. But if you meet someone you don’t like, you will try to avoid that person in the future, cutting your- self off from new information and limiting the opportunity to revise your opinion. Attraction breeds interaction, which is why our negative first impressions in particular tend to persist.

47
Q

What is Self-fulfilling prophecy?

A

The process by which one’s
expectations about a person eventually lead that person
to behave in ways that confirm those expectations

48
Q

Who are Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson (1968)

A

Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson (1968) published the results of a study in a book titled Pygmalion in the Classroom. Noticing that teachers had higher expectations for better students, they wondered if teacher expectations influenced student performance rather than the other way around.

–> Teachers had higher expectations for better students

  • Research question: Direction of this relationship?
  • IV: Teachers told randomly assigned students had high IQ
  • DV: Later, real IQ test showed IQ increases in those randomly assigned students

**ALTHOUGH FAILED TO REPLICATE TWICE

49
Q

What is the rejection prophecy? and who founded it

A

Danu Stinson, Jessica Cameron, and others have found that..
(1) people who are insecure are fearful of rejection, which makes them tense and awkward in the social situations, and that
(2) their resulting behaviour is off-putting to others, which
(3) increases the likelihood of rejection and reinforces their initial insecurity (Cameron et al., 2010; Stinson et al., 2009).

50
Q

Explain the bottom line?

A

Basically saying that there are two different views of social perception:

(1) One view suggests that the process is quick and relatively automatic. At the drop of a hat, without much thought, effort, or awareness, people make rapid-fire snap judgments about others based on physical appearance, preconceptions, cognitive heuristics, or just a hint of behavioural evidence

(2) According to a second view, however, the process is far more mindful. People observe others carefully and reserve judgment until their analysis of the target person, behavior, and sit- uation is complete. As suggested by theories of attribution and information inte- gration, the process is eminently logical.

51
Q

How do we come to form opinions of others?

A

Observation, attribution, integration

52
Q

How do we seek to confirm our opinions of others?

A

Confirmation biases (confirmation bias, belief perseverance, confirmatory hypothesis testing, self-
fulfilling prophecies)

53
Q

Are we good Social Perceivers?

A

We Can Be Competent Social Perceivers…

(1)The more experience people have with each other, the
more accurate our judgments are.

(2)Although we are not good at making global judgments about others, we are able to make more limited specific predictions of how others will behave in our own presence.

(3)People can form more accurate impressions of others when we are motivated by concerns of accuracy and open-mindedness.

(4)Some individuals are more accurate than others in their social perceptions (e.g., those who are well adjusted).